Literature DB >> 26566203

The feasibility of producing patient-specific acrylic cranioplasty implants with a low-cost 3D printer.

Eddie T W Tan1, Ji Min Ling1, Shree Kumar Dinesh1.   

Abstract

OBJECT Commercially available, preformed patient-specific cranioplasty implants are anatomically accurate but costly. Acrylic bone cement is a commonly used alternative. However, the manual shaping of the bone cement is difficult and may not lead to a satisfactory implant in some cases. The object of this study was to determine the feasibility of fabricating molds using a commercial low-cost 3D printer for the purpose of producing patient-specific acrylic cranioplasty implants. METHODS Using data from a high-resolution brain CT scan of a patient with a calvarial defect posthemicraniectomy, a skull phantom and a mold were generated with computer software and fabricated with the 3D printer using the fused deposition modeling method. The mold was used as a template to shape the acrylic implant, which was formed via a polymerization reaction. The resulting implant was fitted to the skull phantom and the cranial index of symmetry was determined. RESULTS The skull phantom and mold were successfully fabricated with the 3D printer. The application of acrylic bone cement to the mold was simple and straightforward. The resulting implant did not require further adjustment or drilling prior to being fitted to the skull phantom. The cranial index of symmetry was 96.2% (the cranial index of symmetry is 100% for a perfectly symmetrical skull). CONCLUSIONS This study showed that it is feasible to produce patient-specific acrylic cranioplasty implants with a low-cost 3D printer. Further studies are required to determine applicability in the clinical setting. This promising technique has the potential to bring personalized medicine to more patients around the world.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; PEEK = polyetheretherketone; acrylic bone cement; additive manufacturing; cranioplasty; mold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26566203     DOI: 10.3171/2015.5.JNS15119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  16 in total

Review 1.  Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Recent Developments.

Authors:  Gordon M Paul; Amin Rezaienia; Pihua Wen; Sridhar Condoor; Nadeem Parkar; Wilson King; Theodosios Korakianitis
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

2.  On-Demand Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Printing of Custom Cranioplastic Prostheses.

Authors:  Alexander I Evins; John Dutton; Sayem S Imam; Amal O Dadi; Tao Xu; Du Cheng; Philip E Stieg; Antonio Bernardo
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.703

3.  Assessment of a Novel Computer Algorithm for Printing a 3-Dimensional Nasal Prosthetic.

Authors:  Meryam Shikara; Christopher J Rizzi; Brian Zelip; Fleesie Hubbard; Kavita T Vakharia; Amal Isaiah; Jewel D Greywoode; Kalpesh T Vakharia
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 4.  Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications.

Authors:  Kacper Kroczek; Paweł Turek; Damian Mazur; Jacek Szczygielski; Damian Filip; Robert Brodowski; Krzysztof Balawender; Łukasz Przeszłowski; Bogumił Lewandowski; Stanisław Orkisz; Artur Mazur; Grzegorz Budzik; Józef Cebulski; Mariusz Oleksy
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 5.  State-of-Art of Standard and Innovative Materials Used in Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Valentina Siracusa; Giuseppe Maimone; Vincenzo Antonelli
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  Customized alloplastic cranioplasty of large bone defects by 3D-printed prefabricated mold template after posttraumatic decompressive craniectomy: A technical note.

Authors:  Bruno Splavski; Goran Lakicevic; Marko Kovacevic; Damir Godec
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-04-22

Review 7.  3D printing in neurosurgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Randazzo; Jared M Pisapia; Nickpreet Singh; Jayesh P Thawani
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-11-14

8.  A retrospective descriptive study of cranioplasty failure rates and contributing factors in novel 3D printed calcium phosphate implants compared to traditional materials.

Authors:  Michael Koller; Daniel Rafter; Gillian Shok; Sean Murphy; Sheena Kiaei; Uzma Samadani
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2020-06-17

9.  Current Applications and Future Perspectives of the Use of 3D Printing in Anatomical Training and Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Vivek Baskaran; Goran Štrkalj; Mirjana Štrkalj; Antonio Di Ieva
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.856

10.  Studies on the cytocompatibility, mechanical and antimicrobial properties of 3D printed poly(methyl methacrylate) beads.

Authors:  David K Mills; Uday Jammalamadaka; Karthik Tappa; Jeffery Weisman
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2018-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.