Literature DB >> 29800960

Assessment of a Novel Computer Algorithm for Printing a 3-Dimensional Nasal Prosthetic.

Meryam Shikara1, Christopher J Rizzi2, Brian Zelip3, Fleesie Hubbard1, Kavita T Vakharia4, Amal Isaiah1, Jewel D Greywoode1,5, Kalpesh T Vakharia1,5.   

Abstract

Importance: The introduction and evaluation of a novel technique to create nasal prostheses with 3-dimensional (3-D) imaging software may circumvent the need for an anaplastologist.
Objectives: To describe a novel computer algorithm for the creation of a 3-D model of a nose and to evaluate the similarity of appearance of the nasal prosthesis with that of the individual's nose. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective pilot study with a cross-sectional survey was conducted from August 1 to October 31, 2016, at a tertiary care academic center. Five volunteers were used for creation of the nasal prostheses, and 36 survey respondents with a medical background were involved in evaluating the nasal prostheses. Exposures: A computer algorithm using a 3-D animation software (Blender; Blender Foundation) and Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems) were used to create a 3-D model of a nose. Photographs of 5 volunteers were processed with the computer algorithm. The model was then printed using a desktop 3-D printer. Attending physicians, residents, and medical students completed a survey and were asked to rate the similarity between the individuals' photographs and their 3-D printed nose on a Likert-type scale. Main Outcomes and Measures: The similarity between 3-D printed nasal models and photographs of the volunteers' noses based on survey data.
Results: Thirty-six survey respondents evaluated 4 views for each of the 5 modeled noses (from 4 women and 1 man; mean [SD] age, 26.6 [5.7] years). The mean (SD) score for the overall similarity between the photographs and the 3-D models was 8.42 (1.34). The mean scores for each nasal comparison ranged from 7.97 to 8.62. According to the survey, respondents were able to match the correct 3-D nose to the corresponding volunteers' photographs in 171 of 175 photographs (97.7%). All surveyed clinicians indicated that they would consider using this tool to create a temporary prosthesis instead of referring to a prosthodontist. Conclusions and Relevance: This algorithm can be used to model and print a 3-D prosthesis of a human nose. The printed models closely depicted the photographs of each volunteer's nose and can potentially be used to create a temporary prosthesis to fill external nasal defects. The appropriate clinical application of this technique is yet to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29800960      PMCID: PMC6145789          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  16 in total

1.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 2.  A decade of experience with injectable poly-L-lactic acid: a focus on safety.

Authors:  Cynthia Bartus; C William Hanke; Elizabeth Daro-Kaftan
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.398

3.  Three-dimensional printing in cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Daniel Schmauss; Sandra Haeberle; Christian Hagl; Ralf Sodian
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  3D-printed haptic "reverse" models for preoperative planning in soft tissue reconstruction: a case report.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; Frank Lin; Robert T Spychal; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 2.425

5.  3D Bioprinting Human Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose-Alginate Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Kajsa Markstedt; Athanasios Mantas; Ivan Tournier; Héctor Martínez Ávila; Daniel Hägg; Paul Gatenholm
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 6.988

6.  Reconstruction of nasal defects larger than 1.5 centimeters in diameter.

Authors:  S S Park
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  3D face reconstruction from 2D pictures: first results of a web-based computer aided system for aesthetic procedures.

Authors:  Thiago Oliveira-Santos; Christian Baumberger; Mihai Constantinescu; Radu Olariu; Lutz-Peter Nolte; Salman Alaraibi; Mauricio Reyes
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 8.  Use of resorbable implants for mandibular fixation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shailesh Agarwal; Anish Gupta; Mark Grevious; Russell R Reid
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Personalized development of human organs using 3D printing technology.

Authors:  Dina Radenkovic; Atefeh Solouk; Alexander Seifalian
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.538

10.  Fabrication of low cost soft tissue prostheses with the desktop 3D printer.

Authors:  Yong He; Guang-huai Xue; Jian-zhong Fu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Custom-made artificial eyes using 3D printing for dogs: A preliminary study.

Authors:  So-Young Park; Jeong-Hee An; Hyun Kwon; Seo-Young Choi; Ka-Young Lim; Ho-Hyun Kwak; Kamal Hany Hussein; Heung-Myong Woo; Kyung-Mee Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.