| Literature DB >> 26568155 |
Evie van der Spoel1, Maarten P Rozing1,2, Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat3, P Eline Slagboom2,4, Marian Beekman2,4, Anton J M de Craen1,2, Rudi G J Westendorp1,2,5, Diana van Heemst1,2.
Abstract
Reduced insulin/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) signaling has been associated with longevity in various model organisms. However, the role of insulin/IGF-1 signaling in human survival remains controversial. The aim of this study was to test whether circulating IGF-1 axis parameters associate with old age survival and functional status in nonagenarians from the Leiden Longevity Study. This study examined 858 Dutch nonagenarian (males≥89 years; females≥91 years) siblings from 409 families, without selection on health or demographic characteristics. Nonagenarians were divided over sex-specific strata according to their levels of IGF-1, IGF binding protein 3 and IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio. We found that lower IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratios were associated with improved survival: nonagenarians in the quartile of the lowest ratio had a lower estimated hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.73 (0.59 - 0.91) compared to the quartile with the highest ratio (ptrend=0.002). Functional status was assessed by (Instrumental) Activities of Daily Living ((I)ADL) scales. Compared to those in the quartile with the highest IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratio, nonagenarians in the lowest quartile had higher scores for ADL (ptrend=0.001) and IADL (ptrend=0.003). These findings suggest that IGF-1 axis parameters are associated with increased old age survival and better functional status in nonagenarians from the Leiden Longevity Study.Entities:
Keywords: IGF-1 axis; familial longevity; functional status; human; survival
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26568155 PMCID: PMC4694065 DOI: 10.18632/aging.100841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Baseline characteristics of the study population
| Women | Men | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants (N) | 528 | 330 | |
| Age (years) | 93.6 (92.2 – 95.3) | 91.4 (90.1 – 93.7) | |
| Family mortality history score parents | −1.4 (−2.8 – −0.2) | −1.3 (−2.5 – −0.2) | 0.94 |
| IGF-1 (nmol/L) | 10.1 (7.7 – 13.0) | 10.1 (7.6 – 13.2) | 0.98 |
| IGFBP3 (mg/L) | 3.2 (0.9) | 2.7 (0.8) | |
| IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio | 0.09 (0.08 – 0.11) | 0.11 (0.10 – 0.13) | |
| Disability (points) | |||
| Mini-Mental State Examination | 25 (21 - 28) | 26 (24 – 28) | |
| Activities of Daily Living (ADL) | 17 (13 – 19) | 19 (17 – 20) | |
| Instrumental ADL | 7 (3 – 11) | 10 (6 – 12) | |
| Non-fasted glucose | 6.1 (5.3 - 7.2) | 6.1 (5.4 – 7.1) | 0.81 |
| Non-fasted insulin | 21.0 (11.3 – 36.0) | 23.0 (12.0 – 37.0) | 0.39 |
| Free triiodothyronine (pmol/L) | 4.0 (0.7) | 4.1 (0.7) | |
| High sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 2.7 (1.3 – 5.4) | 3.0 (1.4 – 6.6) | 0.31 |
Unless specified otherwise, data are presented as median with interquartile ranges and analyzed with a non-parametric Median Test.
data are presented as mean with standard deviation and analyzed with linear regression.
data available for 527 women and 329 men;
data available for 467 women and 308 men;
data available for 488 women and 307 men;
data available for 527 women and 327 men;
data available for 528 women and 329 men
Estimated hazard ratios for sex-specific quartiles of serum IGF-1 axis parameters
| Median (range) women | Median (range) men | Hazard ratio | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGF-1 (nmol/L) | ||||
| Q1 | 6.3 (3.1 – 7.6) | 6.5 (3.6 – 7.5) | 0.89 (0.72 – 1.11) | 0.30 |
| Q2 | 8.7 (7.7 – 10.0) | 9.0 (7.6 – 10.0) | 0.81 (0.65 – 1.00) | |
| Q3 | 11.4 (10.1 – 12.9) | 11.4 (10.1 – 13.0) | 0.94 (0.77 – 1.14) | 0.52 |
| Q4 | 15.8 (13.0 – 31.3) | 15.3 (13.2 – 30.5) | 1 (ref) | |
| P for trend | 0.15 | |||
| IGFBP3 (mg/L) | ||||
| Q1 | 2.2 (0.8 – 2.5) | 1.8 (1.0 – 2.0) | 1.11 (0.90 – 1.37) | 0.35 |
| Q2 | 2.8 (2.6 – 3.0) | 2.3 (2.1 – 2.5) | 1.04 (0.85 – 1.26) | 0.72 |
| Q3 | 3.3 (3.1 – 3.6) | 2.8 (2.6 – 3.0) | 0.99 (0.81 – 1.20) | 0.89 |
| Q4 | 4.2 (3.7 – 6.7) | 3.5 (3.1 – 10.1) | 1 (ref) | |
| P for trend | 0.31 | |||
| IGF-1/IGFBP3molar ratio | ||||
| Q1 | 0.07 (0.05 – 0.08) | 0.09 (0.02 – 0.10) | 0.73 (0.59 – 0.91) | |
| Q2 | 0.09 (0.08 – 0.09) | 0.11 (0.10 – 0.11) | 0.74 (0.59 – 0.92) | |
| Q3 | 0.10 (0.09 – 0.11) | 0.12 (0.11 – 0.13) | 0.87 (0.72 – 1.06) | 0.16 |
| Q4 | 0.13 (0.11 – 0.21) | 0.15 (0.13 – 0.29) | 1 (ref) | |
| P for trend | ||||
Data are presented as estimated hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals per sex-specific quartiles (Q) of IGF-1, IGFBP3 or IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio as compared to highest quartile, analyzed with cox regression adjusted for family relationship.
Baseline characteristics for quartiles of IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | P for trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants (N) | 213 | 213 | 215 | 215 | ||||||
| Men (N, %) | 82 (38.5) | 82 (38.5) | 83 (38.6) | 82 (38.1) | 0.95 | |||||
| Age (years) | 93.5 (93.1 – 93.8) | 93.3 (93.0 – 93.7) | 93.4 (93.0 – 93.7) | 93.1 (92.8 – 93.5) | 0.27 | |||||
| Mini-Mental State Examination | 24.4 (23.7 – 25.2) | 24.5 (23.7 – 25.2) | 24.5 (23.8 – 25.1) | 23.6 (22.8 – 24.4) | 0.11 | |||||
| Activities of Daily Living (ADL) | 16.8 (16.3 – 17.4) | 16.4 (15.7 – 17.1) | 16.2 (15.6 – 16.8) | 15.2 (14.5 – 15.9) | ||||||
| Instrumental ADL | 8.0 (7.4 – 8.7) | 8.2 (7.6 – 8.8) | 7.6 (7.0 – 8.1) | 6.9 (6.3 – 7.5) | ||||||
| Non-fasted glucose | 6.2 (5.9 – 6.4) | 6.4 (6.2 – 6.6) | 6.4 (6.2 – 6.6) | 6.4 (6.2 – 6.7) | 0.10 | |||||
| Non-fasted insulin | 16.3 (14.4 – 18.5) | 20.7 (18.5 – 23.2) | 20.9 (18.7 – 23.5) | 23.3 (20.9 – 25.9) | ||||||
| Free triiodothyronine (pmol/L) | 4.0 (3.9 – 4.1) | 4.1 (4.0 – 4.2) | 4.1 (4.0 – 4.2) | 4.1 (4.0 – 4.2) | 0.23 | |||||
| High sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 2.7 (2.3 – 3.2) | 3.2 (2.7 – 3.8) | 2.6 (2.2 – 3.1) | 3.1 (2.6 – 3.7) | 0.64 | |||||
| Family mortality history score parents | −1.7 (−1.9 – −1.4) | −1.8 (−2.1 – −1.6) | −1.5 (−1.8 – −1.3) | −1.5 (−1.8 – −1.3) | 0.22 | |||||
Unless specified otherwise, data are presented as mean with 95% confidence interval, analyzed with linear regression adjusted for age and family relationship except for the variables sex, age and family mortality history score parents).
data available for 774 participants (197 in Q1, 193 in Q2, 189 in Q3, 195 in Q4);
data available for 793 participants (192 in Q1, 196 in Q2, 200 in Q3, 205 in Q4);
data available for 852 participants (212 in Q1, 212 in Q2, 213 in Q4);
data available for 855 participants (212 in Q1)