Literature DB >> 26575212

Activation of the motor cortex during phasic rapid eye movement sleep.

Fabrizio De Carli1, Paola Proserpio2, Elisa Morrone3, Ivana Sartori2, Michele Ferrara4, Steve Alex Gibbs2, Luigi De Gennaro5, Giorgio Lo Russo2, Lino Nobili1,2.   

Abstract

When dreaming during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, we can perform complex motor behaviors while remaining motionless. How the motor cortex behaves during this state remains unknown. Here, using intracerebral electrodes sampling the human motor cortex in pharmacoresistant epileptic patients, we report a pattern of electroencephalographic activation during REM sleep similar to that observed during the performance of a voluntary movement during wakefulness. This pattern is present during phasic REM sleep but not during tonic REM sleep, the latter resembling relaxed wakefulness. This finding may help clarify certain phenomenological aspects observed in REM sleep behavior disorder.
© 2016 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26575212      PMCID: PMC5066659          DOI: 10.1002/ana.24556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


Dreams are frequently reported by subjects awakened from rapid eye movement (REM) sleep.1, 2 In our dreams, we can move and perform various complex motor behaviors while being completely motionless due to an atonia of postural muscles.3 How the human motor cortex (Mc) behaves during this state from an electrophysiological point of view remains unknown. Clinical observations in patients with REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), a disease characterized by episodes of vigorous dream‐enacting behaviors due to a dysfunction of brainstem nuclei and subsequent loss of muscular atonia during REM sleep,4 suggest a direct activation of the Mc during REM sleep.5 Moreover, RBD‐associated behaviors are reported to occur more frequently during phasic REM sleep (where bursts of REMs occur) than during tonic REM sleep (where REM sleep occurs without actual REMs),6, 7 suggesting a higher level of activation of the Mc during phasic REM sleep. To evaluate the presence of different patterns of Mc activation during REM sleep, we analyzed the overnight intracerebral sleep stereo‐electroencephalographic (S‐EEG) activity of the primary Mc in 7 patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy undergoing presurgical assessment. We compared the mean S‐EEG power spectrum of the Mc during phasic and tonic REM sleep as well as in voluntary movement during wakefulness.

Subjects and Methods

Patients and Data Recording

Intracerebral S‐EEG data were recorded from 7 patients (5 males, 2 females; mean age = 28.0 ± 7.1 years) with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy who underwent S‐EEG during a presurgical evaluation.8 Informed written consent was obtained from all patients in accordance with the hospital's ethical committee policy (Niguarda Cà Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy). Patients included in this study shared the presence of electrode contact pairs unequivocally localized within the Mc and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFc; for further details, see Nobili et al9. The dlPFc was chosen because previous studies have shown that this region is representative of scalp sleep EEG dynamics across the night.9 No patients reported any history of sleep disorder. The activity recorded from Mc and dlPFc was free of ictal and interictal epileptic discharges. Two bipolar derivations between adjacent electrode contacts, localized within the paracentral lobule (leg motor area) and the dlPFc respectively, were considered. Electrophysiological activities acquired during both sleep and waking recording sessions included scalp EEG (Fz and Cz), bilateral electro‐ocular activity (EOG), and submental electromyographic activity (EMG). Electrophysiologic signals were digitally recorded with a minimum sampling rate of 512Hz following antialiasing analog filtering. Both intracerebral and scalp EEG signals were digitally filtered in the 0.2 to 70Hz passband, whereas EOG was 0.2 to 15Hz bandpass filtered and EMG was 5 to 150Hz bandpass filtered.

Sleep Scoring and Analysis of REM Sleep

Polysomnographic recordings were scored as 30‐second epochs.10 REM sleep was subdivided into phasic or tonic REM sleep. Phasic REM sleep epochs were selected on the basis of the presence of at least 3 REMs. Tonic REM sleep epochs were scored when they did not contain any eye movement but the EEG continued to show low‐amplitude, mixed‐frequency activity without K‐complexes or sleep spindles and the chin EMG tone remained low.10 Clear sequences of REMs, preceded by at least 10 seconds of silent EOG activity, were marked for further analysis (see below).

Analysis of Wakefulness States

Electrophysiological data were also acquired during wakefulness. While patients were resting, with eyes closed and lying on their back, they were requested to raise the leg corresponding to the motor area sampled with intracerebral electrodes. The onset of the movement was marked in the recording and selected for further analyses.

Spectral Analysis

Spectral analysis by Fourier transform (Welch method, Tukey window, 4‐second overlapping artifact‐free intervals) was performed to: (1) estimate the spectral distribution of EEG power for each 30‐second epoch of tonic and phasic REM sleep, (2) characterize the 8‐second epochs immediately preceding and following the onset of REM sequences during phasic REM sleep, and (3) characterize the 8‐second epochs immediately preceding and following the onset of leg movements during wakefulness. Due to the absence of artifacts in intracerebral recorded data, we could also perform spectral analysis of the intervals containing ocular movements.

Statistical Analysis

Mc and dlPFc mean spectra were computed in each subject for phasic and tonic REM sleep. Mc mean spectra were also computed for the epochs preceding and following the onset of selected REMs and for the epochs preceding and following the onset of voluntary leg movements in wakefulness. To verify the presence of frequency shifts in a large band (6–70Hz), each mean spectrum was characterized by its power‐weighted mean frequency,11 computed as: where p is the power density at the frequency f and the mean frequency f can be viewed as the barycenter of the frequency distribution. The effect of stage (phasic or tonic REM sleep) and region (Mc or dlPFc) was evaluated by a repeated measures analysis of variance followed by post hoc comparisons with Tukey adjustment. The same analysis was applied to evaluate spectral frequency changes associated with voluntary movements, by comparing the 8‐second intervals preceding and following movement onset. To verify whether differences in mean frequency between phasic and tonic REM sleep could be directly associated with ocular movements, mean frequency values associated with the 8‐second intervals preceding and following the onset of REM sequences were compared by paired t test. The significance threshold was set at 0.01. Statistical analyses were performed by means of the software package STATISTICA (version 10, StatSoft, www.statsoft.com).

Results

Activity of the Mc during Sleep

Figure 1A and B contain examples of a tonic and a phasic REM 30‐second epoch of the Mc in 1 subject. For each patient, a mean number of 72.14 (±19.01, standard deviation [SD]) epochs of tonic REM sleep and of 82.14 (±49.78, SD) epochs of phasic REM sleep were analyzed. Mean frequency spectral values were influenced by the phasic or tonic state of REM sleep (F 1,6 = 28.66, p < 0.002) but not by cortical topography (Mc vs dlPFc: F 1,6 = 0.094, not significant [NS]). However, an interaction between REM sleep state and cortical region was observed (F 1,6 = 28.30, p < 0.002). Post hoc comparisons showed that only the Mc presented higher mean frequency spectral values during phasic REM sleep when compared to tonic REM sleep (see Fig 1; Mc phasic: 20.45 ± 0.73Hz vs Mc tonic: 17.78 ± 0.47Hz, p < 0.002; dlPFc phasic: 19.56 ± 0.40Hz vs dlPFc tonic: 19.08 ± 0.46Hz, NS; mean ± standard error).
Figure 1

Example of tonic (A) and phasic (B) rapid eye movement (REM) 30‐second epochs. Each epoch shows 3 electroencephalographic (EEG) derivations: 2 electro‐oculographic (Eog) traces and 1 chin electromyographic (Emg) trace. (C) Mean EEG spectra of motor cortex (Mc) activity during tonic and phasic REM sleep. Notice the EEG desynchronization, characterized by the disappearance of the mu‐rhythm (alpha‐like oscillatory activity) during phasic REM sleep (B), reflected in C by a decrease of power in a large frequency band up to 25Hz, with a slight increase of power above 25Hz. PFc = dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Example of tonic (A) and phasic (B) rapid eye movement (REM) 30‐second epochs. Each epoch shows 3 electroencephalographic (EEG) derivations: 2 electro‐oculographic (Eog) traces and 1 chin electromyographic (Emg) trace. (C) Mean EEG spectra of motor cortex (Mc) activity during tonic and phasic REM sleep. Notice the EEG desynchronization, characterized by the disappearance of the mu‐rhythm (alpha‐like oscillatory activity) during phasic REM sleep (B), reflected in C by a decrease of power in a large frequency band up to 25Hz, with a slight increase of power above 25Hz. PFc = dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The comparison between the mean frequency values of Mc activity associated with the (8‐second) epochs preceding (Mcpre) and following (Mcpost) the onset of ocular movements did not show any significant difference (Mcpre: 19.98 ± 0.86Hz, Mcpost: 20.89 ± 1.08Hz; paired t test = 1.58, df = 6, NS; mean ± standard error).

Activity of the Mc during Wakefulness

For each patient we analyzed at least 2 leg movements (range = 2–10). A clear mu‐rhythm (6–12Hz) characterized the activity of the Mc during the premovement epoch and disappeared at movement onset, followed by a predominant shift toward higher‐frequency beta activity (Fig 2A).
Figure 2

Example of electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in the motor cortex (Mc) and in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) during rest and voluntary limb movements. (A) EEG trace derived from a bipolar derivation in the Mc and PFC during a 20‐second epoch around the onset of a voluntary leg movement (marked by the gray vertical bar). Notice the EEG desynchronization, characterized by the disappearance of the mu‐rhythm (alpha‐like oscillatory activity) after movement in the Mc. (B) Time–frequency distribution of the amplitude of the EEG signal recorded from the Mc derivation and averaged among four 20‐second epochs centered around leg movements. (C) Mean EEG spectra in the Mc showing a decrease of power in a large frequency band up to 25Hz and with a slight increase of power above 25Hz, during leg movement. ERSP = event‐related spectral power.

Example of electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in the motor cortex (Mc) and in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) during rest and voluntary limb movements. (A) EEG trace derived from a bipolar derivation in the Mc and PFC during a 20‐second epoch around the onset of a voluntary leg movement (marked by the gray vertical bar). Notice the EEG desynchronization, characterized by the disappearance of the mu‐rhythm (alpha‐like oscillatory activity) after movement in the Mc. (B) Time–frequency distribution of the amplitude of the EEG signal recorded from the Mc derivation and averaged among four 20‐second epochs centered around leg movements. (C) Mean EEG spectra in the Mc showing a decrease of power in a large frequency band up to 25Hz and with a slight increase of power above 25Hz, during leg movement. ERSP = event‐related spectral power. Mean frequency was significantly affected by condition (before or after movement onset: F 1,6 = 63.55, p < 0.001) and was not significantly different between regions (Mc vs dlPFc: F 1,6 = 0.41, NS), but the region × condition interaction was significant (F 1,6 = 40.62, p < 0.001). Post hoc comparisons showed that only the Mc presented significant changes between conditions (see Fig 2; Mc after movement: 20.81 ± 0.87Hz vs Mc before movement: 17.96 ± 0.81Hz, p < 0.001; dlPFc after movement: 19.18 ± 0.78Hz vs dlPFc before movement: 18.57 ± 0.55Hz, NS; mean ± standard error).

Discussion

It has been shown that, in contrast to rest condition, motor execution is characterized by a desynchronization of EEG activity as revealed by a disappearance of the typical mu‐rhythm and by a decrease in power of alpha and beta EEG frequency bands.12 Here we show that during phasic REM sleep the human Mc exhibits an EEG pattern similar to the one observed when the Mc is activated (ie, when performing a voluntary movement). Conversely, tonic REM sleep is characterized by the presence of a mu‐rhythm and by EEG spectral values similar to those observed during relaxed wakefulness (see Figs 1 and 2). Phasic REM sleep is characterized by higher EEG frequency values with respect to tonic REM sleep. These results are in accordance with animal studies showing an activation of sensorimotor regions during REM sleep,13 with higher frequencies in phasic REM sleep compared to tonic REM sleep.14 It has been observed that active dreams are more frequently reported by patients after an awakening from phasic REM sleep than after tonic REM sleep15, 16; our observations could represent the electrophysiological correlate of this finding. Although we did not collect dream reports in our patients, we can hypothesize a pattern of Mc activation occurring during dreamed movements, similar to the pattern observed during active wakefulness. Such an interpretation is in line with a functional magnetic resonance imaging and near‐infrared spectroscopy study in lucid dreamers showing that a predefined motor task performed during dreaming elicits a neuronal activation in the sensorimotor cortex that largely overlaps with the one observed during motor execution.17 Interestingly, a recent electrophysiological intracerebral study in humans showed that REMs in REM sleep are associated with visual‐like activity, as during wakefulness.18 From a clinical point of view, our results are also in accordance with a higher frequency of RBD manifestations during phasic than during tonic REM sleep,6, 7 in agreement with the current hypothesis that dream‐enacted behaviors occurring during REM sleep are correlated with a direct activation of the cortical sensorimotor system.5, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 Lastly, we did not find significant differences in the mean frequency values of EEG Mc activity when comparing the 8 seconds before and following the onset of ocular movements. This suggests that the activation of the Mc of the paracentral lobule (located far from the frontal eye field) is not related to the ocular movements per se, but seems to reflect a widespread involvement of the sensorimotor system during dream‐related behaviors. Such a finding could help explain why sporadic RBD episodes may also occur without concomitant REMs. Although technically challenging, future S‐EEG studies could further assess the relationship between dream content and the activity of more extensive cortical regions.

Author Contributions

F.D.C., L.N., M.F., and L.D.G. designed the study. G.L.R. performed the S‐EEG recordings. P.P., E.M., I.S., and G.L.R. collected the data. F.D.C., E.M., and S.A.G. conducted data analysis. F.D.C., L.N., P.P., S.A.G., M.F., and L.D.G. wrote the manuscript. All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Nothing to report.
  22 in total

Review 1.  REM sleep behavior disorder: clinical, developmental, and neuroscience perspectives 16 years after its formal identification in SLEEP.

Authors:  Carlos H Schenck; Mark W Mahowald
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Eye movements during active and passive dreams.

Authors:  R J BERGER; I OSWALD
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-08-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Dreamed movement elicits activation in the sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  Martin Dresler; Stefan P Koch; Renate Wehrle; Victor I Spoormaker; Florian Holsboer; Axel Steiger; Philipp G Sämann; Hellmuth Obrig; Michael Czisch
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Correlations between the same motor cortex cells and arm muscles during a trained task, free behavior, and natural sleep in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Andrew Jackson; Jaideep Mavoori; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The relation between abnormal behaviors and REM sleep microstructure in patients with REM sleep behavior disorder.

Authors:  Birgit Frauscher; Viola Gschliesser; Elisabeth Brandauer; Hanno Ulmer; Werner Poewe; Birgit Högl
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 6.  Control of sleep and wakefulness.

Authors:  Ritchie E Brown; Radhika Basheer; James T McKenna; Robert E Strecker; Robert W McCarley
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 7.  The functional significance of mu rhythms: translating "seeing" and "hearing" into "doing".

Authors:  Jaime A Pineda
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2005-05-31

8.  Stereoelectroencephalography: surgical methodology, safety, and stereotactic application accuracy in 500 procedures.

Authors:  Francesco Cardinale; Massimo Cossu; Laura Castana; Giuseppe Casaceli; Marco Paolo Schiariti; Anna Miserocchi; Dalila Fuschillo; Alessio Moscato; Chiara Caborni; Gabriele Arnulfo; Giorgio Lo Russo
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Dissociated wake-like and sleep-like electro-cortical activity during sleep.

Authors:  Lino Nobili; Michele Ferrara; Fabio Moroni; Luigi De Gennaro; Giorgio Lo Russo; Claudio Campus; Francesco Cardinale; Fabrizio De Carli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Restoration of normal motor control in Parkinson's disease during REM sleep.

Authors:  Valérie Cochen De Cock; Marie Vidailhet; Smaranda Leu; Antonio Texeira; Emmanuelle Apartis; Alexis Elbaz; Emmanuel Roze; Jean Claude Willer; Jean Philippe Derenne; Yves Agid; Isabelle Arnulf
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  15 in total

1.  Reduced Rapid Eye Movement Density in Parkinson Disease: A Polysomnography-Based Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Lynn A Schroeder; Olivier Rufra; Nicolas Sauvageot; François Fays; Vannina Pieri; Nico J Diederich
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Sleep efficiency and neurophysiological patterns in middle-aged men are associated with cognitive change over their adult life course.

Authors:  Markus Waser; Martin J Lauritzen; Birgitte Fagerlund; Merete Osler; Erik L Mortensen; Helge B D Sørensen; Poul Jennum
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.981

3.  Increased rapid eye movement density in Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease and RBD.

Authors:  Jun Zhu; Liyu Lu; Min Zhong; Xu Jiang; Zhuang Wu; Jingde Dong; Yang Pan; Li Zhang
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Sawtooth Waves Are Associated with Widespread Cortical Activations.

Authors:  Birgit Frauscher; Nicolás von Ellenrieder; Irena Dolezalova; Sarah Bouhadoun; Jean Gotman; Laure Peter-Derex
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Local aspects of sleep and wakefulness.

Authors:  Francesca Siclari; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 6.  REM sleep behaviour disorder.

Authors:  Yves Dauvilliers; Carlos H Schenck; Ronald B Postuma; Alex Iranzo; Pierre-Herve Luppi; Giuseppe Plazzi; Jacques Montplaisir; Bradley Boeve
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 52.329

7.  REM Sleep Microstates in the Human Anterior Thalamus.

Authors:  Péter Simor; Orsolya Szalárdy; Ferenc Gombos; Péter Przemyslaw Ujma; Zsófia Jordán; László Halász; Loránd Erőss; Dániel Fabó; Róbert Bódizs
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A high-density electroencephalography study reveals abnormal sleep homeostasis in patients with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder.

Authors:  Amandine Valomon; Brady A Riedner; Stephanie G Jones; Keith P Nakamura; Giulio Tononi; David T Plante; Ruth M Benca; Melanie Boly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Replay of innate vocal patterns during night sleep in suboscines.

Authors:  Juan F Döppler; Manon Peltier; Ana Amador; Franz Goller; Gabriel B Mindlin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.530

Review 10.  Rapid Eye Movements in Sleep Furnish a Unique Probe Into Consciousness.

Authors:  Charles C-H Hong; James H Fallon; Karl J Friston; James C Harris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.