Literature DB >> 26575558

Molecular simulation workflows as parallel algorithms: the execution engine of Copernicus, a distributed high-performance computing platform.

Sander Pronk1, Iman Pouya1, Magnus Lundborg2, Grant Rotskoff1, Björn Wesén1, Peter M Kasson3, Erik Lindahl1,2.   

Abstract

Computational chemistry and other simulation fields are critically dependent on computing resources, but few problems scale efficiently to the hundreds of thousands of processors available in current supercomputers-particularly for molecular dynamics. This has turned into a bottleneck as new hardware generations primarily provide more processing units rather than making individual units much faster, which simulation applications are addressing by increasingly focusing on sampling with algorithms such as free-energy perturbation, Markov state modeling, metadynamics, or milestoning. All these rely on combining results from multiple simulations into a single observation. They are potentially powerful approaches that aim to predict experimental observables directly, but this comes at the expense of added complexity in selecting sampling strategies and keeping track of dozens to thousands of simulations and their dependencies. Here, we describe how the distributed execution framework Copernicus allows the expression of such algorithms in generic workflows: dataflow programs. Because dataflow algorithms explicitly state dependencies of each constituent part, algorithms only need to be described on conceptual level, after which the execution is maximally parallel. The fully automated execution facilitates the optimization of these algorithms with adaptive sampling, where undersampled regions are automatically detected and targeted without user intervention. We show how several such algorithms can be formulated for computational chemistry problems, and how they are executed efficiently with many loosely coupled simulations using either distributed or parallel resources with Copernicus.

Year:  2015        PMID: 26575558     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  8 in total

1.  Perspective: Computer simulations of long time dynamics.

Authors:  Ron Elber
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Combining experimental and simulation data of molecular processes via augmented Markov models.

Authors:  Simon Olsson; Hao Wu; Fabian Paul; Cecilia Clementi; Frank Noé
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Continuous Evaluation of Ligand Protein Predictions: A Weekly Community Challenge for Drug Docking.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Wagner; Christopher P Churas; Shuai Liu; Robert V Swift; Michael Chiu; Chenghua Shao; Victoria A Feher; Stephen K Burley; Michael K Gilson; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Phase separation and toxicity of C9orf72 poly(PR) depends on alternate distribution of arginine.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Yoshiaki Yamanaka; Koji Ueda; Peiying Li; Tamami Miyagi; Yuichiro Harada; Sayaka Tezuka; Satoshi Narumi; Masahiro Sugimoto; Masahiko Kuroda; Yuhei Hayamizu; Kohsuke Kanekura
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 10.539

5.  gmxapi: A GROMACS-native Python interface for molecular dynamics with ensemble and plugin support.

Authors:  M Eric Irrgang; Caroline Davis; Peter M Kasson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Ensembler: Enabling High-Throughput Molecular Simulations at the Superfamily Scale.

Authors:  Daniel L Parton; Patrick B Grinaway; Sonya M Hanson; Kyle A Beauchamp; John D Chodera
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  Computational methods for exploring protein conformations.

Authors:  Jane R Allison
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 8.  Molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins and their interactions: from nanoscale to mesoscale.

Authors:  Matthieu Chavent; Anna L Duncan; Mark Sp Sansom
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 7.786

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.