Literature DB >> 26566318

A national questionnaire survey on knee manipulation following total knee arthroplasty.

Shen Hwa Vun1, David William Shields1, Aroop Sen1, Sajan Shareef1, Satyajit Sinha1, Alexander Craig Campbell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adequate range of knee motion is critical for successful total knee arthroplasty. While aggressive physical therapy is an important component, manipulation may be a necessary supplement. There seems to be a lack of consensus with variable practices existing in managing stiff postoperative knees following arthroplasty. Hence we aim to determine the current practice and trend among knee surgeons throughout the United Kingdom.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Postal questionnaires were sent out to 100 knee surgeons registered with British Association of Knee Surgeons, ensuring that the whole of United Kingdom was well represented. The questions included whether the surgeon used Manipulation Under Anaesthaesia (MUA) as an option for stiff postoperative knees; timing of MUA; use of Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) post-manipulation.
RESULTS: We received 82 responses. 46% of respondents performed MUA routinely, 43% sometimes, and 11 never. Majority (71.23%) performed MUA within 3 months of the index procedure. 68% routinely used CPM post-manipulation while 7% of the respondents applied splints or serial cast post MUA. 41% of the surgeons routinely used Patient Controlled Analgaesia ± Regional blocks. Majority (55%) never performed open/arthroscopic debridement of fibrous tissue for adhesiolysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Knee manipulation requires an additional anaesthetic and may result in complications such as: supracondylar femur fractures, wound dehiscence, patellar tendon avulsions, haemarthrosis, and heterotopic ossification. Moreover studies have shown that manipulation while being an important therapeutic adjunct does not increase the ultimate flexion achieved. Manipulation should be reserved for the patient with difficult and painful flexion in the early postoperative period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthrolysis; Manipulation; Stiff; Total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2015        PMID: 26566318      PMCID: PMC4601990          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2015.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  16 in total

1.  Results at 11.5 years of a series of 376 posterior stabilized HLS1 total knee replacements. Survivorship analysis, and risk factors for failure.

Authors:  O Tayot; T Aït Si Selmi; P Neyret
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Management of knee pain and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P E Scranton
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  [Influence of the height of the joint space on the three-dimensional kinetics of total knee prostheses and behavior of the lateral ligaments: an in vitro study].

Authors:  F Châtain; F Marin; F Lavaste; W Skalli; P Neyret
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2002-12

4.  Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision.

Authors:  Jane Kim; Charles L Nelson; Paul A Lotke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Manipulation after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Michael Keating; Merrill A Ritter; Leesa D Harty; Gail Haas; John B Meding; Philip M Faris; Michael E Berend
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living.

Authors:  K N Laubenthal; G L Smidt; D B Kettelkamp
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1972-01

7.  The role of manipulation following total knee replacement.

Authors:  J L Fox; R Poss
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Revision of the stiff total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian P Christensen; John J Crawford; Matthew D Olin; Thomas Parker Vail
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 9.  Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew R Bong; Paul E Di Cesare
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  The stiff knee: evaluation and management.

Authors:  John M Cuckler
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  4 in total

1.  Manipulation under anesthesia: to do or not to do, that is the question.

Authors:  Annette W-Dahl
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.925

2.  Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty: patients with keloids at risk.

Authors:  Travis R Flick; Cindy X Wang; Akshar H Patel; Thomas W Hodo; William F Sherman; Fernando L Sanchez
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-01-05

3.  Postoperative pain as a risk factor for stiff knee following total knee arthroplasty and excellent patientreported outcomes after manipulation under anesthesia.

Authors:  Mikko T Rantasalo; Riku A Palanne; Sukhdev Saini; Anne P Vakkuri; Rami Madanat; Skants K Noora
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Flexion contracture due to cyclops lesion after bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Benjamin A Winston; Jackson Jones; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-10-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.