Literature DB >> 22246601

Self-reported recreational exercise combining regularity and impact is necessary to maximize bone mineral density in young adult women: a population-based study of 1,061 women 25 years of age.

M Callréus1, F McGuigan, K Ringsberg, K Akesson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Recreational physical activity in 25-year-old women in Sweden increases bone mineral density (BMD) in the trochanter by 5.5% when combining regularity and impact. Jogging and spinning were especially beneficial for hip BMD (6.4-8.5%). Women who enjoyed physical education in school maintained their higher activity level at age 25.
INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of recreational exercise on BMD and describe how exercise patterns change with time in a normal population of young adult women.
METHODS: In a population-based study of 1,061 women, age 25 (±0.2), BMD was measured at total body (TB-BMD), femoral neck (FN-BMD), trochanter (TR-BMD), and spine (LS-BMD). Self-reported physical activity status was assessed by questionnaire. Regularity of exercise was expressed as recreational activity level (RAL) and impact load as peak strain score (PSS). A permutation (COMB-RP) was used to evaluate combined endurance and impacts on bone mass.
RESULTS: More than half of the women reported exercising on a regular basis and the most common activities were running, strength training, aerobics, and spinning. Seventy percent participated in at least one activity during the year. Women with high RAL or PSS had higher BMD in the hip (2.6-3.5%) and spine (1.5-2.1%), with the greatest differences resulting from PSS (p < 0.001-0.02). Combined regularity and impact (high-COMB-RP) conferred the greatest gains in BMD (FN 4.7%, TR 5.5%, LS 3.1%; p < 0.001) despite concomitant lower body weight. Jogging and spinning were particularly beneficial for hip BMD (+6.4-8.5%). Women with high-COMB-RP scores enjoyed physical education in school more and maintained higher activity levels throughout compared to those with low scores.
CONCLUSION: Self-reported recreational levels of physical activity positively influence BMD in young adult women but to maximize BMD gains, regular, high-impact exercise is required. Enjoyment of exercise contributes to regularity of exercising which has short- and long-term implications for bone health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22246601     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1886-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  45 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Eisman
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Quantifying leisure physical activity and its relation to bone density and strength.

Authors:  Kristine M Shedd; Kathy B Hanson; D Lee Alekel; Daniel J Schiferl; Laura N Hanson; Marta D Van Loan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Genetic determinants of bone mass in adult women: a reevaluation of the twin model and the potential importance of gene interaction on heritability estimates.

Authors:  C W Slemenda; J C Christian; C J Williams; J A Norton; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  C H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Total and regional bone mass in female soccer players.

Authors:  H Alfredson; P Nordström; R Lorentzon
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  Exercise and bone mineral density.

Authors:  P D Chilibeck; D G Sale; C E Webber
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Variations in bone status of contralateral and regional sites in young athletic women.

Authors:  E J Lee; K A Long; W L Risser; H B Poindexter; W E Gibbons; J Goldzieher
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Pre- and postmenopausal women have different bone mineral density responses to the same high-impact exercise.

Authors:  E J Bassey; M C Rothwell; J J Littlewood; D W Pye
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Environmental and genetic factors affecting bone mass. Similarity of bone density among members of healthy families.

Authors:  P Jouanny; F Guillemin; C Kuntz; C Jeandel; J Pourel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1995-01

10.  Peak bone mass from longitudinal data: implications for the prevalence, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Claudie Berger; David Goltzman; Lisa Langsetmo; Lawrence Joseph; Stuart Jackson; Nancy Kreiger; Alan Tenenhouse; K Shawn Davison; Robert G Josse; Jerilynn C Prior; David A Hanley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  14 in total

1.  Birth weight is more important for peak bone mineral content than for bone density: the PEAK-25 study of 1,061 young adult women.

Authors:  M Callréus; F McGuigan; K Åkesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Calcium and cholecalciferol supplementation provides no added benefit to nutritional counseling to improve bone mineral density in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Authors:  S C Kaste; A Qi; K Smith; H Surprise; E Lovorn; J Boyett; R J Ferry; M V Relling; S A Shurtleff; C H Pui; L Carbone; M M Hudson; K K Ness
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  The Affect of Lifestyle on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Turnover in Young Women.

Authors:  Natsuko Motooka; Hiroya Matsuo
Journal:  Kobe J Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-28

4.  Analysis of RAMP3 gene polymorphism with body composition and bone density in young and elderly women.

Authors:  Jai Prakash; Maria Herlin; Jitender Kumar; Gaurav Garg; Kristina E Akesson; Peter S Grabowski; Tim M Skerry; Gareth O Richards; Fiona E A McGuigan
Journal:  Gene X       Date:  2019-02-14

5.  Comparing the effects of Osteoporosis Prevention Exercise Protocol (OPEP) versus walking in the prevention of osteoporosis in younger females.

Authors:  Rabail Rani Soomro; Syed Imran Ahmed; Muhammad Khan; Syed Shahzad Ali
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and GIP receptor (GIPR) genes: An association analysis of polymorphisms and bone in young and elderly women.

Authors:  Gaurav Garg; Fiona E McGuigan; Jitender Kumar; Holger Luthman; Valeriya Lyssenko; Kristina Akesson
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2015-12-17

7.  Bone mineral density and body composition of adult premenopausal women with three levels of physical activity.

Authors:  Fernando D Saraví; Fabiana Sayegh
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2013-02-25

8.  Hydrotherapy as a recovery strategy after exercise: a pragmatic controlled trial.

Authors:  Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Alvaro Travé-Mesa; Alberto Vera-Cabrera; Dario Cruz-Terrón; Adelaida M Castro-Sánchez; Cesar Fernández-de-las-Peñas; Manuel Arroyo-Morales
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.659

9.  Like Mother, Like Daughter? Dietary and Non-Dietary Bone Fracture Risk Factors in Mothers and Their Daughters.

Authors:  Kamila Sobas; Lidia Wadolowska; Malgorzata Anna Slowinska; Magdalena Czlapka-Matyasik; Justyna Wuenstel; Ewa Niedzwiedzka
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.429

10.  Variation in the MC4R gene is associated with bone phenotypes in elderly Swedish women.

Authors:  Gaurav Garg; Jitender Kumar; Fiona E McGuigan; Martin Ridderstråle; Paul Gerdhem; Holger Luthman; Kristina Åkesson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.