Literature DB >> 26575187

Comparing Handheld Meters and Electronic Dosimeters for Measuring Ultraviolet Levels under Shade and in the Sun.

Suzanne Dobbinson1, Philippa Niven1, David Buller2, Martin Allen3, Peter Gies4, Charles Warne1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the validity, reliability and practicality of alternative portable methods for measuring erythemal UVR levels in passive recreation areas in public parks. UVR levels were measured for point in time comparisons between Solarmeter 6.5 handheld meters and time-stamped electronic dosimeters in a large central park in Melbourne, Australia. Observations were made at 20 locations in the park by two research assistants under two conditions: (1) matched shade (2) contrasting shade-no shade. Comparisons were also made with scientific instruments on the UVR monitoring station rooftop and by remotely selecting UV records and forecasts on cloud-free dates of park observations. There was good agreement between the portable UVR instruments in the park setting as confirmed via Bland Altman plots, while the dosimeter appeared less sensitive to change in shade conditions. The rooftop measurements showed that the Solarmeter 6.5 UVR readings were comparable to those of the adjacent rooftop instruments. The practicalities of using the dosimeters and Solarmeters for behavioral studies are discussed. These findings provide a basis for use of the Solarmeter 6.5 to measure changes in UVR levels due to different environmental conditions with relative accuracy for intervention studies in outdoor settings.
© 2015 The American Society of Photobiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26575187      PMCID: PMC5629966          DOI: 10.1111/php.12551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of tourists' UV exposure in Paris.

Authors:  E Mahé; M P Corrêa; S Godin-Beekmann; M Haeffelin; F Jégou; P Saiag; A Beauchet
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Enhanced UV exposure on a ski-field compared with exposures at sea level.

Authors:  Martin Allen; Richard McKenzie
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Patterns of real-time occupational ultraviolet radiation exposure among a sample of outdoor workers in New Zealand.

Authors:  V Hammond; A I Reeder; A Gray
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 2.427

4.  A sun holiday is a sunburn holiday.

Authors:  Bibi Petersen; Elisabeth Thieden; Peter Alshede Philipsen; Jakob Heydenreich; Antony Richard Young; Hans Christian Wulf
Journal:  Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.135

5.  Shade provision for toddlers at swimming pools in Melbourne.

Authors:  Peter Gies; Jennifer Makin; Suzanne Dobbinson; John Javorniczky; Stuart Henderson; Robert Guilfoyle; Jordan Lock
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Assessment of habitual sun exposure in adolescents via questionnaire--a comparison with objective measurement using polysulphone badges.

Authors:  T Dwyer; L Blizzard; P H Gies; R Ashbolt; C Roy
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Vitamin D level in summer and winter related to measured UVR exposure and behavior.

Authors:  Elisabeth Thieden; Peter A Philipsen; Jakob Heydenreich; Hans Christian Wulf
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.421

9.  Patterns in the received facial UV exposure of school children measured at a subtropical latitude.

Authors:  Nathan Downs; Alfio Parisi
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.421

10.  Sun exposure behaviour among subgroups of the Danish population. Based on personal electronic UVR dosimetry and corresponding exposure diaries.

Authors:  Elisabeth Thieden
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  2008-02
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Review of Wearable and Portable Sensors for Monitoring Personal Solar UV Exposure.

Authors:  Xiyong Huang; Andrew N Chalmers
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Rationale, design, and baseline data of a cross-national randomized trial on the effect of built shade in public parks for sun protection.

Authors:  David B Buller; Suzanne Dobbinson; Dallas R English; Melanie Wakefield; Mary Klein Buller
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Study protocol for a natural experiment in a lower socioeconomic area to examine the health-related effects of refurbishment to parks including built-shade (ShadePlus).

Authors:  S J Dobbinson; J Veitch; J Salmon; M Wakefield; P K Staiger; R J MacInnis; J Simmons
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  An Inexpensive High-Temporal Resolution Electronic Sun Journal for Monitoring Personal Day to Day Sun Exposure Patterns.

Authors:  Nathan J Downs; Alfio V Parisi; Harry Butler; Alex Rawlings; Raja Salem Elrahoumi
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-11-16

5.  The Melanoma Genomics Managing Your Risk Study randomised controlled trial: statistical analysis plan.

Authors:  Serigne N Lo; Amelia K Smit; David Espinoza; Anne E Cust
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Are Environmental Interventions Targeting Skin Cancer Prevention among Children and Adolescents Effective? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  K Thoonen; L van Osch; H de Vries; S Jongen; F Schneider
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Solar UV Measured under Built-Shade in Public Parks: Findings from a Randomized Trial in Denver and Melbourne.

Authors:  Suzanne Jane Dobbinson; David Bard Buller; James Andrew Chamberlain; Jody Simmons; Mary Klein Buller
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.