Literature DB >> 26575547

Accurate description of intermolecular interactions involving ions using symmetry-adapted perturbation theory.

Ka Un Lao1, Rainer Schäffer2, Georg Jansen2, John M Herbert1.   

Abstract

Three new data sets for intermolecular interactions, AHB21 for anion-neutral dimers, CHB6 for cation-neutral dimers, and IL16 for ion pairs, are assembled here, with complete-basis CCSD(T) results for each. These benchmarks are then used to evaluate the accuracy of the single-exchange approximation that is used for exchange energies in symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT), and the accuracy of SAPT based on wave function and density-functional descriptions of the monomers is evaluated. High-level SAPT calculations afford poor results for these data sets, and this includes the recently proposed "gold", "silver", and "bronze standards" of SAPT, namely, SAPT2+(3)-δMP2/aug-cc-pVTZ, SAPT2+/aug-cc-pVDZ, and sSAPT0/jun-cc-pVDZ, respectively [ Parker , T. M. , et al. , J. Chem. Phys. 2014 , 140 , 094106 ]. Especially poor results are obtained for symmetric shared-proton systems of the form X(-)···H(+)···X(-), for X = F, Cl, or OH. For the anionic data set, the SAPT2+(CCD)-δMP2/aug-cc-pVTZ method exhibits the best performance, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.3 kcal/mol and a maximum error of 0.7 kcal/mol. For the cationic data set, the highest-level SAPT method, SAPT2+3-δMP2/aug-cc-pVQZ, outperforms the rest of the SAPT methods, with a MAE of 0.2 kcal/mol and a maximum error of 0.4 kcal/mol. For the ion-pair data set, the SAPT2+3-δMP2/aug-cc-pVTZ performs the best among all SAPT methods with a MAE of 0.3 kcal/mol and a maximum error of 0.9 kcal/mol. Overall, SAPT2+3-δMP2/aug-cc-pVTZ affords a small and balanced MAE (<0.5 kcal/mol) for all three data sets, with an overall MAE of 0.4 kcal/mol. Despite the breakdown of perturbation theory for ionic systems at short-range, SAPT can still be saved given two corrections: a "δHF" correction, which requires a supermolecular Hartree-Fock calculation to incorporate polarization effects beyond second order, and a "δMP2" correction, which requires a supermolecular MP2 calculation to account for higher-order induction-dispersion coupling. These corrections serve to remove artifacts introduced by the single exchange approximation in the exchange-induction and exchange-dispersion interactions, and obviate the need for ad hoc scaling of the first- and second-order exchange energies. Finally, some density-functional and MP2-based electronic structure methods are assessed as well, and we find that the best density-functional method for computing binding energies in these data sets is B97M-V/aug-cc-pVTZ, which affords a MAE of 0.4 kcal/mol, whereas complete-basis MP2 affords an MAE of 0.3 kcal/mol.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26575547     DOI: 10.1021/ct5010593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  12 in total

1.  Perspective: Quantum mechanical methods in biochemistry and biophysics.

Authors:  Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Survival of the most transferable at the top of Jacob's ladder: Defining and testing the ωB97M(2) double hybrid density functional.

Authors:  Narbe Mardirossian; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Psi4 1.4: Open-source software for high-throughput quantum chemistry.

Authors:  Daniel G A Smith; Lori A Burns; Andrew C Simmonett; Robert M Parrish; Matthew C Schieber; Raimondas Galvelis; Peter Kraus; Holger Kruse; Roberto Di Remigio; Asem Alenaizan; Andrew M James; Susi Lehtola; Jonathon P Misiewicz; Maximilian Scheurer; Robert A Shaw; Jeffrey B Schriber; Yi Xie; Zachary L Glick; Dominic A Sirianni; Joseph Senan O'Brien; Jonathan M Waldrop; Ashutosh Kumar; Edward G Hohenstein; Benjamin P Pritchard; Bernard R Brooks; Henry F Schaefer; Alexander Yu Sokolov; Konrad Patkowski; A Eugene DePrince; Uğur Bozkaya; Rollin A King; Francesco A Evangelista; Justin M Turney; T Daniel Crawford; C David Sherrill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Informing geometric deep learning with electronic interactions to accelerate quantum chemistry.

Authors:  Zhuoran Qiao; Anders S Christensen; Matthew Welborn; Frederick R Manby; Anima Anandkumar; Thomas F Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Strength, character, and directionality of halogen bonds involving cationic halogen bond donors.

Authors:  Kevin E Riley; Khanh-An Tran
Journal:  Faraday Discuss       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.008

6.  Advanced Electrostatic Model for Monovalent Ions Based on Ab Initio Energy Decomposition.

Authors:  Zhifeng Jing; Chengwen Liu; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 6.162

7.  A computational study of CH4 storage in porous framework materials with metalated linkers: connecting the atomistic character of CH4 binding sites to usable capacity.

Authors:  Ehud Tsivion; Jarad A Mason; Miguel I Gonzalez; Jeffrey R Long; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 8.  Quantum-Chemical Insights into the Self-Assembly of Carbon-Based Supramolecular Complexes.

Authors:  Joaquín Calbo; Juan Carlos Sancho-García; Enrique Ortí; Juan Aragó
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Optimization of the r2SCAN-3c Composite Electronic-Structure Method for Use with Slater-Type Orbital Basis Sets.

Authors:  Thomas Gasevic; Julius B Stückrath; Stefan Grimme; Markus Bursch
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 2.944

10.  Real single ion solvation free energies with quantum mechanical simulation.

Authors:  Timothy T Duignan; Marcel D Baer; Gregory K Schenter; Christopher J Mundy
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.