Literature DB >> 26571398

Mesodermal iPSC-derived progenitor cells functionally regenerate cardiac and skeletal muscle.

Mattia Quattrocelli, Melissa Swinnen, Giorgia Giacomazzi, Jordi Camps, Ines Barthélemy, Gabriele Ceccarelli, Ellen Caluwé, Hanne Grosemans, Lieven Thorrez, Gloria Pelizzo, Manja Muijtjens, Catherine M Verfaillie, Stephane Blot, Stefan Janssens, Maurilio Sampaolesi.   

Abstract

Conditions such as muscular dystrophies (MDs) that affect both cardiac and skeletal muscles would benefit from therapeutic strategies that enable regeneration of both of these striated muscle types. Protocols have been developed to promote induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to differentiate toward cardiac or skeletal muscle; however, there are currently no strategies to simultaneously target both muscle types. Tissues exhibit specific epigenetic alterations; therefore, source-related lineage biases have the potential to improve iPSC-driven multilineage differentiation. Here, we determined that differential myogenic propensity influences the commitment of isogenic iPSCs and a specifically isolated pool of mesodermal iPSC-derived progenitors (MiPs) toward the striated muscle lineages. Differential myogenic propensity did not influence pluripotency, but did selectively enhance chimerism of MiP-derived tissue in both fetal and adult skeletal muscle. When injected into dystrophic mice, MiPs engrafted and repaired both skeletal and cardiac muscle, reducing functional defects. Similarly, engraftment into dystrophic mice of canine MiPs from dystrophic dogs that had undergone TALEN-mediated correction of the MD-associated mutation also resulted in functional striatal muscle regeneration. Moreover, human MiPs exhibited the same capacity for the dual differentiation observed in murine and canine MiPs. The findings of this study suggest that MiPs should be further explored for combined therapy of cardiac and skeletal muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26571398      PMCID: PMC4665797          DOI: 10.1172/JCI82735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  39 in total

Review 1.  Fate choice of post-natal mesoderm progenitors: skeletal versus cardiac muscle plasticity.

Authors:  Domiziana Costamagna; Mattia Quattrocelli; Robin Duelen; Vardine Sahakyan; Ilaria Perini; Giacomo Palazzolo; Maurilio Sampaolesi
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Development. A stem cell perspective on cellular engineering.

Authors:  Sergei Doulatov; George Q Daley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  High levels of glucose induce "metabolic memory" in cardiomyocyte via epigenetic histone H3 lysine 9 methylation.

Authors:  Xi-Yong Yu; Yong-Jian Geng; Jia-Liang Liang; Saidan Zhang; He-Ping Lei; Shi-Long Zhong; Qiu-Xiong Lin; Zhi-Xin Shan; Shu-Guang Lin; Yangxin Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Mouse and human mesoangioblasts: isolation and characterization from adult skeletal muscles.

Authors:  Mattia Quattrocelli; Giacomo Palazzolo; Ilaria Perini; Stefania Crippa; Marco Cassano; Maurilio Sampaolesi
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

5.  An iPSC line from human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoes early to invasive stages of pancreatic cancer progression.

Authors:  Jungsun Kim; John P Hoffman; R Katherine Alpaugh; Andrew D Rhim; Andrew D Rhimm; Maximilian Reichert; Ben Z Stanger; Emma E Furth; Antonia R Sepulveda; Chao-Xing Yuan; Kyoung-Jae Won; Greg Donahue; Jessica Sands; Andrew A Gumbs; Kenneth S Zaret
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Correlation analysis of clinical parameters with epigenetic modifications in the DUX4 promoter in FSHD.

Authors:  Judit Balog; Peter E Thijssen; Jessica C de Greef; Bharati Shah; Baziel G M van Engelen; Kyoko Yokomori; Stephen J Tapscott; Rabi Tawil; Silvère M van der Maarel
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.528

7.  Highly efficient induction and long-term maintenance of multipotent cardiovascular progenitors from human pluripotent stem cells under defined conditions.

Authors:  Nan Cao; He Liang; Jijun Huang; Jia Wang; Yixiong Chen; Zhongyan Chen; Huang-Tian Yang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 25.617

8.  Mesp1 patterns mesoderm into cardiac, hematopoietic, or skeletal myogenic progenitors in a context-dependent manner.

Authors:  Sunny Sun-Kin Chan; Xiaozhong Shi; Akira Toyama; Robert W Arpke; Abhijit Dandapat; Michelina Iacovino; Jinjoo Kang; Gengyun Le; Hannah R Hagen; Daniel J Garry; Michael Kyba
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 24.633

9.  Donor cell type can influence the epigenome and differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Kitai Kim; Rui Zhao; Akiko Doi; Kitwa Ng; Juli Unternaehrer; Patrick Cahan; Hongguang Huo; Yuin-Han Loh; Martin J Aryee; M William Lensch; Hu Li; James J Collins; Andrew P Feinberg; George Q Daley
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Epigenetic regulation of myogenic gene expression by heterochromatin protein 1 alpha.

Authors:  Patima Sdek; Kyohei Oyama; Ekaterini Angelis; Shing S Chan; Katja Schenke-Layland; W Robb MacLellan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Pluripotent stem cell-based therapy for Parkinson's disease: Current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Kai-C Sonntag; Bin Song; Nayeon Lee; Jin Hyuk Jung; Young Cha; Pierre Leblanc; Carolyn Neff; Sek Won Kong; Bob S Carter; Jeffrey Schweitzer; Kwang-Soo Kim
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  In vivo myomaker-mediated heterologous fusion and nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Mitani; Ronald J Vagnozzi; Douglas P Millay
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Human dental pulp pluripotent-like stem cells promote wound healing and muscle regeneration.

Authors:  Ester Martínez-Sarrà; Sheyla Montori; Carlos Gil-Recio; Raquel Núñez-Toldrà; Domiziana Costamagna; Alessio Rotini; Maher Atari; Aernout Luttun; Maurilio Sampaolesi
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 6.832

4.  BMP and WNT: the road to cardiomyocytes is paved with precise modulation.

Authors:  Mattia Quattrocelli; Elizabeth M McNally
Journal:  Stem Cell Investig       Date:  2016-06-15

Review 5.  Striated muscle function, regeneration, and repair.

Authors:  I Y Shadrin; A Khodabukus; N Bursac
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 6.  Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Therapeutics for Muscular Dystrophies.

Authors:  Sridhar Selvaraj; Michael Kyba; Rita C R Perlingeiro
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 11.951

7.  A Cell-Autonomous Signature of Dysregulated Protein Phosphorylation Underlies Muscle Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Thiago M Batista; Ashok Kumar Jayavelu; Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen; Salvatore Iovino; Jasmin Lebastchi; Hui Pan; Jonathan M Dreyfuss; Anna Krook; Juleen R Zierath; Matthias Mann; C Ronald Kahn
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 27.287

8.  Intermittent Glucocorticoid Dosing Improves Muscle Repair and Function in Mice with Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Mattia Quattrocelli; Isabella M Salamone; Patrick G Page; James L Warner; Alexis R Demonbreun; Elizabeth M McNally
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 9.  Heart Regeneration in Adult Mammals after Myocardial Damage.

Authors:  Baiping Cui; Yufan Zheng; Lihua Sun; Ting Shi; Ziyu Shi; Lijue Wang; Guoying Huang; Ning Sun
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 10.  Capturing Human Naïve Pluripotency in the Embryo and in the Dish.

Authors:  Ludovic Zimmerlin; Tea Soon Park; Elias T Zambidis
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.