OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships between apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 dose and in vivo distributions of both fibrillary amyloid burden and glucose metabolism in the same Alzheimer disease dementia patients, selected for abnormal amyloid imaging. METHODS: Twenty-two APOE ε4 negative, 40 heterozygous, and 22 homozygous Alzheimer disease dementia patients underwent dynamic (90 minutes) [(11)C]Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) and static [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scans. Parametric nondisplaceable binding potential images of [(11)C]PIB and standardized uptake value ratio images of [(18)F]FDG were generated using cerebellar gray matter as reference tissue. Frontal, parietal, temporal, posterior cingulate, and occipital cortices were selected as regions of interest. RESULTS: Multivariate general linear models with adjustment for age, sex, and Mini-Mental State Examination showed main effects of APOE ε4 dose on distributions of both [(11)C]PIB (p for trend <0.05) and [(18)F]FDG (p for trend <0.01). More specifically, a univariate general linear model of individual regions showed increased [(11)C]PIB binding in frontal cortex of APOE ε4 noncarriers compared with APOE ε4 carriers (p < 0.05). In contrast, APOE ε4 carriers had reduced [(18)F]FDG uptake in occipital cortex (p < 0.05) and a borderline significant effect in posterior cingulate (p = 0.07) in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSION: We found a reversed APOE ε4 dose effect for amyloid deposition in the frontal lobe, whereas APOE ε4 carriership was associated with more profound metabolic impairment in posterior parts of the cortex. These findings suggest that APOE genotype has a differential effect on the distribution of amyloid plaques and glucose metabolism. This may have important implications for emerging therapies that aim to directly intervene in the disease process.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships between apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 dose and in vivo distributions of both fibrillary amyloid burden and glucose metabolism in the same Alzheimer disease dementiapatients, selected for abnormal amyloid imaging. METHODS: Twenty-two APOE ε4 negative, 40 heterozygous, and 22 homozygous Alzheimer disease dementiapatients underwent dynamic (90 minutes) [(11)C]Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) and static [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scans. Parametric nondisplaceable binding potential images of [(11)C]PIB and standardized uptake value ratio images of [(18)F]FDG were generated using cerebellar gray matter as reference tissue. Frontal, parietal, temporal, posterior cingulate, and occipital cortices were selected as regions of interest. RESULTS: Multivariate general linear models with adjustment for age, sex, and Mini-Mental State Examination showed main effects of APOE ε4 dose on distributions of both [(11)C]PIB (p for trend <0.05) and [(18)F]FDG (p for trend <0.01). More specifically, a univariate general linear model of individual regions showed increased [(11)C]PIB binding in frontal cortex of APOE ε4 noncarriers compared with APOE ε4 carriers (p < 0.05). In contrast, APOE ε4 carriers had reduced [(18)F]FDG uptake in occipital cortex (p < 0.05) and a borderline significant effect in posterior cingulate (p = 0.07) in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSION: We found a reversed APOE ε4 dose effect for amyloid deposition in the frontal lobe, whereas APOE ε4 carriership was associated with more profound metabolic impairment in posterior parts of the cortex. These findings suggest that APOE genotype has a differential effect on the distribution of amyloid plaques and glucose metabolism. This may have important implications for emerging therapies that aim to directly intervene in the disease process.
Authors: Katerina Markopoulou; Joanna M Biernacka; Sebastian M Armasu; Kari J Anderson; J Eric Ahlskog; Bruce A Chase; Sun Ju Chung; Julie M Cunningham; Matthew Farrer; Roberta Frigerio; Demetrius M Maraganore Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: Keith A Josephs; Joseph R Duffy; Edythe A Strand; Mary M Machulda; Matthew L Senjem; Val J Lowe; Clifford R Jack; Jennifer L Whitwell Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2014-06-28 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Rik Ossenkoppele; Yolande A L Pijnenburg; David C Perry; Brendan I Cohn-Sheehy; Nienke M E Scheltens; Jacob W Vogel; Joel H Kramer; Annelies E van der Vlies; Renaud La Joie; Howard J Rosen; Wiesje M van der Flier; Lea T Grinberg; Annemieke J Rozemuller; Eric J Huang; Bart N M van Berckel; Bruce L Miller; Frederik Barkhof; William J Jagust; Philip Scheltens; William W Seeley; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Brain Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Rik Ossenkoppele; Daniel R Schonhaut; Michael Schöll; Samuel N Lockhart; Nagehan Ayakta; Suzanne L Baker; James P O'Neil; Mustafa Janabi; Andreas Lazaris; Averill Cantwell; Jacob Vogel; Miguel Santos; Zachary A Miller; Brianne M Bettcher; Keith A Vossel; Joel H Kramer; Maria L Gorno-Tempini; Bruce L Miller; William J Jagust; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Brain Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Ethan A Winkler; Yoichiro Nishida; Abhay P Sagare; Sanket V Rege; Robert D Bell; David Perlmutter; Jesse D Sengillo; Sara Hillman; Pan Kong; Amy R Nelson; John S Sullivan; Zhen Zhao; Herbert J Meiselman; Rosalinda B Wendy; Jamie Soto; E Dale Abel; Jacob Makshanoff; Edward Zuniga; Darryl C De Vivo; Berislav V Zlokovic Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Manja Lehmann; Pia M Ghosh; Cindee Madison; Anna Karydas; Giovanni Coppola; James P O'Neil; Yadong Huang; Bruce L Miller; William J Jagust; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Rik Ossenkoppele; Brendan I Cohn-Sheehy; Renaud La Joie; Jacob W Vogel; Christiane Möller; Manja Lehmann; Bart N M van Berckel; William W Seeley; Yolande A Pijnenburg; Maria L Gorno-Tempini; Joel H Kramer; Frederik Barkhof; Howard J Rosen; Wiesje M van der Flier; William J Jagust; Bruce L Miller; Philip Scheltens; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 5.038