D M Wood1, B Ceronie2, P I Dargan3. 1. From the Clinical Toxicology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's Health Partners Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK David.Wood@gstt.nhs.uk. 2. Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK. 3. From the Clinical Toxicology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's Health Partners Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The features of acute classical recreational drugs or new psychoactive substances (NPS) toxicity fall into three broad groups: (i) stimulant; (ii) hallucinogenic and (iii) depressant. Currently, there is no information available on healthcare professionals knowledge/confidence in managing the acute toxicity related to NPS use. AIM: We have compared knowledge and confidence of managing acute toxicity related to use of NPS with that seen with the use of to classical recreational drugs. DESIGN AND METHODS: Physicians/nurses completed a questionnaire survey to self-assess on a 5-point scale their knowledge (1-little knowledge; 5-very knowledgeable) and confidence (1-little confidence; 5-very confident) of managing acute toxicity related to the use of classical recreational drugs or NPS. Differences between knowledge and confidence for classical recreational drugs and NPS were assessed using paired Student's t-test; comparison between doctors, nurses and the frequency of managing acute classical recreational drug/NPS toxicity was assessed using unpaired Student's t-test. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-eight (82 physicians, 106 nurses) completed the survey. Classical drug compared with NPS knowledge: nurses 2.9 ± 1.0 vs. 2.1 ± 1.0, P < 0.001; physicians 3.1 ± 0.8 vs. 2.1 ± 1.0, P < 0.001. There was no difference between nurses and physicians in classical drug (P = 0.11) or NPS (P = 0.89) knowledge. Confidence in managing classical drug toxicity compared with NPS confidence: nurses 3.0 ± 1.1 vs. 2.3 ± 1.1, P < 0.001; physicians 3.0 ± 0.9 vs. 2.1 ± 1.0, P < 0.001. There was no difference between nurses and physicians in classical drugs (P = 0.85) or NPS (P = 0.33) confidence. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians/nurses are less confident in managing acute NPS toxicity. Management of toxicity is not dependent on knowing the drug/NPS, but should be on the basis of these clinical signs/symptoms. Training/education should focus on the concept of managing the pattern of toxicity that an individual presents with rather than the actual drug(s).
BACKGROUND: The features of acute classical recreational drugs or new psychoactive substances (NPS) toxicity fall into three broad groups: (i) stimulant; (ii) hallucinogenic and (iii) depressant. Currently, there is no information available on healthcare professionals knowledge/confidence in managing the acute toxicity related to NPS use. AIM: We have compared knowledge and confidence of managing acute toxicity related to use of NPS with that seen with the use of to classical recreational drugs. DESIGN AND METHODS: Physicians/nurses completed a questionnaire survey to self-assess on a 5-point scale their knowledge (1-little knowledge; 5-very knowledgeable) and confidence (1-little confidence; 5-very confident) of managing acute toxicity related to the use of classical recreational drugs or NPS. Differences between knowledge and confidence for classical recreational drugs and NPS were assessed using paired Student's t-test; comparison between doctors, nurses and the frequency of managing acute classical recreational drug/NPS toxicity was assessed using unpaired Student's t-test. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-eight (82 physicians, 106 nurses) completed the survey. Classical drug compared with NPS knowledge: nurses 2.9 ± 1.0 vs. 2.1 ± 1.0, P < 0.001; physicians 3.1 ± 0.8 vs. 2.1 ± 1.0, P < 0.001. There was no difference between nurses and physicians in classical drug (P = 0.11) or NPS (P = 0.89) knowledge. Confidence in managing classical drug toxicity compared with NPS confidence: nurses 3.0 ± 1.1 vs. 2.3 ± 1.1, P < 0.001; physicians 3.0 ± 0.9 vs. 2.1 ± 1.0, P < 0.001. There was no difference between nurses and physicians in classical drugs (P = 0.85) or NPS (P = 0.33) confidence. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians/nurses are less confident in managing acute NPS toxicity. Management of toxicity is not dependent on knowing the drug/NPS, but should be on the basis of these clinical signs/symptoms. Training/education should focus on the concept of managing the pattern of toxicity that an individual presents with rather than the actual drug(s).
Authors: Fridtjof Heyerdahl; Knut Erik Hovda; Isabelle Giraudon; Christopher Yates; Alison M Dines; Roumen Sedefov; David M Wood; Paul I Dargan Journal: Clin Toxicol (Phila) Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 4.467
Authors: D M Wood; F Heyerdahl; C B Yates; A M Dines; I Giraudon; K E Hovda; P I Dargan Journal: Clin Toxicol (Phila) Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 4.467
Authors: Elena Deligianni; Omari J Daniel; John M Corkery; Fabrizio Schifano; Lisa A Lione Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: George Savulich; Owen Bowden-Jones; Robert Stephenson; Annette B Brühl; Karen D Ersche; Trevor W Robbins; Barbara J Sahakian Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 4.157