Literature DB >> 26574747

Demographic and Lifestyle Characteristics, but Not Apolipoprotein E Genotype, Are Associated with Intelligence among Young Chinese College Students.

Xiao-Fen Chen1, Zichen Wei1, Tingting Wang1, Zhen-Lian Zhang1, Yiwei Wang2, Michael G Heckman3, Nancy N Diehl3, Yun-Wu Zhang1, Huaxi Xu1, Guojun Bu1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intelligence is an important human feature that strongly affects many life outcomes, including health, life-span, income, educational and occupational attainments. People at all ages differ in their intelligence but the origins of these differences are much debated. A variety of environmental and genetic factors have been reported to be associated with individual intelligence, yet their nature and contribution to intelligence differences have been controversial.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the contribution of apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype, which is associated with the risk for Alzheimer's disease, as well as demographic and lifestyle characteristics, to the variation in intelligence.
METHODS: A total of 607 Chinese college students aged 18 to 25 years old were included in this prospective observational study. The Chinese revision of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (the fourth edition, short version) was used to determine the intelligence level of participants. Demographic and lifestyle characteristics data were obtained from self-administered questionnaires.
RESULTS: No significant association was found between APOE polymorphic alleles and different intelligence quotient (IQ) measures. Interestingly, a portion of demographic and lifestyle characteristics, including age, smoking and sleep quality were significantly associated with different IQ measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that demographic features and lifestyle characteristics, but not APOE genotype, are associated with intelligence measures among young Chinese college students. Thus, although APOE ε4 allele is a strong genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, it does not seem to impact intelligence at young ages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26574747      PMCID: PMC4648581          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Intelligence is the ability to learn from experience and to learn and adapt to changing environment. It predicts a wide range of social outcomes. People with higher intelligence tend to perform better in educational attainment, income, health and longevity [1]. Individuals differ from one another in their intellectual abilities, thus understanding the genetic and environmental risk factors that contribute to individual differences is of great interest to a wide range of researchers and to the general population. There are numerous studies reporting the associations between a biological variable and individual intelligence; however, findings of these studies are typically difficult to replicate [1-3]. Behavioral studies using twin-, family- and adoption-based designs suggest that a proportion of the population variance in intelligence was attributed to environmental and genetic differences [3, 4]. There are many different environmental influences that have been found to shape intelligence, including nutrition, education, pollution, drug and alcohol abuse [5-8]. However, no single gene or gene variant has been identified that is robustly associated with individual intelligence. An emerging finding was that older people with the ε4 allele of the gene for apolipoprotein E (APOE), a strong genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), are more likely to have faster cognitive decline [9, 10]. ApoE is a major cholesterol carrier and plays an important role in maintaining brain lipid homeostasis [11]. The human APOE gene exists as three polymorphic alleles—ε2 (Cys112, Cys158), ε3 (Cys112, Arg158), and ε4 (Arg112, Arg158)—which have a worldwide frequency of 8.4%, 77.9% and 13.7%, respectively [12]. APOE polymorphic alleles are the main genetic determinants of AD risk [13, 14]. The ε4 allele of APOE dramatically increases the risk of developing AD in a gene dose-dependent manner. The mean age of onset and frequency of AD are 68 years and 91% in ε4 homozygotes, 76 years and 47% in ε4 heterozygotes, 84 years and 20% in ε4 non-carriers [15]. Conversely, the ε2 allele of APOE has a protective effect against developing AD [12]. ApoE isoforms differentially regulate amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregation and clearance in the brain [16-18], and have distinct functions in regulating brain lipid transport [19], glucose metabolism [20], neuronal signaling [21], neuroinflammation [22], and mitochondrial function [23, 24]. Mechanistically, apoE isoforms appear to modulate the risk of AD through both Aβ-dependent and Aβ-independent pathways [25]. In addition to increasing the risk for AD, APOE ε4 allele also accelerates cognitive decline in elderly non-demented individuals [9, 10]. However, whether APOE genotype influences cognitive function or related measures at early ages is less clear. Studying the influence of APOE alleles on cognition at an early age is of particular interest as it would potentially aid mechanistic understanding of the function of apoE; however, there have been relatively few studies examining the association of APOE polymorphic alleles with cognitive function in young adults. Within the few existing literature, there remain large discrepancies concerning the effect of APOE genotype on cognitive performance in early life [26-29]. Therefore, in this study we sought to examine the associations between APOE genotype and intelligence-test scores among Chinese college students aged 18 to 25 years old. We also examined the associations of demographic and lifestyle characteristics with intelligence-test scores to further understand the mechanism underlying individual intelligence differences.

Materials and Methods

Approval for this study was obtained from the ethics committees of Xiamen University and AnFang College. All individuals who participated in this study gave written informed consent.

Study population

A total of 607 Chinese college students aged 18 to 25 years old from Xiamen University (N = 433) or AnFang College (N = 174) in the southeast city of Xiamen, Fujian Province were included in this prospective observational study. In addition to intelligence-test scores (intelligence quotient, IQ), demographic and lifestyle characteristics data were obtained from self-administered questionnaires. Demographic information was collected regarding age, gender, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI). Lifestyle factors that were collected included personality (introvert or extrovert), smoking (No or Yes), alcohol consumption (No or Yes), physical exercise (Often, once a week, once a month, or rare), and sleep quality (High, Intermediate, or Low).

Intelligence tests

The Chinese revision of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (the fourth edition, short version) was used to determine the intelligence level of participants. The scores are summed into four indexes (Verbal Comprehension Index or VCI, Working Memory Index or WMI, Processing Speed Index or PSI, and Perceptual Reasoning Index or PRI) and one Full Scale IQ which ranges from the lowest 72 to the highest 152 points.

APOE genotyping and quality control

Genomic DNA was extracted from saliva samples using a DNA extraction kit (Zeesan Biotech, Xiamen). Genotyping of the two APOE SNPs (rs429358:T/C and rs7412:C/T) was carried out using the APOE SNP genotyping kits (Memorigen Biotech, Xiamen, China) and the Applied Biosystems® 7500 Real-Time PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Data analysis was performed by measuring the allele-specific fluorescence. The genotyping analysis had been repeated at least twice, and was blind to different investigators. Additionally, three samples with known APOE genotypes were included in each assay. Finally, 10% of the total samples were randomly selected and retested with 100% concordance.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were summarized with the sample median, minimum, first quartile, third quartile, and maximum. Due to the small number of students with an ε4/ε4 genotype (N = 7), we utilized a dominant model (i.e. presence vs. absence of the ε4 allele) in all analyses where the primary interest was APOE ε4. Similarly, since only 4 students had an ɛ2/ɛ2 genotype, a dominant model was used in all analyses where the focus was APOE ɛ2. We examined the associations of APOE ε4 allele with Full Scale IQ and each of the four indexes using single variable (i.e. unadjusted) and multivariable linear regression models. Multivariable models were adjusted for school (Xiamen University or AnFang College), age, gender, height, weight, BMI, personality, smoking, drinking, physical exercise, and sleep quality in order to account for the potential confounding influences of these variables. Associations between APOE ε2 and IQ measures were evaluated in a similar manner. Associations of demographic and lifestyle characteristics with Full Scale IQ and each of the four indexes were also evaluated using single variable and multivariable linear regression models, where multivariable models were adjusted for age, gender, height, weight, BMI, personality, smoking, drinking, physical exercise, and sleep quality. Regression coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated in all linear regression analysis, where regression coefficients are interpreted as the change in the mean IQ measure corresponding to the specified increase (continuous variables) or presence of the given characteristic (categorical variables). In order to adjust for multiple testing, we utilized a Bonferroni correction separately for each group of similar tests. Specifically, p-values of 0.01 or lower were considered as statistically significant when evaluating the associations of APOE ε4 or ε2 with IQ measures (5 tests of association were performed for ε4 or ε2), while p-values of 0.005 or lower were considered as significant when examining associations of demographic and lifestyle characteristics with IQ measures (10 tests of association were performed for each IQ measure). All statistical analysis was performed using SAS (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina).

Results

Subject description

As shown in Table 1, median age was 20 (Range: 18–25), 263 subjects (43.3%) were male, and median BMI was 20.0 (Range: 14.5–35.5). The majority of subjects were extroverts (67.1%), do not smoke (81.7%), or drink alcohol (72.3%). The amount of physical exercise was most commonly often (32.9%) or once a week (32.3%), and sleep quality was either intermediate (60.5%) or high (27.4%) for most subjects. Median Full Scale IQ score was 112 (Range: 72–152), median VCI was 110 (Range: 65–140), median WMI was 110 (Range: 60–140), median PSI was 110 (Range: 55–145), and median PRI was 110 (Range: 65–130). APOE genotype distributions were ε2/ε2 for 4 students (0.7%), ε2/ε3 for 72 students (11.9%), ε2/ε4 for 12 students (2.0%), ε3/ε3 for 412 students (67.9%), ε3/ε4 for 100 students (16.5%), and ε4/ε4 for 7 students (1.2%). Therefore, allele frequencies for ɛ2, ɛ3 and ɛ4 were 7.6%, 82.0%, 10.4%, respectively.
Table 1

Student characteristics and IQ information.

VariableSummary (N = 607)
Age20 (18, 19, 22, 25)
Gender (Male)263 (43.3%)
Height (m)1.66 (1.48, 1.60, 1.73, 1.93)
Weight (kg)55 (34, 50, 62, 98)
BMI20.0 (14.5, 18.7, 21.7, 35.5)
APOE genotype
 ε2/ε24 (0.7%)
 ε2/ε372 (11.9%)
 e2/e412 (2.0%)
 ε3/ε3412 (67.9%)
 ε3/ε4100 (16.5%)
 ε4/ε47 (1.2%)
APOE allele frequency
 ɛ27.6%
 ɛ382.0%
 ɛ410.4%
Personality
 Extrovert381 (67.1%)
 Introvert187 (32.9%)
Smoking
 No470 (81.7%)
 Yes105 (18.3%)
Alcohol consumption
 No159 (27.7%)
 Yes416 (72.3%)
Physical exercise
 Often189 (32.9%)
 Once a week186 (32.3%)
 Once a month59 (10.3%)
 Rare141 (24.5%)
Sleep quality
 High157 (27.4%)
 Intermediate347 (60.5%)
 Low70 (12.2%)
Full Scale IQ Score112 (72, 100, 122, 152)
Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI)110 (65, 100, 120, 140)
Working Memory Index (WMI)110 (60, 95, 115, 140)
Processing Speed Index (PSI)110 (55, 100, 125, 145)
Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI)110 (65, 95, 125, 130)

Continuous variables are summarized with the sample median (minimum, first quartile, third quartile, maximum). Information was unavailable in some individuals regarding height (N = 32), weight (N = 35), BMI (N = 35), personality (N = 39), smoking (N = 32), drinking (N = 32), physical exercise (N = 32), and sleep quality (N = 33).

Continuous variables are summarized with the sample median (minimum, first quartile, third quartile, maximum). Information was unavailable in some individuals regarding height (N = 32), weight (N = 35), BMI (N = 35), personality (N = 39), smoking (N = 32), drinking (N = 32), physical exercise (N = 32), and sleep quality (N = 33).

Associations of subject demographic and lifestyle characteristics with IQ score measures

Associations of demographic and lifestyle factors with the five different IQ measures from multivariable analysis are displayed in Table 2 (Full Scale IQ, VCI, WMI) and Table 3 (PSI, PRI), where as previously mentioned p values of 0.005 or lower are considered as statistically significant after adjustment for multiple testing. Older age was significantly associated with a higher score for each IQ measure. Increased height was associated with a higher PRI. Smoking was associated with significantly lower scores for all IQ measures except PSI. Subjects with better sleep quality had a significantly higher score for Full Scale IQ, VCI and WMI. Gender, weight, BMI, personality, alcohol consumption, and physical exercise were not significantly associated with any IQ measures after adjustment for multiple testing. These results were relatively consistent in single variable analysis without adjustment for any confounding variables (S1 and S2 Tables).
Table 2

Associations of subject demographic and lifestyle characteristics with IQ score measures (Full Scale IQ Score, VCI, and WMI) from multivariable analysis.

Association with Full Scale IQ scoreAssociation with VCIAssociation with WMI
VariableRegression coefficient (95% CI)P-valueRegression coefficient (95% CI)P-valueRegression coefficient (95% CI)P-value
Age (1 year increase)2.30 (1.74, 2.87)<0.0012.59 (2.02, 3.16)<0.0012.77 (2.19, 3.34)<0.001
Gender (Male)-1.28 (-5.14, 2.59)0.521.03 (-2.91, 4.98)0.611.76 (-2.19, 5.71)0.38
Height (0.1 m increase)2.78 (0.53, 5.02)0.0152.40 (0.11, 4.68)0.0400.93 (-1.37, 3.23)0.43
Weight (10 kg increase)1.06 (-0.47, 2.60)0.171.19 (-0.37, 2.75)0.130.90 (-0.66, 2.45)0.26
BMI (5 unit increase)0.61 (-1.91, 3.12)0.631.00 (-1.55, 3.56)0.441.34 (-1.21, 3.89)0.30
Personality (Introvert)0.10 (-2.47, 2.66)0.94-0.71 (-3.32, 1.91)0.60-0.12 (-2.75, 2.50)0.93
Smoking
 No0.00 (reference)N/A0.00 (reference)N/A0.00 (reference)N/A
 Yes-8.61 (-12.05, -5.16)<0.001-7.17 (-10.68, -3.66)<0.001-8.47 (-11.99, -4.95)<0.001
Alcohol consumption
 No0.00 (reference)N/A0.00 (reference)N/A0.00 (reference)N/A
 Yes-2.65 (-5.41, 0.11)0.060-2.91 (-5.72, -0.10)0.043-3.17 (-5.98, -0.35)0.028
Physical exerciseTest of overall difference: P = 0.008Test of overall difference: P = 0.012Test of overall difference: P = 0.023
 Often0.00 (reference)N/A0.00 (reference)N/A0.00 (reference)N/A
 Once a week1.89 (-0.96, 4.75)0.192.40 (-0.51, 5.32)0.112.04 (-0.88, 4.96)0.17
 Once a month-0.13 (-4.29, 4.03)0.951.60 (-2.64, 5.83)0.461.02 (-3.23, 5.27)0.64
 Rare-3.66 (-6.95, -0.37)0.029-2.85 (-6.20, 0.50)0.095-2.95 (-6.31, 0.41)0.085
Sleep qualityTest of overall difference: P<0.001Test of overall difference: P<0.001Test of overall difference: P = 0.004
 High0.00 (reference)N/A0.00 (reference)N/A0.00 (reference)N/A
 Intermediate-5.83 (-8.46, -3.20)<0.001-6.52 (-9.20, -3.84)<0.001-4.47 (-7.15, -1.78)0.001
 Low-5.84 (-9.97, -1.71)0.006-6.82 (-11.03, -2.60)0.002-2.18 (-6.41, 2.04)0.31

Regression coefficients, 95% CIs, and p values were calculated from multivariable linear regression models. Regression coefficients are interpreted as the change in the mean IQ measure corresponding to the increase specified in parenthesis (continuous variables) or presence of the given characteristic (categorical variables). For all variables except height, weight, and BMI, models were adjusted for age, gender, height, weight, BMI, personality, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, and sleep quality. For height, weight, and BMI, models were adjusted for age, gender, personality, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, and sleep quality. P values of 0.005 or lower were considered as statistically significant after applying a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. CI = confidence interval.

Table 3

Associations of subject demographic and lifestyle characteristics with IQ score measures (PSI and PRI) from multivariable analysis.

Association with PSIAssociation with PRI
VariableRegression coefficient (95% CI)P-valueRegression coefficient (95% CI)P-value
Age (1 year increase)0.89 (0.29, 1.50)0.0040.95 (0.32, 1.59)0.003
Gender (Male)-4.54 (-8.71, -0.38)0.033-2.33 (-6.69, 2.03)0.29
Height (0.1 m increase)1.06 (-1.36, 3.49)0.394.07 (1.53, 6.60)0.002
Weight (10 kg increase)-0.82 (-2.46, 0.83)0.332.16 (0.44, 3.89)0.01
BMI (5 unit increase)-1.97 (-4.67, 0.72)0.151.87 (-0.97, 4.72)0.20
Personality (Introvert)-0.51 (-3.27, 2.25)0.721.59 (-1.30, 4.48)0.28
Smoking
 No0.00 (reference)N/A0.00 (reference)N/A
 Yes-4.27 (-7.98, -0.56)0.024-6.29 (-10.18, -2.40)0.002
Alcohol consumption
 No0.00 (reference)N/A0.00 (reference)N/A
 Yes-0.97 (-3.94, 2.00)0.52-1.37 (-4.48, 1.74)0.39
Physical exerciseTest of overall difference: P = 0.22Test of overall difference: P = 0.33
 Often0.00 (reference)N/A0.00 (reference)N/A
 Once a week0.46 (-2.62, 3.54)0.770.95 (-2.27, 4.18)0.56
 Once a month-1.82 (-6.30, 2.65)0.42-0.57 (-5.26, 4.11)0.81
 Rare-2.97 (-6.50, 0.57)0.10-2.41 (-6.12, 1.29)0.20
Sleep qualityTest of overall difference: P = 0.024Test of overall difference: P = 0.058
 High0.00 (reference)N/A0.00 (reference)N/A
 Intermediate-3.48 (-6.31, -0.65)0.016-3.47 (-6.44, -0.51)0.022
 Low-5.08 (-9.53, -0.63)0.025-3.86 (-8.52, 0.80)0.10

Regression coefficients, 95% CIs, and p values were calculated from multivariable linear regression models. Regression coefficients are interpreted as the change in the mean IQ measure corresponding to the increase specified in parenthesis (continuous variables) or presence of the given characteristic (categorical variables). For all variables except height, weight, and BMI, models were adjusted for age, gender, height, weight, BMI, personality, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, and sleep quality. For height, weight, and BMI, models were adjusted for age, gender, personality, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, and sleep quality. P values of 0.005 or lower were considered as statistically significant after applying a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. CI = confidence interval.

Regression coefficients, 95% CIs, and p values were calculated from multivariable linear regression models. Regression coefficients are interpreted as the change in the mean IQ measure corresponding to the increase specified in parenthesis (continuous variables) or presence of the given characteristic (categorical variables). For all variables except height, weight, and BMI, models were adjusted for age, gender, height, weight, BMI, personality, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, and sleep quality. For height, weight, and BMI, models were adjusted for age, gender, personality, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, and sleep quality. P values of 0.005 or lower were considered as statistically significant after applying a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. CI = confidence interval. Regression coefficients, 95% CIs, and p values were calculated from multivariable linear regression models. Regression coefficients are interpreted as the change in the mean IQ measure corresponding to the increase specified in parenthesis (continuous variables) or presence of the given characteristic (categorical variables). For all variables except height, weight, and BMI, models were adjusted for age, gender, height, weight, BMI, personality, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, and sleep quality. For height, weight, and BMI, models were adjusted for age, gender, personality, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, and sleep quality. P values of 0.005 or lower were considered as statistically significant after applying a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. CI = confidence interval.

Associations of APOE genotype with subject IQ score measures

An evaluation of the association between APOE ε4 allele and each of the five different IQ measures was shown in Table 4. In single variable (i.e. unadjusted) analysis, there was no evidence of an association between APOE ε4 and Full Scale IQ (P = 0.70), VCI (P = 0.43), WMI (P = 0.44), PSI (P = 0.57), PRI (P = 0.94). This lack of an association between APOE ε4 and the different IQ measures was consistent in multivariable analysis which adjusts for the potential confounding influences of school, age, gender, height, weight, BMI, personality, smoking, drinking, physical exercise, and sleep quality (all P≥0.20, Table 4). Similarly, there was no evidence of an association between APOE ε2 and any of the IQ measures that were considered, either in single variable analysis (P≥0.091, Table 5) or in multivariable analysis adjusting for the aforementioned eleven factors (P≥0.29, Table 5).
Table 4

Associations between APOE ε4 and IQ score measures.

Association between APOE ε4 and the given IQ measure
Median (Min, Q1, Q3, Max)Single variable analysisMultivariable analysis
IQ measureε4 allele not present (N = 488)ε4 allele present (N = 119)Regression coefficient (95% CI)P-valueRegression coefficient (95% CI)P-value
Full Scale IQ Score112 (72, 100, 121, 152)115 (74, 97, 122, 140)-0.59 (-3.62, 2.45)0.700.59 (-1.53, 2.71)0.58
Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI)110 (65, 100, 120, 140)110 (70, 95, 120, 135)-1.26 (-4.36, 1.85)0.430.08 (-2.21, 2.37)0.94
Working Memory Index (WMI)110 (60, 95, 115, 140)105 (70, 95, 115, 140)-1.22 (-4.35, 1.91)0.440.22 (-2.07, 2.51)0.85
Processing Speed Index (PSI)110 (55, 100, 120, 145)110 (80, 100, 125, 145)0.89 (-2.21, 3.99)0.571.95 (-1.00, 4.90)0.20
Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI)110 (70, 95, 120, 140)110 (65, 95, 120, 145)-0.12 (-3.29, 3.05)0.94-0.06 (-2.96, 2.84)0.97

Regression coefficients, 95% CIs, and p values were calculated from linear regression models. Regression coefficients are interpreted as the difference in means of the given IQ measure between carriers and non-carriers of the ε4 allele (i.e. ε4 allele present vs. ε4 allele not present). A regression coefficient greater than “0” indicates a higher value of the given measure for ε4 carriers, and a regression coefficient less than “0” indicates a lower value of the given measure for ε4 carriers. Multivariable models were adjusted for school (Xiamen University or AnFang College), age, gender, height, weight, BMI, personality, smoking, drinking alcohol, physical exercise, and sleep quality. P values of 0.01 or lower were considered as statistically significant after applying a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Min = Minimum; Q1 = first quartile; Q3 = third quartile; Max = Maximum; CI = confidence interval.

Table 5

Associations between APOE ε2 and IQ score measures.

Association between APOE ε4 and the given IQ measure
Median (Min, Q1, Q3, Max)Single variable analysisMultivariable analysis
IQ measureε2 allele not present (N = 519)ε2 allele present (N = 88)Regression coefficient (95% CI)P-valueRegression coefficient (95% CI)P-value
Full Scale IQ Score112 (72, 100, 120, 152)114 (76, 104, 122, 134)1.16 (-2.27, 4.58)0.510.03 (-2.41, 2.48)0.98
Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI)110 (65, 100, 120, 140)110 (65, 98, 120, 130)-0.03 (-3.53, 3.47)0.99-0.70 (-3.33, 1.94)0.60
Working Memory Index (WMI)110 (60, 95, 115, 140)110 (65, 100, 115, 140)0.68 (-2.85, 4.21)0.70-0.11 (-2.75, 2.53)0.93
Processing Speed Index (PSI)110 (55, 100, 125, 145)115 (80, 105, 125, 145)3.00 (-0.48, 6.49)0.0911.85 (-1.56, 5.25)0.29
Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI)110 (65, 95, 120, 145)110 (70, 95, 120, 135)0.16 (-3.42, 3.73)0.93-0.80 (-4.14, 2.53)0.64

Regression coefficients, 95% CIs, and p values were calculated from linear regression models. Regression coefficients are interpreted as the difference in means of the given IQ measure between carriers and non-carriers of the ε2 allele (i.e. ε2 allele present vs. ε2 allele not present). A regression coefficient greater than “0” indicates a higher value of the given measure for ε2 carriers, and a regression coefficient less than “0” indicates a lower value of the given measure for ε2 carriers. Multivariable models were adjusted for school (Xiamen University or AnFang College), age, gender, height, weight, BMI, personality, smoking, drinking alcohol, physical exercise, and sleep quality. P values of 0.01 or lower were considered as statistically significant after applying a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Min = Minimum; Q1 = first quartile; Q3 = third quartile; Max = Maximum; CI = confidence interval.

Regression coefficients, 95% CIs, and p values were calculated from linear regression models. Regression coefficients are interpreted as the difference in means of the given IQ measure between carriers and non-carriers of the ε4 allele (i.e. ε4 allele present vs. ε4 allele not present). A regression coefficient greater than “0” indicates a higher value of the given measure for ε4 carriers, and a regression coefficient less than “0” indicates a lower value of the given measure for ε4 carriers. Multivariable models were adjusted for school (Xiamen University or AnFang College), age, gender, height, weight, BMI, personality, smoking, drinking alcohol, physical exercise, and sleep quality. P values of 0.01 or lower were considered as statistically significant after applying a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Min = Minimum; Q1 = first quartile; Q3 = third quartile; Max = Maximum; CI = confidence interval. Regression coefficients, 95% CIs, and p values were calculated from linear regression models. Regression coefficients are interpreted as the difference in means of the given IQ measure between carriers and non-carriers of the ε2 allele (i.e. ε2 allele present vs. ε2 allele not present). A regression coefficient greater than “0” indicates a higher value of the given measure for ε2 carriers, and a regression coefficient less than “0” indicates a lower value of the given measure for ε2 carriers. Multivariable models were adjusted for school (Xiamen University or AnFang College), age, gender, height, weight, BMI, personality, smoking, drinking alcohol, physical exercise, and sleep quality. P values of 0.01 or lower were considered as statistically significant after applying a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Min = Minimum; Q1 = first quartile; Q3 = third quartile; Max = Maximum; CI = confidence interval.

Discussion

In this study, we analyzed the associations among APOE genotype, demographic and lifestyle characteristics, and intelligence scores in a cohort of 607 Chinese college students aged 18 to 25 years old. We found that neither APOE ε4 nor ε2 has significant association with different IQ measures either in single variable or multivariable analysis which adjusts for potentially confounding variables. Interestingly, demographic and lifestyle characteristics, including age, smoking and sleep quality, were significantly associated with different IQ measures. Human apoE is polymorphic with three common isoforms that have different effects on lipid and neuronal homeostasis. APOE ε3 is the most common and ε2 is the least common allele. The APOE allele frequency for ε2, ε3 and ε4 in our Chinese Han population was 7.6%, 82.0%, 10.4%, respectively. Thus, the frequency of the ε4 allele was lower than that for the world-wide population (8.4%, 77.9% and 13.7%for ε2, ε3 and ε4, respectively) [12]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that APOE ε4 has extensive deleterious effects on several biological processes. The possession of at least one ε4 allele increases three-fold for the risk of AD [30]. Moreover, APOE ε4 appears to be less efficient in delivering cholesterol and essential lipids for maintenance of synaptic integrity and plasticity than APOE ε2 and ε3 [31, 32]. APOE ε4 has also been experimentally related to exacerbated pro-inflammatory and/or reduced anti-inflammatory functions [22, 33]. However, APOE ε4 seems to be protective against infectious diseases such as hepatitis C virus and malaria [34, 35]. The effect of the APOE ε4 allele on cognitive function in the elder people is well-characterized [9, 10], but the few studies that examined the role of APOE ε4 on cognitive abilities in young population reported inconsistent results. Young adults and children carrying the ε4 allele were reported to exhibit better cognitive performance compared to non-ε4 carriers [26, 27, 36]. Equally though, there are studies which found no benefits of the ɛ4 allele for cognition in early adulthood [37-39]. The discrepancy among results from different studies might be attributed to variation in the sample size or ethnic population. Our study in a cohort of 607 young adults of the Chinese Han population revealed no evidence that cognitive performance was related to the APOE genotype. We found evidence of associations between demographic and lifestyle characteristics with different IQ measures. Intriguingly, smoking was found to be associated with significantly lower IQ scores. The relatively small sample size of our studied population would not allow us to distinguish heavy or light smokers according to the amount of cigarette consumption. Nonetheless, our results are consistent with previous report that smoking was associated with impairments in cognitive function [40]. We also observed that students with better sleep quality tend to score higher in Full Scale IQ, VCI and WMI, indicating a positive association between sleep quality and cognitive function as previously reported [41]. Sleep quality has been suggested to impact hippocampal activation and memory performance [42, 43]. There is compelling evidence showing that sleep promotes memory consolidation and brain plasticity [44-46]. The mechanism remains unclear, but may involve local synaptic changes. Therefore, a portion of individual intelligence differences in our studied population might be attributed to their demographic and lifestyle characteristics, including age, smoking and sleep quality. Future extension of these findings is necessary to clarify whether the demographic and lifestyle factors are the primary cause or merely a downstream consequence of different IQ levels. In summary, the results of our current study indicate that the APOE ε4 allele, a major genetic risk factor for AD, is not notably associated with IQ scores in a cohort of 607 Chinese college students aged 18 to 25 years old. Although we cannot exclude the possibility of a small association between APOE ε4 and IQ scores given our results, based on 95% confidence limits we can reasonably conclude that a moderate or strong association is unlikely. Similarly, the APOE ε2 did not appear to be associated with any of the IQ measures that were examined. However, we did identified several significant associations of demographic and lifestyle characteristics with the different IQ measures. This study partially advances the understanding of individual intelligence differences and might help to ameliorate declines in cognitive function by adjusting lifestyles.

Associations of subject demographic and lifestyle characteristics with IQ score measures (IQ Full Scale score, VVI, and WMI) from single variable analysis.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Associations of subject demographic and lifestyle characteristics with IQ score measures (PSI and PRI)) from single variable analysis.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  45 in total

Review 1.  Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: risk, mechanisms and therapy.

Authors:  Chia-Chen Liu; Chia-Chan Liu; Takahisa Kanekiyo; Huaxi Xu; Guojun Bu
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in late onset families.

Authors:  E H Corder; A M Saunders; W J Strittmatter; D E Schmechel; P C Gaskell; G W Small; A D Roses; J L Haines; M A Pericak-Vance
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  APOE genotype and an ApoE-mimetic peptide modify the systemic and central nervous system inflammatory response.

Authors:  John R Lynch; Wen Tang; Haichen Wang; Michael P Vitek; Ellen R Bennett; Patrick M Sullivan; David S Warner; Daniel T Laskowitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Apolipoprotein E genotype predicts 24-month bayley scales infant development score.

Authors:  Robert O Wright; Howard Hu; Edwin K Silverman; Shirng W Tsaih; Joel Schwartz; David Bellinger; Eduardo Palazuelos; Scott T Weiss; Mauricio Hernandez-Avila
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 3.756

5.  Association of apolipoprotein E allele epsilon 4 with late-onset familial and sporadic Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  A M Saunders; W J Strittmatter; D Schmechel; P H George-Hyslop; M A Pericak-Vance; S H Joo; B L Rosi; J F Gusella; D R Crapper-MacLachlan; M J Alberts
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Apolipoprotein E: cholesterol transport protein with expanding role in cell biology.

Authors:  R W Mahley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Apolipoprotein E4 prevents growth of malaria at the intraerythrocyte stage: implications for differences in racial susceptibility to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Hisashi Fujioka; Clyde F Phelix; Robert P Friedland; Xiongwei Zhu; Elizabeth A Perry; Rudy J Castellani; George Perry
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2013-11

8.  Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis. APOE and Alzheimer Disease Meta Analysis Consortium.

Authors:  L A Farrer; L A Cupples; J L Haines; B Hyman; W A Kukull; R Mayeux; R H Myers; M A Pericak-Vance; N Risch; C M van Duijn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Oct 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Sleep-dependent learning and memory consolidation.

Authors:  Matthew P Walker; Robert Stickgold
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  ApoE4 induces Aβ42, tau, and neuronal pathology in the hippocampus of young targeted replacement apoE4 mice.

Authors:  Ori Liraz; Anat Boehm-Cagan; Daniel M Michaelson
Journal:  Mol Neurodegener       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 14.195

View more
  3 in total

1.  Body mass index and height in relation to type 2 diabetes by levels of intelligence and education in a large cohort of Danish men.

Authors:  Lise G Bjerregaard; Mille L Damborg; Merete Osler; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Jennifer L Baker
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Enhanced Diabetes Susceptibility in Community Dwelling Han Elders Carrying the Apolipoprotein E 3/3 Genotype.

Authors:  Chun-Xia Ban; Li Zhong; Tao Wang; Min-Jie Zhu; Jing-Hua Wang; Zhen-Lian Zhang; Zhe Wang; Ning Su; Yuan-Yuan Liu; Yan-Chen Shi; Shi-Fu Xiao; Xia Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  APOE2: protective mechanism and therapeutic implications for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Zonghua Li; Francis Shue; Na Zhao; Mitsuru Shinohara; Guojun Bu
Journal:  Mol Neurodegener       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 18.879

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.