Literature DB >> 26576372

Like Mother, Like Daughter? Dietary and Non-Dietary Bone Fracture Risk Factors in Mothers and Their Daughters.

Kamila Sobas1, Lidia Wadolowska1, Malgorzata Anna Slowinska1, Magdalena Czlapka-Matyasik2, Justyna Wuenstel1, Ewa Niedzwiedzka1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to demonstrate similarities and differences between mothers and daughters regarding dietary and non-dietary risk factors for bone fractures and osteoporosis.
METHODS: The study was carried out in 2007-2010 on 712 mothers (29-59 years) and daughters (12-21 years) family pairs. In the sub-sample (170 family pairs) bone mineral density (BMD) was measured for the forearm by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The consumption of dairy products was determined with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (ADOS-Ca) and calcium intake from the daily diet was calculated.
RESULTS: The presence of risk factors for bone fractures in mothers and daughters was significantly correlated. The Spearman rank coefficient for dietary factors of fracture risk was 0.87 (P<0.05) in whole sub-sample, 0.94 (P<0.05) in bottom tercile of BMD, 0.82 (P<0.05) in middle tercile of BMD, 0.54 (P>0.05) in upper tercile of BMD and for non-dietary factors of fracture risk was 0.83 (P<0.05) in whole sub-sample, 0.86 (P<0.05) in bottom tercile of BMD, 0.93 (P<0.05) in middle tercile of BMD, 0.65 (P<0.05) in upper tercile of BMD.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the role of the family environment for bone health and document the stronger effect of negative factors of the family environment as compared to other positive factors on bone fracture risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMD; Daughter; Fracture risk factors; Mother; Osteoporosis

Year:  2015        PMID: 26576372      PMCID: PMC4645765     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Public Health        ISSN: 2251-6085            Impact factor:   1.429


Introduction

Osteoporosis is a systemic metabolic bone disease which produces a reduction in bone density together with abnormal structure (1, 2). Currently, both the diagnosis and therapy of osteoporosis focus on determining the individual risk for bone fracture (3). This approach requires collecting information on the occurrence of dietary and non-dietary risk factors for bone fractures. Dietary risk factors for bone fractures include calcium intake (4). It is commonly thought that adequate calcium intake improves bone mineral density (5). Dietary calcium intake and dairy product consumption are the most important during childhood and adolescence (5). Non-dietary factors increasing bone fracture risk include female sex, white race, advanced age, menstruation disorders, early menopause, previous fractures, hip fractures in parents, low BMI, low bone mass, administration of corticosteroids, rheumatoid arthritis, low physical activity, poor self-evaluated health, smoking and alcohol abuse (1, 3). Bone mineral density is under the strong genetic influence (6, 7). Epidemiological observations document the family background of osteoporosis (8, 9). Individuals with a family history of osteoporosis reveal a tendency to a more intense bone degradation process. Therefore, the probability of osteoporosis in a woman whose mother had this condition, as well as in a woman who inherited tall height or slight build bone from her mother is high (10). It is estimated that heredity determines 70–85% of the mineral density of axial skeleton bones and proximal heads of femurs and 50–60% of the appendicular skeleton (11). The rate of bone density loss and inherited tendency to develop osteoporosis can be reduced by a change of modifiable factors of bone fracture risk, including an improvement in calcium intake (12). The family environment affects the food intake by members of the family (13, 14). Since women are more sensitive to environmental stimuli, positive attitudes of mothers towards health can have an effect on more favourable dietary patterns of the daughter and their better nutritional status (15, 16). In Polish teenagers, Jeżewska-Zychowicz (14) revealed that positive eating habits occurring in the family, hospitality and openness to knowledge were conductive to more appropriate frequency of consumption of milk, dairy products, fruit and raw and cooked vegetables. In American youth the frequency of having common family meals was positively related to the intake of fruit, vegetables, cereal products and calcium rich food, and negatively related to the consumption of soft beverages (17). Thus a strong positive correlation between family meal consumption and the quality of the diet was showed. Mutual relations between genetic and non-genetic factors determine higher intensification of osteoporosis in some families and lower intensification in others. The improvement of public health and prevention of osteoporosis requires better understanding of family environment factors. An important element of this understanding is to determine the burden of dietary and non-dietary risk factors for bone fractures and osteoporosis in mothers and daughters. The aim of the study was to demonstrate similarities and differences between mothers and daughters regarding risk factors for bone fractures and osteoporosis.

Materials and Methods

Sample selection

The study was carried out in 2007–2010 within the scientific project “Analysis of mother-daughter dairy products dietary patterns in relation to bone mineral status and calcium deficiency and osteoporosis risk among women. MODAF Study”. A recruitment details and inclusion/exclusion criteria can be found elsewhere (15). Briefly, the participants were a convenience sample. The study included mothers ageing under 60 years and daughters ageing above 12 years and before 21 years. Initially, 817 mother-daughter family pairs were recruited (Fig. 1). During data verification 105 mother-daughter family pairs were removed. Finally, the study included 712 mothers and daughters (Table 1). In the total sample, the dietary study was carried out and bone fractures risk factors were collected. In the subsample (170 family pairs) bone mineral density (BMD) was measured and some other osteoporosis risk factors was collected. For the subsample all mothers and daughters were chosen living in one typical area of Poland.
Fig. 1:

Sample selection and data collection. Notes: () in the brackets indicated the number of mothers and daughters

Table 1:

Description of the total sample and sub-sample of mothers and daughters tested with bone densitometry

VariablesTotal sampleSub-sample
MothersDaughtersMothersDaughters
Sample size712712170170
Age § (years)43.8±5.9 (29–59)16.9±2.6 (12–21)45.5±5.8 (32–59)18.1±2.9 (12–21)
BMI § (kg/m2)25.6±4.220.7±2.626.2±4.620.5±2.8
Mothers’ age groups (% of the sample)
  29–39 years2816
  40–49 years5661
  50–59 years1622
Daughters’ age groups # (% of the sample)
  <15 years3018
  15–18 years2917
  >18 years4165
Education (% of the sample)
  elementary141125
  secondary67387120
  higher28212855
Place of living ¥ (% of the sample)
  village4863
  town <50 000 residents166
  town 50–100 000 residents1411
  city >100 000 residents2220
Self-declared economic situation ¥ (% of the sample)
  bad11
  satisfactorily2329
  good6663
  very good107
Description of household ¥ (% of the sample)
  we live very poorly01
  we live poorly12
  we live modestly78
  we live very thriftily1413
  we live relatively thriftily5451
  we live very good2325
Physical activity § (MET-minutes/week)1609±11051111±8201996±13591309±1026

mean ± standard deviation; significant differences between total sample and sub-sample at P<0.05 as follows:

in mothers,

in daughters,

for daughters was given present educational level

in family; () in the brackets indicated minimum-maximum range;

for 417 mother-daughter family pairs with complete physical activity data

Sample selection and data collection. Notes: () in the brackets indicated the number of mothers and daughters Description of the total sample and sub-sample of mothers and daughters tested with bone densitometry mean ± standard deviation; significant differences between total sample and sub-sample at P<0.05 as follows: in mothers, in daughters, for daughters was given present educational level in family; () in the brackets indicated minimum-maximum range; for 417 mother-daughter family pairs with complete physical activity data The research received permission from: (i) the Bioethics Committee of the Regional Medical Chamber in Olsztyn in 2001, on June 27, 2001, Resolution No. 49/2001 and (ii) the Bioethics Committee of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn on June 17, 2010, Resolution No. 20/2010.

General information

All information was collected by personal interview and measured by well-trained researchers. The respondents were asked about their date of birth, place of residence and education level (“elementary”, “secondary” or higher”). Two closed-questions were used for description of the family economic situation: – self-declared economic situation with four answers: “bad”, “satisfactory”, “good” and “very good”, – self-declared situation of the household with six answers (based on the Polish Central Office of Statistics): (i) “we live very poorly – we do not have enough resources even for the cheapest food and clothing”, (ii) “we live poorly – we do not have enough resources for housing fees”, (iii) “we live modestly – we have enough resources only for food and clothing”, (iv) “we live very thriftily”, (v) “we live relatively thriftily”, (vi) “we live very well – we can afford everything without limitations”

Assessment of consumption of dairy products and dietary calcium

The consumption of dairy products was determined using a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (acronym ADOS-Ca) (16). Calcium intake from each dairy product and daily diet was calculated. More details for this calculation can be found elsewhere (15, 16). Briefly, the data was collected on the frequency of consumption and portion size usually consumed (during the last six months) of 11 groups of dairy products. Respondents were questioned about typically-eaten servings. The calcium intake (mg/day) from dairy products was calculated by summing up the calcium intakes from all groups of dairy products. Finally, the calcium intake from the daily diet was calculated on the basis of calcium intake from dairy products according to the formula worked out in the validation study (16). The number of mothers and daughters (in %) who met the Polish calcium intake recommendations and did not meet calcium intake recommendations was calculated (18) using the probability method. The established cut-off points (i.e., z-values of individual calcium intake <−1SD or >1SD) produced conclusions with a probability of 0.85.

Collection of risk factors for bone fractures and osteoporosis

Information on risk factors influencing bone mass and presence of osteoporosis was collected. A questionnaire with closed-questions was used. A comprehensive list of dietary and non-dietary risk factors was prepared. In total, information regarding 21 risk factors was collected, including dietary (6 items) and non-dietary risk factors (15 items) (2, 3, 5). Low BMI was not included in any subgroup because of the difficulty of classifying it as a non-dietary risk factor, although weight and BMI are strongly correlated with diet. Information about the customary consumption of ready-made calcium enriched cereal products and calcium enriched juices was collected as well as everyday consumption of dairy products at pre-school and school age (yes, no, I don’t know). During the interview information about non-dietary risk factors affecting bone weight and occurrence was collected, such as: occurrence of bone pains (yes, no, I don’t know), current smoking (no, occasionally ≤5 pcs/day, >pcs/day), past fractures (yes, no, I don’t know), calcium supplement use (yes, no, I don’t know), incidence of other chronic diseases than tthyroid diseases and rheumatoid arthritis, e.g. lung diseases, cardiac diseases, vascular diseases, cancer, diabetes mellitus, stroke (19) (yes, no), menstruation (yes – regularly, yes – irregularly, I haven’t started menstruating, I have stopped menstruating), incidence of osteoporosis in the family (yes, no, I don’t know), physical activity (low, moderate, high), incidence of thyroid diseases (yes, no), hormonal contraceptive use (yes, no), glucocorticosteroid use (yes, no), incidence of rheumatoid arthritis (yes, no), sun exposure frequency (I avoid sun exposure, rarely, often, very often), health status in own assessment (very good, good, quite good, poor), consumption of significant amounts of alcohol (yes, no, I don’t know). The physical activity level was determined by using a validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), a long version last 7 days, expressed as a standard Metabolic Energy Turnover in MET-minutes/week (20, 21). According to the procedure made by the IPAQ Research Committee, 295 family pairs were excluded (activity time >960 minutes/24h). Three levels of physical activity were classified: low (<600 MET-minutes/week), moderate (600–2999), high (3000 or more).

Assessment of Bone Mineral Density and body mass

Bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) was measured with a pDEXA densitometer with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the distal part of the radius and the ulna (2). Three subgroups were created according to BMD terciles (bottom, middle, upper) for mothers (mT1BMD, mT2BMD, mT3BMD) and separately for daughters (cT1BMD, cT2BMD, cT3BMD). Weight and height of the respondents were measured and body mass index was calculated (BMI, kg/m2).

Statistical analysis

The average intake of calcium of dairy products, age, BMI, BMD and T-score BMD were expressed with the mean (x) and the standard deviation (SD). The Spearman’s rank correlation for calcium in-take from dairy products and dietary calcium in-take of mothers and daughters were calculated (22). Lists of dairy products according to their diminishing share in calcium supply in the daily diet were created separately for mothers and daughters. Similarity of the calcium source ranking in diets of mothers and daughters as well as similarity of dietary and non-dietary bone risk factor ranking was verified using a Spearman rank order test. Spearman’s rank correlation for BMD and three fracture risk factors with numerical data (age, dietary calcium intake, physical activity) were calculated separately for mothers and daughters. Before the analysis, BMD (in g/cm2), dietary calcium in-take (in mg/day) and physical activity (in MET-minutes/week) were converted to SD scores by using values obtained for the participants. The relationship between BMD mothers and BMD daughters in a complex system was evaluated with a correspondence analysis using Burt’s panels. We include 6 features into the correspondence analysis. We analyzed the relations between BMD mothers and BMD daughters divided into terciles (mT1BMD, mT2BMD, mT3BMD, dT1BMD, dT2BMD, dT3BMD) and obtained a high level of explained inertia in this model (56%). The statistical analysis was performed with Statistica 10.0 PL software (StatSoft, Poland).

Results

The women from the total sample and in the sub-sample did not significant differ in social and demographic parameters as well as BMI in either mothers or daughters (Table 1). Calcium intake from all dairy products by mothers and daughters was correlated (P<0.05) (Table 2). The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.29 for cheese for spreading to 0.17 for cream. The correlation coefficient for the dietary calcium intake of mothers and daughters was 0.25 in the total sample and 0.23 in sub-sample (both P<0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2:

Comparison of calcium intake from dairy products and dietary calcium intake by mothers and daughters in the total sample (mg/day; mean±standard deviation)

VariablesMothersDaughtersMother-daughter differencesMother-daughter correlation coefficient
Sample size712712
Milk156±205160±195−40.19*
Rennet cheese90±123135±172−45***0.25*
Fruit yoghurt58±79101±131−43***0.22*
Natural yoghurt54±10532±7022***0.19*
Kefir, buttermilk22±4619±443*0.22*
Processed cheese20±4829±65−9**0.27*
Fresh cheese15±2410±185***0.25*
Homogenized cheese9±1617±24−8***0.22*
Ice-creams8±1328±33−20***0.23*
Cream5±122±63***0.17*
Cheese for spreading2±162±600.29*
Calcium from dairy products in total441±314535±354−94***0.25*
Dietary calcium596±424723±479−127***0.25*

significance of differences at:

P<0.05;

P<0.01;

P<0.001

Comparison of calcium intake from dairy products and dietary calcium intake by mothers and daughters in the total sample (mg/day; mean±standard deviation) significance of differences at: P<0.05; P<0.01; P<0.001 A high correlation (r=0.92) between mothers and daughters was found for calcium sources and their share in diet (Fig. 2). The main sources of calcium in the daily diet were in mothers: milk, rennet cheese, fruit yoghurt and natural yoghurt and in daughters: milk, rennet cheese and fruit yoghurt. Mothers supplied in their daily diet significantly less calcium than daughters (596 vs. 723 mg/day) (Table 2), both intakes were extremely below the Polish national recommendation (RDA for calcium: 1000–1300 mg/day) (18). Daughters, in comparison to mothers, consumed significantly more calcium from rennet cheese, fruit yoghurt, ice-creams, processed cheese and homogenized cheese.
Fig. 2:

Comparison of the calcium source ranking similarity according to calcium sources share in daily diet of mothers and daughters in the total sample (mean value in % calcium). Notes: r – correlation coefficient for dietary calcium source ranking; significance of differences at: * P <0.05

Comparison of the calcium source ranking similarity according to calcium sources share in daily diet of mothers and daughters in the total sample (mean value in % calcium). Notes: r – correlation coefficient for dietary calcium source ranking; significance of differences at: * P <0.05 The presence of risk factors for bone fractures in mothers and daughters was significantly correlated (Table 3). The Spearman rank coefficients were significant for dietary factors of fracture risk: 0.87 in whole sub-sample, 0.94 in bottom and 0.82 in middle tercile of BMD, and for non-dietary factors of fracture risk: 0.83 in whole sub-sample, 0.86 in bottom, 0.93 in middle, 0.65 in upper tercile of BMD.
Table 3:

Comparison of the occurrence of fracture risk factors in mothers and daughters by BMD terciles in the sub-sample

VariablesMothersDaughtersMothers and daughters T1BMDMothers and daughters T2BMDMothers and daughters T3BMD
mT1BMDdT1BMDmT2BMDdT2BMDmT3BMDdT3BMD
Sample size170170575757565657
Age (years)45.5±5.818.1±2.947.1±6.8A,B16.5±3.3a,b44.3±5.0A19.2±2.0a45.3±5.3B18.7±2.4b
BMD (mg/cm2)***379±59337±56322±29α276±34α374±15β340±13β443±45γ396±28γ
Dietary calcium intake §(mg/day)507±363577±395536±363613±417461±279552±407522±433567±364
Physical activity § (MET-minutes/week)***1996±13591309±10262256±1469[δ,C]1188±996δ1571±1317C,D1227±10792165±1193[ɛ,D]1508±990ɛ
Dietary risk factors (% of the sample)
Consumption of calcium-enriched juices7276707975757175
Daily consumption of dairy products during pre-school periods**6454605486487558
Consumption of ready-made calcium enriched cereal products*6374617970735768
Daily consumption of dairy products during school periods***6131613747257330
Respondents who did not meet# calcium intake recommendations11312790112
Respondents who met# calcium intake recommendations20000050
Correlation coefficient for dietary risk factor ranking0.87*0.94*0.82*0.54
Non-dietary risk factors (% of the sample)
Bone pains***7556745375647751
Current smoking***257187325259
Past fractures2425252632231625
Calcium supplementation2216251421162118
Other chronic diseases ***221025121472711
Menstruation disorders**189282374202
Osteoporosis in the family1616162011162117
Low physical activity ¥**152972626381123
Thyroid diseases**10311254144
Hormonal contraceptive use799497216
Glucocorticosteroid use*62529242
Rheumatoid arthritis**50505040
Avoiding sun exposure***50705040
Poor health condition**40502040
Consumption of significant amounts of alcohol10002000
Correlation coefficient for non-dietary risk factor ranking0.83*0.86*0.93*0.65*

mean ± standard deviation;

used cut-off points produced conclusions with a probability of 0.85 and, because of this, the number respondents who met or did not meet calcium intake recommendations do not sum up to 100%;

other chronic diseases than thyroid diseases and rheumatoid arthritis, e.g. lung diseases, cardiac diseases, vascular diseases, cancers, diabetes mellitus, stroke;

low physical activity: <600 MET-minutes/week; mT1BMD – bottom tercile BMD by mothers, mT2BMD – middle tercile BMD by mothers, mT3BMD – upper tercile BMD by mothers; dT1BMD – bottom tercile BMD by daughters, dT2BMD – middle tercile BMD by daughters, dT3BMD – upper tercile BMD by daughters; significance of differences between mothers and daughters in whole sub-sample at:

P <0.05;

P<0.01;

P<0.001; significance of differences at P<0.05:

between mothers’ BMD terciles

between daughters’ BMD terciles,

between mothers and daughters’ BMD terciles;

Comparison of the occurrence of fracture risk factors in mothers and daughters by BMD terciles in the sub-sample mean ± standard deviation; used cut-off points produced conclusions with a probability of 0.85 and, because of this, the number respondents who met or did not meet calcium intake recommendations do not sum up to 100%; other chronic diseases than thyroid diseases and rheumatoid arthritis, e.g. lung diseases, cardiac diseases, vascular diseases, cancers, diabetes mellitus, stroke; low physical activity: <600 MET-minutes/week; mT1BMD – bottom tercile BMD by mothers, mT2BMD – middle tercile BMD by mothers, mT3BMD – upper tercile BMD by mothers; dT1BMD – bottom tercile BMD by daughters, dT2BMD – middle tercile BMD by daughters, dT3BMD – upper tercile BMD by daughters; significance of differences between mothers and daughters in whole sub-sample at: P <0.05; P<0.01; P<0.001; significance of differences at P<0.05: between mothers’ BMD terciles between daughters’ BMD terciles, between mothers and daughters’ BMD terciles; Mothers from the bottom tercile of BMD were significantly older than mothers from the middle or upper tercile of BMD (Table 3). Daughters from the bottom tercile of BMD were significantly younger than daughters from the middle or upper tercile of BMD. BMD of mothers was significantly higher than daughters in the whole sub-sample (379 vs. 337 mg/cm2, respectively) as well as in each BMD tercile (Table 3). More mothers than daughters consumed dairy products daily during pre-school and school periods. In comparison to daughters, fewer mothers consumed ready-made cereal products enriched with calcium. Significantly more mothers than daughters suffered from bone pains, smoked, suffered from chronic diseases, menstruation disorders, thyroid diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, poor health condition, used glucocorticosteroids avoided sun exposure. The total physical activity was significantly higher in mothers than daughters in the whole sub-sample as well as in the bottom and upper BMD terciles. No significant correlation was found between BMD and dietary calcium intake or BMD and physical activity in the total sub-sample and each BMD tercile in mothers as well as daughters (Table 4). In daughters whole sub-sample, the correlation between age and BMD was significant (r=0.30).
Table 4:

Correlation coefficients for bone mineral density§ and fracture risk factors in mothers and daughters by BMD terciles within the sub-sample with Spearman’s rank test

VariablesMothersDaughters
TotalmT1BMDmT2BMDmT3BMDTotaldT1BMDdT2BMDdT3BMD
Sample size170575756170575657
Age−0.11−0.250.160.080.30[*]0.41[*]0.040.03
Dietary calcium intake§−0.060.050.03−0.04−0.08−0.25−0.09−0.02
Physical activity§−0.020.11−0.09−0.160.13−0.10−0.03−0.01

values were converted to SD scores; mT1BMD – bottom tercile BMD by mothers, mT2BMD – middle tercile BMD by mothers, mT3BMD – upper tercile BMD by mothers; dT1BMD – bottom tercile BMD by daughters, dT2BMD – middle tercile BMD by daughters, dT3BMD – upper tercile BMD by daughters; significance of differences at:

P <0.05;

Correlation coefficients for bone mineral density§ and fracture risk factors in mothers and daughters by BMD terciles within the sub-sample with Spearman’s rank test values were converted to SD scores; mT1BMD – bottom tercile BMD by mothers, mT2BMD – middle tercile BMD by mothers, mT3BMD – upper tercile BMD by mothers; dT1BMD – bottom tercile BMD by daughters, dT2BMD – middle tercile BMD by daughters, dT3BMD – upper tercile BMD by daughters; significance of differences at: P <0.05; The same terciles of BMD were stated in 39% of mother-daughter pairs, in the bottom tercile of BMD in 16% of pairs, in the middle tercile of BMD in 11% pairs and in the upper tercile of BMD in 12% pairs (Table 5). The correspondence analysis demonstrated the existence of the strong relation between BMD of mothers and BMD of daughters. Three clusters were distinguished (Fig. 3). The S1 cluster was made up by the middle BMD tercile of mothers and the upper BMD tercile of daughters. The S2 cluster was made up of the upper BMD tercile of mothers and the middle BMD tercile of daughters. The S3 cluster was made up of the both bottom BMD terciles of mothers and daughters.
Table 5:

Distribution of mothers and daughters by BMD terciles

Daughters’ BMD terciles n (%)
dT1BMD 57 (34)dT2BMD 56 (33)dT3BMD 57 (34)
Mothers’ BMD tercilesmT1BMD 57 (34%)27 (16)14 (8)16 (9)
mT2BMD 57 (34%)18 (11)19 (11)20 (12)
mT3BMD 56 (33%)12 (7)23 (14)21 (12)
Sum of mother-daughter pairs with compatible BMD terciles67 (39)
Sum of mother-daughter pairs with non-compatible BMD terciles103 (61)

() in the brackets percentage of mother-daughter pairs

Fig. 3:

Graphic presentation of the relationship between bone mineral density in mothers and daughters in the sub-sample; () in brackets are the given explained inertia in two dimensions; areas marked by rectangles and signed S1, S2 and S3 point three clusters grouping features correlated with each other. Notes: mT1BMD – bottom tercile BMD by mothers, mT2BMD – middle tercile BMD by mothers, mT3BMD – upper tercile BMD by mothers; dT1BMD – bottom tercile BMD by daughters, dT2BMD – middle tercile BMD by daughters, dT3BMD – upper tercile BMD by daughters

Distribution of mothers and daughters by BMD terciles () in the brackets percentage of mother-daughter pairs Graphic presentation of the relationship between bone mineral density in mothers and daughters in the sub-sample; () in brackets are the given explained inertia in two dimensions; areas marked by rectangles and signed S1, S2 and S3 point three clusters grouping features correlated with each other. Notes: mT1BMD – bottom tercile BMD by mothers, mT2BMD – middle tercile BMD by mothers, mT3BMD – upper tercile BMD by mothers; dT1BMD – bottom tercile BMD by daughters, dT2BMD – middle tercile BMD by daughters, dT3BMD – upper tercile BMD by daughters

Discussion

The study showed the existence of a similarity between mothers and daughters, both in the occurrence of dietary and non-dietary factors of fracture risk. Differences between mothers and daughters concerned the level of threat with risk factors. In comparison to daughters, mothers were more burdened with adverse factors increasing bone fracture risk, but they revealed more favourable dietary habits reducing the risk of bone fractures. A strong similarity in BMD concerned mothers and daughters with low BMD. The similarity between mothers and daughters regarding medium and higher BMD was weaker. The same BMD terciles were found in nearly 40% mother-daughter family pairs. Our results are difficult to compare with previous findings. We used a unique approach by grouping subjects before the statistical analysis, but agreement with previous studies may be found. Authors who used correlation analysis showed a significant association between mothers and daughters in BMD (23–25), which partially confirms our results. There are three possible explanations for the similarity of low BMD in mothers and daughters. The first is the effect of age. Mothers with the lowest BMD were older (by 2–3 years) and daughters with the low BMD were younger (by 2–3 years) than those with moderate and high BMD. Thus, our findings in older women group might result from the intensifying of bone resorption and in younger girls might result from the slowing of bone mineralisation within 2–3 years after menarche (26). Secondly, the daughters’ low BMD might be inherited from mothers. Osteoporosis is determined by multiple genes (27). There is evidence of the occurrence of similar “skeleton features” among family members (28). A high correlation of BMD was observed among the three female Mexican generations (23). In Japanese daughter-mother pairs, BMD was significantly correlated, but no significant correlation was found in mother-grandmother or daughter-grandmother pairs (24). A family similarity concerning bone strength in girls and women probably is established in the first year of life, but the familial correlation of BMD might disappear due to a menopause-associated estrogen deficiency (24, 25). The next explanation of low BMD similarity in mothers and daughters might involve environmental factors (1–7, 27). Some of these factors may be “inherited” such as lifestyle, habits and behaviors. An “osteoporotic environment”, defined as “the sum of influences which depend on the surroundings, opportunities, or conditions of life”, may promote osteoporosis in certain families. In our study, a significant correlation between mothers and daughters in the occurrence of both dietary and non-dietary fracture risk factors was observed. It should be underlined that correlation coefficients were higher in mothers and daughters with low or moderate mineral density (from 0.82 to 0.94) than those with high bone mineral density (below 0.66). Non-dietary risk factors for bone fractures which might be under the influence of family behaviours and create an “osteoporotic environment” in the family include: past fractures, calcium supplementation, chronic diseases, osteoporosis in the family and hormonal contraceptive use. Surprising, we found significant differences (lack of similarity) between mothers and daughters in the occurrence of low physical activity. Swee and Win (29) also found no correlation in physical activity in pairs of premenopausal mothers and their daughters aged 10–19 years. Physical activity level is age- and gender-specific. Teenage girls are more likely to have a sedentary lifestyle than boys at the same age (30, 31). It may be supposed that a lack of similarity in physical activity between mothers and daughters resulted from girls’ specific lifestyle, so the impact of “family environment” was weaker. Family similarity between mothers and daughters was reflected by the occurrence of similar dietary factors of fracture risk. Mothers and daughters had similar sources of dietary calcium in their diets. These were mainly milk, cheese and fruit yoghurt, which supplied over 50% of dietary calcium. A study by Harris (32) of 902 families found a strong association between the number of servings of dairy foods consumed by the adolescents and their parents. A similar relation was observed in American (33) and Malay mother-daughter pairs (29) with conclusion that mothers play an important role in influencing the dietary habits of their daughters which, in turn, may affect their bone health status. The similarity between mothers and daughters was also reflected by lack of significant correlation between BMD and dietary calcium intake or physical activity. Our results are compatible with some previous findings (34, 35). However, there are some contradictory findings (36–39). In contrast to our findings, physical activity is clearly recognized as factor positively associated with an increase in bone mass during a developmental period (6). This was confirmed in subjects reporting recreational exercise (40, 41). In our study, mothers with low or high BMD were significantly more physically active than mothers with moderate BMD, and all of them were under the influence of many different fracture risk factors. The impact of environmental factors on BMD is complex, since it is difficult to explain the association between bone mineral density and a single risk factor (1, 2, 5, 42). We showed that mothers were more burdened with factors increasing bone fracture risk than daughters. It is an expected result because of age differences (31). The main five non-dietary risk factors occurred (in decreasing order) in 75% to 22% of the mothers, and 56% to 16% of the daughters. We cannot identify which factors (from 21 which were assessed) were more effective than others in low BMD. Based on previous findings, it may be assumed that past fractures, osteoporosis in the family, current smoking and low physical activity in mothers or daughters were the most important factors increasing the risk of bone fractures (42–45). Our study revealed an interesting finding. We found more protective dietary habits in mothers reduced the risk of bone fractures. In the past, during pre-school and school periods, more mothers than daughters consumed dairy products (and calcium) daily. This might have resulted from generation transformation and changes in food supply as well as food consumption in Poland over the past fifty years. Mothers were in pre-school and school age when dairy consumption in Poland was relatively high, and peaked in the 1980s (on average, 260–280 litres/person/year after recalculation to milk) (46). Daughters were in pre-school and school age when dairy consumption decreased significantly by 30%, but at the same time increased the consumption of fast-food and highly-prepared food and the traditional Polish diet became westernized (31). Therefore, we documented that the occurrence of protective factors of bone fracture may be irrespective of age. Secondly, we showed the limitation of “inheritance” dietary habits shared with family members. Our findings demonstrate that family habits in food consumption are also influenced by the external impact such as food supply on domestic market.

Study weakness

Bone densitometric measurements were carried out in a medium-sized subsample, which was non-randomly selected from the general population. However, in mothers/daughters from a large-sized basic sample and sub-sample, a similarity in dietary calcium intake was revealed – the correlation coefficient for dietary calcium intake of mothers and daughters was nearly equal. This allows generalization of results obtained in the sub-sample and stronger conclusions to be drawn.

Study strengths

The study strength is the assessment of the occurrence of dietary and non-dietary factors of fracture risk (1–3). Such a broad scope of research is realized in family pairs. An advantage of this research is the use of validated tools to assess dietary calcium intake (16) and physical activity (20).

Conclusion

In mothers and daughters, similarity was found in the occurrence of dietary and non-dietary factors of fracture risk. Differences between mothers and daughters concerned the level of threat with risk factors. In comparison to daughters, mothers were more burdened with factors increasing bone fracture risk, but they revealed more favourable dietary habits reducing the risk of bone fractures. Our results demonstrate the stronger effect of adverse factors of family environment than protective factors on bone fracture risk and osteoporosis. Improvement of public health in Poland requires the elimination of adverse dietary and non-dietary habits in women and the development and strengthening of health-promoting habits in girls.

Ethical considerations

Ethical issues (including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.
  34 in total

1.  Familial resemblance and diversity in bone mass and strength in the population are established during the first year of postnatal life.

Authors:  Qingju Wang; Markku Alén; Arja Lyytikäinen; Leiting Xu; Fran A Tylavsky; Urho M Kujala; Heikki Kröger; Ego Seeman; Sulin Cheng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Self-reported recreational exercise combining regularity and impact is necessary to maximize bone mineral density in young adult women: a population-based study of 1,061 women 25 years of age.

Authors:  M Callréus; F McGuigan; K Ringsberg; K Akesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Recreational football training decreases risk factors for bone fractures in untrained premenopausal women.

Authors:  E W Helge; P Aagaard; M D Jakobsen; E Sundstrup; M B Randers; M K Karlsson; P Krustrup
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  Building healthy bones throughout life: an evidence-informed strategy to prevent osteoporosis in Australia.

Authors:  Peter R Ebeling; Robin M Daly; Deborah A Kerr; Michael G Kimlin
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  GPR98/Gpr98 gene is involved in the regulation of human and mouse bone mineral density.

Authors:  Tomohiko Urano; Masataka Shiraki; Hideshi Yagi; Masako Ito; Noriko Sasaki; Makoto Sato; Yasuyoshi Ouchi; Satoshi Inoue
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Calcium and dairy intakes of adolescents are associated with their home environment, taste preferences, personal health beliefs, and meal patterns.

Authors:  Nicole I Larson; Mary Story; Melanie Wall; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2006-11

7.  Calcium intake and osteoporosis: the influence of calcium intake from dairy products on hip bone mineral density and fracture incidence - a population-based study in women over 55 years of age.

Authors:  Dariusz Włodarek; Dominika Głąbska; Aleksandra Kołota; Piotr Adamczyk; Aleksandra Czekajło; Władysław Grzeszczak; Bogna Drozdzowska; Wojciech Pluskiewicz
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  Family Influences: Mothers' and Daughters' Use of Multivitamin Mineral Supplements.

Authors:  Leann L. Birch; Yoonna Lee
Journal:  Nutr Today       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

9.  Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Dietary Patterns among Children.

Authors:  Jessica S Gubbels; Patricia van Assema; Stef P J Kremers
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2013-04-12

10.  Dairy products, dietary calcium and bone health: possibility of prevention of osteoporosis in women: the Polish experience.

Authors:  Lidia Wadolowska; Kamila Sobas; Justyna W Szczepanska; Malgorzata A Slowinska; Magdalena Czlapka-Matyasik; Ewa Niedzwiedzka
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 5.717

View more
  4 in total

1.  Dietary-Lifestyle Patterns Associated with Bone Turnover Markers, and Bone Mineral Density in Adult Male Distance Amateur Runners-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Aleksandra Bykowska-Derda; Magdalena Zielińska-Dawidziak; Magdalena Czlapka-Matyasik
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 2.  Nutritional Aspects of Bone Health and Fracture Healing.

Authors:  Athanasios Karpouzos; Evangelos Diamantis; Paraskevi Farmaki; Spyridon Savvanis; Theodore Troupis
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2017-12-31

3.  Reproducibility of A Non-Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (62-Item FFQ-6) and PCA-Driven Dietary Pattern Identification in 13-21-Year-Old Females.

Authors:  Ewa Niedzwiedzka; Lidia Wadolowska; Joanna Kowalkowska
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Dairy-Related Dietary Patterns, Dietary Calcium, Body Weight and Composition: A Study of Obesity in Polish Mothers and Daughters, the MODAF Project.

Authors:  Lidia Wadolowska; Natalia Ulewicz; Kamila Sobas; Justyna W Wuenstel; Malgorzata A Slowinska; Ewa Niedzwiedzka; Magdalena Czlapka-Matyasik
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.