Literature DB >> 26567236

Pipeline embolization device thrombosis induced peri-construct collateral channels.

Albert Ho Yuen Chiu1, Thomas R Marotta2.   

Abstract

More than half a decade of experience and follow-up has now been accumulated with regard to flow diversion as a treatment for intracranial aneurysms; however, many uncertainties, such as the nature of aneurysmal remnants and the meaning of non-regressed, non-perfused aneurysmal masses, are still unknown. Here we discuss a 22-year-old man who presented with a grade 1 subarachnoid hemorrhage secondary to a dissecting right anterior cerebral artery aneurysm who was subsequently treated with a Pipeline Embolization Device construct. After ceasing dual antiplatelet therapy himself, he was found on MRI to have an area of increased aneurysmal remnant reperfusion. This was found to connect to multiple channels which reconstituted flow within the distal construct on angiography. The central area of construct thrombosis could not be visualized on MRI. The finding suggests that non-opacified aneurysmal remnants that have not regressed are biologically active and raises concerns regarding using MRI for long term follow-up. 2015 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysm; Angiography; Blood Flow; Flow Diverter; MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26567236      PMCID: PMC4654201          DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2015-012093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Case Rep        ISSN: 1757-790X


  7 in total

1.  Vasa vasorum: another cause of the carotid string sign.

Authors:  M A Martin; T R Marotta
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment.

Authors:  Z Kulcsár; E Houdart; A Bonafé; G Parker; J Millar; A J P Goddard; S Renowden; G Gál; B Turowski; K Mitchell; F Gray; M Rodriguez; R van den Berg; A Gruber; H Desal; I Wanke; D A Rüfenacht
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Long-Term Follow-Up Results following Elective Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device.

Authors:  A H Y Chiu; A K Cheung; J D Wenderoth; L De Villiers; H Rice; C C Phatouros; T P Singh; T J Phillips; W McAuliffe
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results.

Authors:  I Saatci; K Yavuz; C Ozer; S Geyik; H S Cekirge
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Long-term follow-up after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: results from a single center.

Authors:  H A Deutschmann; M Wehrschuetz; M Augustin; K Niederkorn; G E Klein
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Timothy Hampton; Donal Walsh; Christos Tolias; David Fiorella
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 5.836

7.  Evolution of Flow-Diverter Endothelialization and Thrombus Organization in Giant Fusiform Aneurysms after Flow Diversion: A Histopathologic Study.

Authors:  I Szikora; E Turányi; M Marosfoi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.