Literature DB >> 12066268

Revision of the stiff total knee arthroplasty.

Christian P Christensen1, John J Crawford, Matthew D Olin, Thomas Parker Vail.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the improvement in range of motion after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a consecutive series of patients with TKAs presenting with pain and limited range of motion. Eleven stiff (range of motion <70 degrees ) and painful TKAs were revised with a posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis and reviewed after an average of 37.6 months (range, 24-53 months). The average range of motion increased from 39.7 degrees preoperatively to 83.2 degrees postoperatively. The mean flexion contracture decreased from 13.2 degrees to 0.9 degrees. Pain scores improved from 4.5 to 44.1, and all 11 patients were satisfied. This study shows that knee range of motion can improve significantly after revision TKA. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12066268     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.32105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  23 in total

1.  Autologous platelet gel and fibrin sealant enhance the efficacy of total knee arthroplasty: improved range of motion, decreased length of stay and a reduced incidence of arthrofibrosis.

Authors:  Peter A M Everts; Roger J J Devilee; Cornelis J M Oosterbos; Christine Brown Mahoney; Maarten Eeftinck Schattenkerk; Johannes T A Knape; André van Zundert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Etiology and surgical interventions for stiff total knee replacements.

Authors:  Alejandro González Della Valle; Alejandro Leali; Steven Haas
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-09

3.  Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Bédard; Kelly G Vince; John Redfern; Stacy R Collen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Predisposing factors which are relevant for the clinical outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francois Hardeman; Jürgen Londers; Alexander Favril; Erik Witvrouw; Johan Bellemans; Jan Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Predictors of range of motion in patients undergoing manipulation after TKA.

Authors:  Harpreet S Bawa; Glenn D Wera; Matthew J Kraay; Randall E Marcus; Victor M Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Moderate clinical improvement after revision arthroplasty of the severely stiff knee.

Authors:  P J C Heesterbeek; J H M Goosen; J J P Schimmel; K C Defoort; G G van Hellemondt; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Manipulation under anaesthesia for stiffness following knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Riazuddin Mohammed; Shakir Syed; Naveed Ahmed
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Painful knee arthroplasty: current practice.

Authors:  Umberto Cottino; Federica Rosso; Antonio Pastrone; Federico Dettoni; Roberto Rossi; Matteo Bruzzone
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

9.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability of two-dimensional CT scan for total knee arthroplasty component malrotation.

Authors:  Beau Konigsberg; Ryan Hess; Curtis Hartman; Lynette Smith; Kevin L Garvin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Stiffness in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Simone Cerciello; Michele Vasso; Mario Tartarone
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.