Literature DB >> 25658166

Prevalence of use and acute toxicity associated with the use of NBOMe drugs.

David M Wood1, Roumen Sedefov, Andrew Cunningham, Paul I Dargan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The 25X-NBOMe series are N-2-methoxybenzyl analogues of the respective 2C-X substituted phenethylamine and include 25B-N(BOMe)2, 25B-NBOMe, 25C-NBOMe, 25D-NBOMe, 25E-NBOMe, 25G-NBOMe, 25H-NBOMe, 25I-NBOMe, 25N-NBOMe and 25iP-NBOMe. There are reports of their use as novel psychoactive substances and associated acute toxicity from Europe, the United States and elsewhere over the last five years. This review will discuss the epidemiology of use and pattern of acute toxicity associated with use of these compounds.
METHODS: A PubMed search was performed using the search terms 'NBOMe', '25B-N(BOMe)2', '25B-NBOMe', '25C-NBOMe', '25D-NBOMe', '25E-NBOMe', '25G-NBOMe', '25H-NBOMe', '25I-NBOMe', '25N-NBOMe' and '25iP-NBOMe' covering the years 1966-2014. In addition, abstracts from the 2010-2014 congresses of the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists and the 2010-2013 North American Congress of Clinical Toxicology were reviewed using these search terms. Further information was obtained from the European Information System and Database on New Drugs co-ordinated by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). PREVALENCE OF USE: There are no national or international surveys collecting data on the prevalence of use of NBOMe drugs. The only information on prevalence of use is from two sub-population surveys of individuals who frequent nightclubs. Of 22,289 respondents of the 2013 Global Drugs Survey, 582 (2.6%) had previously used an NBOMe; the most commonly used NBOMe was 25I-NBOMe (442 respondents, 2.0% of whole cohort and 75.9% of those who had used an NBOMe). In a survey of 397 clubbers in London nightclubs in 2013, 11.8% had heard of the NBOMe drugs (compared with 96.0% for mephedrone), and 4.8% had ever used an NBOMe (compared with 76.6% for mephedrone). ACUTE TOXICITY: There were 29 published cases in the literature of acute toxicity associated with the use of an NBOMe: 25I-NBOMe - 23 cases; 25B-NBOMe - 3 cases; 25C-NBOMe - 3 cases. Commonly reported features include tachycardia (96.6%), hypertension (62.0%), agitation/aggression (48.2%), seizures (37.9%) and hyperthermia (27.6%). Five patients were reported to have developed acute kidney injury. There were an additional 25 reports of acute toxicity related to the use of 25I-NBOMe reported to the EMCDDA. The pattern of toxicity in these cases is similar to that seen in the published cases. NBOMe-related deaths. 25I-NBOMe has been detected in eight fatalities; in one of these, 25C-NBOMe was also detected. The role of the NBOMe drugs in these deaths has not been determined in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is evidence suggesting limited use of the NBOMe class of drugs as novel psychoactive substances compared with that of classical recreational drugs and other novel psychoactive substances such as mephedrone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute toxicity; NBOMe; Novel psychoactive substances; Recreational drugs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25658166     DOI: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1004179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-3650            Impact factor:   4.467


  10 in total

1.  Neurochemical pharmacology of psychoactive substituted N-benzylphenethylamines: High potency agonists at 5-HT2A receptors.

Authors:  Amy J Eshleman; Katherine M Wolfrum; John F Reed; Sunyoung O Kim; Robert A Johnson; Aaron Janowsky
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.858

2.  Locomotor and discriminative stimulus effects of four novel hallucinogens in rodents.

Authors:  Michael B Gatch; Sean B Dolan; Michael J Forster
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.293

3.  Recommendations for specimen collection for NBOMe analysis in clinical toxicology.

Authors:  Justin L Poklis; Carl E Wolf; Carrol R Nanco; Alphonse Poklis
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.467

4.  Healthcare professionals are less confident in managing acute toxicity related to the use of new psychoactive substances (NPS) compared with classical recreational drugs.

Authors:  D M Wood; B Ceronie; P I Dargan
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2015-11-15

5.  Neurochemical binding profiles of novel indole and benzofuran MDMA analogues.

Authors:  Jakob A Shimshoni; Ilan Winkler; Ezekiel Golan; David Nutt
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  Neuropharmacology of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS): Focus on the Rewarding and Reinforcing Properties of Cannabimimetics and Amphetamine-Like Stimulants.

Authors:  Cristina Miliano; Giovanni Serpelloni; Claudia Rimondo; Maddalena Mereu; Matteo Marti; Maria Antonietta De Luca
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  New psychoactive substances: a review and updates.

Authors:  Abu Shafi; Alex J Berry; Harry Sumnall; David M Wood; Derek K Tracy
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-12-17

8.  Effect of -NBOMe Compounds on Sensorimotor, Motor, and Prepulse Inhibition Responses in Mice in Comparison With the 2C Analogs and Lysergic Acid Diethylamide: From Preclinical Evidence to Forensic Implication in Driving Under the Influence of Drugs.

Authors:  Micaela Tirri; Sabrine Bilel; Raffaella Arfè; Giorgia Corli; Beatrice Marchetti; Tatiana Bernardi; Federica Boccuto; Giovanni Serpelloni; Francesco Botrè; Fabio De-Giorgio; Krystyna Golembiowska; Matteo Marti
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 5.435

Review 9.  Designer drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effects.

Authors:  Dino Luethi; Matthias E Liechti
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Knowledge and Use of Novel Psychoactive Substances in an Italian Sample with Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Deborah Dal Farra; Alice Valdesalici; Giancarlo Zecchinato; Alfio De Sandre; Diego Saccon; Pierluigi Simonato; Ornella Corazza; Giovanni Martinotti; Andrew L Smith; Marco Solmi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.