Literature DB >> 26568155

Association analysis of insulin-like growth factor-1 axis parameters with survival and functional status in nonagenarians of the Leiden Longevity Study.

Evie van der Spoel1, Maarten P Rozing1,2, Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat3, P Eline Slagboom2,4, Marian Beekman2,4, Anton J M de Craen1,2, Rudi G J Westendorp1,2,5, Diana van Heemst1,2.   

Abstract

Reduced insulin/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) signaling has been associated with longevity in various model organisms. However, the role of insulin/IGF-1 signaling in human survival remains controversial. The aim of this study was to test whether circulating IGF-1 axis parameters associate with old age survival and functional status in nonagenarians from the Leiden Longevity Study. This study examined 858 Dutch nonagenarian (males≥89 years; females≥91 years) siblings from 409 families, without selection on health or demographic characteristics. Nonagenarians were divided over sex-specific strata according to their levels of IGF-1, IGF binding protein 3 and IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio. We found that lower IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratios were associated with improved survival: nonagenarians in the quartile of the lowest ratio had a lower estimated hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.73 (0.59 - 0.91) compared to the quartile with the highest ratio (ptrend=0.002). Functional status was assessed by (Instrumental) Activities of Daily Living ((I)ADL) scales. Compared to those in the quartile with the highest IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratio, nonagenarians in the lowest quartile had higher scores for ADL (ptrend=0.001) and IADL (ptrend=0.003). These findings suggest that IGF-1 axis parameters are associated with increased old age survival and better functional status in nonagenarians from the Leiden Longevity Study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IGF-1 axis; familial longevity; functional status; human; survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26568155      PMCID: PMC4694065          DOI: 10.18632/aging.100841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)        ISSN: 1945-4589            Impact factor:   5.682


INTRODUCTION

The role of the evolutionarily conserved insulin/insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) signaling (IIS) pathway in the regulation of lifespan is well documented in worms [1], flies [2], and rodents [3,4]. Genetic mutations that inhibit IIS activation prolong lifespan in these organisms, particularly in the female sex. The involvement of IIS modulation in human longevity is less clear [5]. In agreement with the findings in model organisms, reduced IIS pathway activity was associated with old age survival in sporadic female octogenarians and different cohorts of nonagenarians [6,7] as well as with better cognitive function [8]. Furthermore, centenarians were shown to be enriched for rare IGF-1R mutations associated with IGF-1 resistance [9]. As in mice, mutations causing growth hormone (GH) resistance resulting in low circulating levels of IGF-1 have been reported to confer protection against the development of cancer and diabetes in men [10]. Circulatory IGF-1 is mostly bound to any of six high affinity IGF binding proteins, of which IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) is the most abundant. The IGFBP3 glycoprotein forms a complex with IGF-1 and an acid-labile component and serves as a reservoir of IGF-1 in the circulation. IGF-1 is only biologically active in its free form, which accounts for approximately 1% of total IGF-1. Therefore the IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio is considered a better indicator of IGF-1 bioavailability than total IGF-1. [11,12] Both IGF-1 and IGBP3 are under control of GH [13]. With age, levels of GH decline as do the levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP3 [14]. In contrast to the apparent beneficial effects associated with constitutively low GH/IGF-1 activity discussed above, lower serum IGF-1 levels in humans have also been associated with an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease and diabetes [15]. In order to identify heritable determinants of longevity we set up the Leiden Longevity Study. This study includes nonagenarian siblings, recruited from 421 Caucasian families based on proband siblings that both exhibit exceptional longevity [16] and their offspring [17]. Using pathway analysis, a significant difference was detected between nonagenarians from the Leiden Longevity Study and a younger age group for the joint effect of genetic variation in the insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway [18]. In seeming contrast, earlier we reported on the lack of differences in serum levels of IGF-1 axis parameters between middle-aged offspring of familial nonagenarians and controls [19]. However as not all offspring will inherit the favorable genetic predisposition for longevity of their long-lived parent it is unclear to what extent serum levels of IGF-1 axis parameters in middle-aged offspring are reflective of a constitutional phenotype predisposing to longevity. Therefore, in the current study we aim to examine whether circulating levels of IGF-1, IGFBP3 and IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio are associated with old age survival and functional status in nonagenarian siblings from the Leiden Longevity Study.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

The baseline features of the study population (n=858) are displayed stratified for women (n=528) and men (n=330) in Table 1. The median age of women (93.6 years) was higher than that of men (91.4 years). Women and men also showed significant differences in circulating levels of IGFBP3 and the IGF-1/IGFPB3 molar ratio as well as in scores for cognition, functional status and circulating levels of free triiodothyronine (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study population

WomenMenP-value
Participants (N)528330
Age (years)93.6 (92.2 – 95.3)91.4 (90.1 – 93.7)<0.001
Family mortality history score parents−1.4 (−2.8 – −0.2)−1.3 (−2.5 – −0.2)0.94
IGF-1 (nmol/L)10.1 (7.7 – 13.0)10.1 (7.6 – 13.2)0.98
IGFBP3 (mg/L)*3.2 (0.9)2.7 (0.8)<0.001
IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio*0.09 (0.08 – 0.11)0.11 (0.10 – 0.13)<0.001
Disability (points)
 Mini-Mental State Examination25 (21 - 28)26 (24 – 28)0.03
 Activities of Daily Living (ADL)#17 (13 – 19)19 (17 – 20)<0.001
 Instrumental ADL#7 (3 – 11)10 (6 – 12)<0.001
Non-fasted glucose6.1 (5.3 - 7.2)6.1 (5.4 – 7.1)0.81
Non-fasted insulin21.0 (11.3 – 36.0)23.0 (12.0 – 37.0)0.39
Free triiodothyronine (pmol/L)4.0 (0.7)4.1 (0.7)0.04
High sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L)2.7 (1.3 – 5.4)3.0 (1.4 – 6.6)0.31

Unless specified otherwise, data are presented as median with interquartile ranges and analyzed with a non-parametric Median Test.

data are presented as mean with standard deviation and analyzed with linear regression.

data available for 527 women and 329 men;

data available for 467 women and 308 men;

data available for 488 women and 307 men;

data available for 527 women and 327 men;

data available for 528 women and 329 men

Unless specified otherwise, data are presented as median with interquartile ranges and analyzed with a non-parametric Median Test. data are presented as mean with standard deviation and analyzed with linear regression. data available for 527 women and 329 men; data available for 467 women and 308 men; data available for 488 women and 307 men; data available for 527 women and 327 men; data available for 528 women and 329 men

Association of IGF-1 axis parameters and survival

Nonagenarian siblings were divided over four sex-specific strata according to their circulating levels of IGF-1, IGFBP3 or their IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio. In Table 2, we assessed the relation between quartiles of serum IGF-1 axis parameters and survival, using a left truncated Cox proportional hazards model to correct for the delayed entry into the risk set according to age. Table 2 shows that lower IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratios were associated with significantly lower hazard ratios (p for trend = 0.002). There was no interaction between sex-specific quartiles of IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratios and sex (p = 0.57). We found a proportional hazard ratio of 0.73 for nonagenarians in the quartile with the lowest IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratio, which is indicative of a 27% higher chance of survival compared to nonagenarians in the quartile with the highest IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratio. Moreover, observed effects did not change during the course of follow-up (data not shown).
Table 2

Estimated hazard ratios for sex-specific quartiles of serum IGF-1 axis parameters

Median (range) womenMedian (range) menHazard ratioP-value
IGF-1 (nmol/L)
 Q16.3 (3.1 – 7.6)6.5 (3.6 – 7.5)0.89 (0.72 – 1.11)0.30
 Q28.7 (7.7 – 10.0)9.0 (7.6 – 10.0)0.81 (0.65 – 1.00)0.05
 Q311.4 (10.1 – 12.9)11.4 (10.1 – 13.0)0.94 (0.77 – 1.14)0.52
 Q415.8 (13.0 – 31.3)15.3 (13.2 – 30.5)1 (ref)
P for trend0.15
IGFBP3 (mg/L)
 Q12.2 (0.8 – 2.5)1.8 (1.0 – 2.0)1.11 (0.90 – 1.37)0.35
 Q22.8 (2.6 – 3.0)2.3 (2.1 – 2.5)1.04 (0.85 – 1.26)0.72
 Q33.3 (3.1 – 3.6)2.8 (2.6 – 3.0)0.99 (0.81 – 1.20)0.89
 Q44.2 (3.7 – 6.7)3.5 (3.1 – 10.1)1 (ref)
P for trend0.31
IGF-1/IGFBP3molar ratio
 Q10.07 (0.05 – 0.08)0.09 (0.02 – 0.10)0.73 (0.59 – 0.91)0.005
 Q20.09 (0.08 – 0.09)0.11 (0.10 – 0.11)0.74 (0.59 – 0.92)0.007
 Q30.10 (0.09 – 0.11)0.12 (0.11 – 0.13)0.87 (0.72 – 1.06)0.16
 Q40.13 (0.11 – 0.21)0.15 (0.13 – 0.29)1 (ref)
P for trend0.002

Data are presented as estimated hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals per sex-specific quartiles (Q) of IGF-1, IGFBP3 or IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio as compared to highest quartile, analyzed with cox regression adjusted for family relationship.

Data are presented as estimated hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals per sex-specific quartiles (Q) of IGF-1, IGFBP3 or IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio as compared to highest quartile, analyzed with cox regression adjusted for family relationship.

Association of IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio and functional status

Next we assessed the relation between quartiles of serum IGF-1 axis parameters and available baseline measures of functional status and health. Table 3 shows that lower IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratios in nonagenarians were associated with less physical disability. Compared to nonagenarians in the quartile with the highest IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratios, those in the quartile of the lowest IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratios had higher mean (95% CI) scores for both Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (16.8 (16.3 – 17.4) vs 15.2 (14.5 – 15.9), p for trend = 0.001) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) (8.0 (7.4 – 8.7) vs 6.9 (6.3 – 7.5), p for trend = 0.003). The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) did not significantly differ across quartiles. Interestingly, lower IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratios were associated with lower levels of non-fasted insulin.
Table 3

Baseline characteristics for quartiles of IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio

Q1Q2Q3Q4P for trend
Demographics
 Participants (N)213213215215
 Men (N, %)82 (38.5)82 (38.5)83 (38.6)82 (38.1)0.95
 Age (years)93.5 (93.1 – 93.8)93.3 (93.0 – 93.7)93.4 (93.0 – 93.7)93.1 (92.8 – 93.5)0.27
Disability (points)
 Mini-Mental State Examination24.4 (23.7 – 25.2)24.5 (23.7 – 25.2)24.5 (23.8 – 25.1)23.6 (22.8 – 24.4)0.11
 Activities of Daily Living (ADL)#16.8 (16.3 – 17.4)16.4 (15.7 – 17.1)16.2 (15.6 – 16.8)15.2 (14.5 – 15.9)0.001
 Instrumental ADL#8.0 (7.4 – 8.7)8.2 (7.6 – 8.8)7.6 (7.0 – 8.1)6.9 (6.3 – 7.5)0.003
Serum parameters
 Non-fasted glucose6.2 (5.9 – 6.4)6.4 (6.2 – 6.6)6.4 (6.2 – 6.6)6.4 (6.2 – 6.7)0.10
 Non-fasted insulin16.3 (14.4 – 18.5)20.7 (18.5 – 23.2)20.9 (18.7 – 23.5)23.3 (20.9 – 25.9)<0.001
 Free triiodothyronine (pmol/L)4.0 (3.9 – 4.1)4.1 (4.0 – 4.2)4.1 (4.0 – 4.2)4.1 (4.0 – 4.2)0.23
 High sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L)2.7 (2.3 – 3.2)3.2 (2.7 – 3.8)2.6 (2.2 – 3.1)3.1 (2.6 – 3.7)0.64
Family mortality history score
Family mortality history score parents−1.7 (−1.9 – −1.4)−1.8 (−2.1 – −1.6)−1.5 (−1.8 – −1.3)−1.5 (−1.8 – −1.3)0.22

Unless specified otherwise, data are presented as mean with 95% confidence interval, analyzed with linear regression adjusted for age and family relationship except for the variables sex, age and family mortality history score parents).

data available for 774 participants (197 in Q1, 193 in Q2, 189 in Q3, 195 in Q4);

data available for 793 participants (192 in Q1, 196 in Q2, 200 in Q3, 205 in Q4);

data available for 852 participants (212 in Q1, 212 in Q2, 213 in Q4);

data available for 855 participants (212 in Q1)

Unless specified otherwise, data are presented as mean with 95% confidence interval, analyzed with linear regression adjusted for age and family relationship except for the variables sex, age and family mortality history score parents). data available for 774 participants (197 in Q1, 193 in Q2, 189 in Q3, 195 in Q4); data available for 793 participants (192 in Q1, 196 in Q2, 200 in Q3, 205 in Q4); data available for 852 participants (212 in Q1, 212 in Q2, 213 in Q4); data available for 855 participants (212 in Q1)

Family mortality history score

Previously, we had calculated a family mortality history score describing the mortality of the parents of the nonagenarian siblings [20]. To assess whether a lower IGF-1/IGBP3 molar ratio is a feature of familial longevity, we compared the family mortality history score across quartiles of IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio. Table 3 shows that lower IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratios in nonagenarians siblings were not associated with a lower family mortality history score (i.e. lower than expected mortality of the parents of the nonagenarian siblings).

DISCUSSION

This study aimed to explore the association of circulating IGF-1 axis serum parameters with survival and functional status in nonagenarian siblings from the Leiden Longevity Study. First we demonstrated that lower IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratios conferred a survival benefit at the age of ninety years or older. Secondly, lower IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratios were associated with better functional status at the age of ninety years or older. Our outcomes support the recent observation that low IGF-1 levels predict survival in exceptionally long-lived humans [21]. Not only do we confirm that lower IGF-1 axis serum parameters are related with survival in the oldest old, but we also demonstrate that lower IGF-1 axis serum parameters are associated with better functional status. A large number of studies have reported an association between reduced IIS activity and longevity in various model organisms as well as in human studies showing life extending effects of reduced IGF-1 signaling [1-4,7]. In these studies lifespan extending effects were mostly confined to females, unlike the results presented here. In contrast with our findings, Paolisso et al. observed higher serum IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratios in healthy centenarians when compared to aged controls [22]. Another study showed a higher prevalence of heterozygous mutations in the IGF-1R in Ashkenazi Jewish centenarians compared to controls with concomitant higher serum IGF-1 levels [9]. Moreover they found a sex-specific increase in serum IGF-1 associated with a smaller stature in female offspring of centenarians, suggesting the involvement of reduced IGF-1R activity in human longevity [9]. Unfortunately, anthropometric data were not available in our current study. Therefore we cannot draw firm conclusions as to how the IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratios correlate with the underlying IGF-1 signaling activity in our study population. It has been suggested that low levels of IGF-1 and/or reduced IGF-1 bioavailability form part of a survival response that can be constitutively active in long-lived individuals as well as elicited by diverse forms of stress, including metabolic stress, genotoxic stress and inflammation [23]. In hospitalized elderly patients, frailty, impairments and mortality were associated with a distinct biomarker signature that comprised higher levels of inflammatory markers and lower levels of growth factors and anabolic hormones, including IGF-1 and free triiodothyronine [24]. In our study, levels of CRP and free triiodothyronine did not differ across quartiles of the IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratios, while functional status was better in the quartile with the lowest IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratio, in line with the observed survival benefit. A limitation of our study is that information about medical history, medication use and specific causes of death is lacking. Previous research suggested that enhancement of insulin sensitivity was a key mediator of the increased longevity of hypopituitary, GH- resistant, and calorie-restricted animals [25]. Moreover, preserved insulin sensitivity was also shown to be a key phenotype of human longevity, both at middle age [26] and at extremely high ages [27]. Previously, we observed lower fasted levels of glucose and insulin when the offspring of the included nonagenarians were compared to an age-matched control group [28]. It is a limitation of the current study that all blood parameters, including IGF-1, IGFBP3, glucose and insulin were determined in non-fasted samples collected at a random moment of the day and that data on insulin sensitivity and food intake were lacking. Circulatory levels of IGF-1 will decrease while levels of its binding proteins (notably IGFBP1) will increase in response to reductions in food intake, in particular the intake of protein [29]. Nevertheless, our finding that lower IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratios were associated with relatively lower circulating levels of insulin is suggestive of better insulin sensitivity and in accordance with other recent human data [30]. IGF-1 has structural and functional homology with insulin, and it has been suggested that insulin resistance might lead to increased IGF-1 bioavailability to compensate for reduced insulin action. Another limitation of our study is its cross sectional design which precludes causal inference of the observed associations. Because we found that lower IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratios were associated with better old age survival in nonagenarians of the LLS, we assessed whether nonagenarian IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratios were associated with a family mortality history score describing the mortality of the parents of the nonagenarian siblings. Our findings on lack of association between nonagenarian IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratios and family mortality history score are in accordance with the lack of difference in IGF-1 axis parameters, including IGF-1, IGFBP3 and the IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratios previously observed between middle-aged offspring of familial nonagenarians and controls. These disparate results suggest that the possible benefits of low IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratios may differ according to age and birth cohorts. One of the possible explanations is that with advancing age, the IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratio changes and that those individuals that adapt to a lower IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratio have a survival advantage in old age. Another possibility is selective survival of participants with constitutively lower IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratios. It is possible that selective advantage of variation in the IIS pathway may only become detectable at advanced ages. In line, the association between FOXO3A and longevity was for example found to be stronger in centenarians than in nonagenarians [31]. In our study, a considerable percentage of included nonagenarians (23.8%) also reached an age of 100 years or more. Amongst others, another possible explanation for these contrasting observations could be differences in imprinting of IGF-1 axis genes, reflecting historical differences in maternal nutrition between generations [32]. In conclusion, we showed that in nonagenarian siblings IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratios are associated with better survival and functional status. These preliminary findings support the involvement of IGF-1 signaling in modulating human longevity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the Leiden Longevity Study, 421 families were recruited consisting of long-lived Caucasian siblings together with their offspring and the partners thereof. For the current study, data on IGF-1 and IGFBP3 levels were available for 858 of the 944 nonagenarian participants from the Leiden Longevity Study. After a median follow-up time of 3.4 years (range 0 – 11.5 years), 797 individuals (92.9%) had died. The Medical Ethical Committee of the Leiden University Medical Center approved the study and informed consent was obtained from all subjects. For details on enrollment please see previous publications [17,19]. All serum measurements were performed with fully automated equipment. For IGF-1, IGFBP3, and insulin the Modular E170 was used, for glucose, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and free triiodothyronine the Cobas Integra 800 was used, both from Roche, Almere, the Netherlands. The coefficients of variation of these measurements were all below 5%. Global cognitive function was assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and functional status was assessed by Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scales as described previously [33]. ADL disability scores range from 0 points (fully dependent in all activities) to 20 points (fully independent in all activities). IADL disability scores range from 0 points (fully dependent in all activities) to 14 points (fully independent in all activities). MMSE scores range from zero points (very severe cognitive impairment) to 30 points (optimal cognitive function). For each parent we computed the sex and birth cohort cumulative hazards using the life tables of the Dutch population. Note that since both parents are deceased one minus the cumulative hazard equals the martingale residual. The martingale residual is defined as the difference between the event status (0 if alive, 1 if deceased) and the cumulative hazard at the observed age (current age or age at death). The sum of the martingale residuals measures the deviation of survival of the parents with respect to their birth cohort. Therefore negative values indicate excess survival and positive values indicate excess mortality. Nonagenarians were divided over four sex-specific strata according to their circulating levels of IGF-1, IGFBP3 or their IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio. The association between quartiles of IGF-1 axis parameters and baseline characteristics of nonagenarians was assessed using a linear mixed model corrected for correlation of sibling data using robust standard errors clustered on family number. Distributions of continuous variables were examined for normality and logarithmically transformed when appropriate. Survival analyses were performed with a left truncated Cox proportional hazards model to correct for the delayed entry into the risk set according to age and the model was corrected for correlation of sibling data using robust standard errors clustered on family number. The Statistical Package STATA (“statistics and data”) for Windows, version 12.0 SE, and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, version 20.0, were used for data analysis.
  33 in total

Review 1.  Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I and its binding proteins in health and disease.

Authors:  Anders Juul
Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.372

2.  Weighted statistics for aggregation and linkage analysis of human longevity in selected families: the Leiden Longevity Study.

Authors:  J J Houwing-Duistermaat; A Callegaro; M Beekman; R G Westendorp; P E Slagboom; J C van Houwelingen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Reduced insulin/IGF-1 signalling and human longevity.

Authors:  Diana van Heemst; Marian Beekman; Simon P Mooijaart; Bastiaan T Heijmans; Bernd W Brandt; Bas J Zwaan; P Eline Slagboom; Rudi G J Westendorp
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.304

4.  Serum concentrations of free and total insulin-like growth factor-I, IGF binding proteins -1 and -3 and IGFBP-3 protease activity in boys with normal or precocious puberty.

Authors:  A Juul; A Flyvbjerg; J Frystyk; J Müller; N E Skakkebaek
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.478

5.  Identification of a metabolic signature for multidimensional impairment and mortality risk in hospitalized older patients.

Authors:  Luigi Fontana; Filomena Addante; Massimiliano Copetti; Giulia Paroni; Andrea Fontana; Daniele Sancarlo; Fabio Pellegrini; Luigi Ferrucci; Alberto Pilotto
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 9.304

6.  Imprint switch mutations at Rasgrf1 support conflict hypothesis of imprinting and define a growth control mechanism upstream of IGF1.

Authors:  Nadia M Drake; Yoon Jung Park; Aditya S Shirali; Thomas A Cleland; Paul D Soloway
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 7.  Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), IGF binding proteins, their biologic interactions, and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Manjinder S Sandhu; David B Dunger; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Insulin/Insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling and cognitive function in humans.

Authors:  Sjoerd M Euser; Diana van Heemst; Peter van Vliet; Monique M B Breteler; Rudi G J Westendorp
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Association of FOXO3A variation with human longevity confirmed in German centenarians.

Authors:  Friederike Flachsbart; Amke Caliebe; Rabea Kleindorp; Hélène Blanché; Huberta von Eller-Eberstein; Susanna Nikolaus; Stefan Schreiber; Almut Nebel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Insulin sensitivity as a key mediator of growth hormone actions on longevity.

Authors:  Michal M Masternak; Jacob A Panici; Michael S Bonkowski; Larry F Hughes; Andrzej Bartke
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 6.053

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  The Somatotropic Axis in Human Aging: Framework for the Current State of Knowledge and Future Research.

Authors:  Sofiya Milman; Derek M Huffman; Nir Barzilai
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 27.287

Review 2.  Mitochondrial function and nutrient sensing pathways in ageing: enhancing longevity through dietary interventions.

Authors:  Elangbam Tomtheelnganbee; Puja Sah; R Sharma
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.284

Review 3.  Physiological Systems in Promoting Frailty.

Authors:  Laís R Perazza; Holly M Brown-Borg; LaDora V Thompson
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 8.915

4.  Growth Hormone, Not IGF-1 Is the Key Longevity Regulator in Mammals.

Authors:  Holly M Brown-Borg
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 6.591

5.  The association between peripheral total IGF-1, IGFBP-3, and IGF-1/IGFBP-3 and functional and cognitive outcomes in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.

Authors:  Alexandra M V Wennberg; Clinton E Hagen; Mary M Machulda; John H Hollman; Rosebud O Roberts; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Michelle M Mielke
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  Lower circulating insulin-like growth factor-I is associated with better cognition in females with exceptional longevity without compromise to muscle mass and function.

Authors:  Leland Perice; Nir Barzilai; Joe Verghese; Erica F Weiss; Roee Holtzer; Pinchas Cohen; Sofiya Milman
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 7.  Developmental Drift and the Role of Wnt Signaling in Aging.

Authors:  Jan Gruber; Zhuangli Yee; Nicholas S Tolwinski
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  The GH receptor exon 3 deletion is a marker of male-specific exceptional longevity associated with increased GH sensitivity and taller stature.

Authors:  Danny Ben-Avraham; Diddahally R Govindaraju; Temuri Budagov; Delphine Fradin; Peter Durda; Bing Liu; Sandy Ott; Danielle Gutman; Lital Sharvit; Robert Kaplan; Pierre Bougnères; Alex Reiner; Alan R Shuldiner; Pinchas Cohen; Nir Barzilai; Gil Atzmon
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Assessment of the contribution of APOE gene variants to metabolic phenotypes associated with familial longevity at middle age.

Authors:  Raymond Noordam; Charlotte H Oudt; Joris Deelen; P Eline Slagboom; Marian Beekman; Diana van Heemst
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.682

10.  Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 and IGF Binding Proteins Predict All-Cause Mortality and Morbidity in Older Adults.

Authors:  William B Zhang; Sandra Aleksic; Tina Gao; Erica F Weiss; Eleni Demetriou; Joe Verghese; Roee Holtzer; Nir Barzilai; Sofiya Milman
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.666

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.