| Literature DB >> 26571123 |
Ryan Anderson1, A Murat Maga1,2,3.
Abstract
High-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been the primary modality for obtaining 3D cross-sectional anatomical information in animals for soft tissue, particularly brain. However, costs associated with MRI can be considerably high for large phenotypic screens for gross differences in the structure of the brain due to pathology and/or experimental manipulations. MicroCT (mCT), especially benchtop mCT, is becoming a common laboratory equipment with throughput rates equal or faster than any form of high-resolution MRI at lower costs. Here we explore adapting previously developed contrast based mCT to image adult mouse brains in-situ. We show that 2% weight per volume (w/v) iodine-potassium iodide solution can be successfully used to image adult mouse brains within 48 hours post-mortem when a structural support matrix is used. We demonstrate that hydrogel can be effectively used as a perfusant which limits the tissue shrinkage due to iodine.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26571123 PMCID: PMC4646620 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1A. A representative high-resolution MRI scan of an age matched C57BL/6J displaying the brain and the mCT overlay (yellow outline) from [21]. B. Equivalent cross sections from five females that constitute the Group A (Hg perfusion) after 48h of staining in 2% I2KI. C. One individual that constitutes Group B (PFA perfusion) after 48h of staining in 2% I2KI. D-F: Heatmaps showing the difference in the obtained segmentations with respect to the reference MRI atlas constructed from [21,22]. To remove volumetric differences due to sex and age, we isometrically scaled our segmented brains to match the volume of the reference MRI atlas. Root mean square (RMS) errors are calculated after the scaling. D: Comparison of our Group A mCT atlas. RMS = 0.128.mm. E: Comparison of individuals of Group A. RMS values are 0.172mm, 0.143mm, 0.156mm, 0.142mm, 0.196mm respectively. F: Comparison of Group B. RMS = 0.232 mm. All comparisons are rendered on MRI reference atlas. Grey areas in the heat map indicate regions of large difference (>0.5mm) either due to extreme shrinkage or difference in segmentation.