Literature DB >> 26575315

Better Informed Distance Geometry: Using What We Know To Improve Conformation Generation.

Sereina Riniker1, Gregory A Landrum2.   

Abstract

Small organic molecules are often flexible, i.e., they can adopt a variety of low-energy conformations in solution that exist in equilibrium with each other. Two main search strategies are used to generate representative conformational ensembles for molecules: systematic and stochastic. In the first approach, each rotatable bond is sampled systematically in discrete intervals, limiting its use to molecules with a small number of rotatable bonds. Stochastic methods, on the other hand, sample the conformational space of a molecule randomly and can thus be applied to more flexible molecules. Different methods employ different degrees of experimental data for conformer generation. So-called knowledge-based methods use predefined libraries of torsional angles and ring conformations. In the distance geometry approach, on the other hand, a smaller amount of empirical information is used, i.e., ideal bond lengths, ideal bond angles, and a few ideal torsional angles. Distance geometry is a computationally fast method to generate conformers, but it has the downside that purely distance-based constraints tend to lead to distorted aromatic rings and sp(2) centers. To correct this, the resulting conformations are often minimized with a force field, adding computational complexity and run time. Here we present an alternative strategy that combines the distance geometry approach with experimental torsion-angle preferences obtained from small-molecule crystallographic data. The torsional angles are described by a previously developed set of hierarchically structured SMARTS patterns. The new approach is implemented in the open-source cheminformatics library RDKit, and its performance is assessed by comparing the diversity of the generated ensemble and the ability to reproduce crystal conformations taken from the crystal structures of small molecules and protein-ligand complexes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26575315     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  59 in total

1.  Chemoselective Carbonyl Allylations with Alkoxyallylsiletanes.

Authors:  Paul Spaltenstein; Elizabeth J Cummins; Kelly-Marie Yokuda; Tim Kowalczyk; Timothy B Clark; Gregory W O'Neil
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.354

2.  Molecular Scaffold Hopping via Holistic Molecular Representation.

Authors:  Francesca Grisoni; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Computational Approach to Molecular Catalysis by 3d Transition Metals: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Konstantinos D Vogiatzis; Mikhail V Polynski; Justin K Kirkland; Jacob Townsend; Ali Hashemi; Chong Liu; Evgeny A Pidko
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Bioactive focus in conformational ensembles: a pluralistic approach.

Authors:  Matthew Habgood
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Docking rigid macrocycles using Convex-PL, AutoDock Vina, and RDKit in the D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Vladimir Chupin; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Sampling and refinement protocols for template-based macrocycle docking: 2018 D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Sergei Kotelnikov; Andrey Alekseenko; Cong Liu; Mikhail Ignatov; Dzmitry Padhorny; Emiliano Brini; Mark Lukin; Evangelos Coutsias; Ken A Dill; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Mechanism of allosteric inhibition in the Plasmodium falciparum cGMP-dependent protein kinase.

Authors:  Jung Ah Byun; Katherine Van; Jinfeng Huang; Philipp Henning; Eugen Franz; Madoka Akimoto; Friedrich W Herberg; Choel Kim; Giuseppe Melacini
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Use of molecular dynamics fingerprints (MDFPs) in SAMPL6 octanol-water log P blind challenge.

Authors:  Shuzhe Wang; Sereina Riniker
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Metadynamics as a Postprocessing Method for Virtual Screening with Application to the Pseudokinase Domain of JAK2.

Authors:  Kara J Cutrona; Ana S Newton; Stefan G Krimmer; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Predicting Molecular Energy Using Force-Field Optimized Geometries and Atomic Vector Representations Learned from an Improved Deep Tensor Neural Network.

Authors:  Jianing Lu; Cheng Wang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.