Literature DB >> 26568670

A Comparison of the Accuracy of Linear Measurements Obtained from Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Images and Digital Models.

Ben Creed1, Chung How Kau1, Jeryl D English1, James J Xia1, Robert P Lee1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether cone beam digital models are as accurate as OrthoCAD (Cadent, Inc, Carlstadt, NJ) digital models for the purposes of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Digital records of 30 subjects were retrospectively reviewed, and the digital models were obtained as OrthoCAD and InVivoDental (San Jose, CA) digital models. Seven parameters indicating linear measurements from predetermined landmarks were measured and analyzed. The analysis of variance and Bland and Altman Analysis were used to compare and evaluate measurements made from the study models generated from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and InVivoDental software. The mean difference between the maxillary InVivoDental models and the maxillary OrthoCAD models ranged from -0.57 to 0.44 mm. The analysis of variance for repeated measures (P < 0.001) was applied to all data obtained from the CBCT and OrthoCAD models. The results indicated a mean score of 35.12 and 35.12 mm, respectively. The mean difference of all values was -7.93 × 10-3 mm. The range of these values at the 95% confidence interval was -0.14 and 0.12 mm for the lower and upper limits, respectively. The results were not statistically significant for both groups. The Bland and Altman analysis was also applied to the data. In the maxilla, the results indicated that the mean difference between InVivoDental and OrthoCAD was -0.01 ± 1.24 mm. The range of the analysis indicated a spread of -2.40 mm and +2.40 mm. In the mandible, the results indicated that the mean difference between InVivoDental and OrthoCAD was -0.01 ± 1.21 mm. The range of the analysis indicated a spread of -2.36 mm and +2.37 mm. The results showed that the linear measurements obtained from CBCT image casts indicated a good level of accuracy when compared with OrthoCAD models. The accuracy was considered adequate for initial diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 26568670      PMCID: PMC4642285          DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2010.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Orthod        ISSN: 1073-8746            Impact factor:   0.970


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models.

Authors:  A Bell; A F Ayoub; P Siebert
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2003-09

2.  The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models.

Authors:  Meredith L Quimby; Katherine W L Vig; Robert G Rashid; Allen R Firestone
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  OrthoCAD: digital models for a digital era.

Authors:  L Joffe
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2004-12

4.  Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models.

Authors:  Matthew Mayers; Allen R Firestone; Robert Rashid; Katherine W L Vig
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics.

Authors:  C H Kau; S Richmond; J M Palomo; M G Hans
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2005-12

6.  Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records.

Authors:  U K Han; K W Vig; J A Weintraub; P S Vig; C J Kowalski
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  The evolution of digital study models.

Authors:  James Mah
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2007-09

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

Authors:  Brian Rheude; P Lionel Sadowsky; Andre Ferriera; Alex Jacobson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.079

  9 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use.

Authors:  S D Kapila; J M Nervina
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Accuracy and reproducibility of dental measurements on tomographic digital models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jamille B Ferreira; Ilana O Christovam; David S Alencar; Andréa F J da Motta; Claudia T Mattos; Adriana Cury-Saramago
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics.

Authors:  İpek Coşkun; Burçak Kaya
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-06

4.  Comparison of the dimensional and morphological accuracy of three-dimensional digital dental casts digitized using different methods.

Authors:  Jiahui Ye; Shimin Wang; Zixuan Wang; Yunsong Liu; Yuchun Sun; Hongqiang Ye; Yongsheng Zhou
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.885

5.  Modeling and Simulating an Orthodontic System Using Virtual Methods.

Authors:  Stelian-Mihai-Sever Petrescu; Mihaela Jana Țuculină; Dragoș Laurențiu Popa; Alina Duță; Alex Ioan Sălan; Ruxandra Voinea Georgescu; Oana Andreea Diaconu; Adina Andreea Turcu; Horia Mocanu; Andreea Gabriela Nicola; Ionela Teodora Dascălu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23

6.  Transverse effect of Haas and Hyrax appliances on the upper dental arch in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: a comparative study.

Authors:  Anna Júlia de Oliveira Façanha; Tulio Silva Lara; Daniela Gamba Garib; Omar Gabriel da Silva Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

7.  A comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanners using an intraoral environment simulator.

Authors:  Hye-Nan Park; Young-Jun Lim; Won-Jin Yi; Jung-Suk Han; Seung-Pyo Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique.

Authors:  Jae-Hong Kim; Ki-Baek Kim; Woong-Chul Kim; Ji-Hwan Kim; Hae-Young Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Reliability of CBCT in the diagnosis of dental asymmetry.

Authors:  Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Leonardo Koerich; Carolina Baratieri; Claudia Trindade Mattos; Matheus Alves; Daniel Brunetto; Lindsey Eidson
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

10.  Evaluation of dental morphometrics during the orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Magdaléna Kašparová; Aleš Procházka; Lucie Grajciarová; Mohammadreza Yadollahi; Oldřich Vyšata; Tat'jana Dostálová
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.