Literature DB >> 26565746

Specific Binding of Tetratricopeptide Repeat Proteins to Heat Shock Protein 70 (Hsp70) and Heat Shock Protein 90 (Hsp90) Is Regulated by Affinity and Phosphorylation.

Victoria A Assimon1, Daniel R Southworth1, Jason E Gestwicki2.   

Abstract

Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) require the help of tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain-containing cochaperones for many of their functions. Each monomer of Hsp70 or Hsp90 can interact with only a single TPR cochaperone at a time, and each member of the TPR cochaperone family brings distinct functions to the complex. Thus, competition for TPR binding sites on Hsp70 and Hsp90 appears to shape chaperone activity. Recent structural and biophysical efforts have improved our understanding of chaperone-TPR contacts, focusing on the C-terminal EEVD motif that is present in both chaperones. To better understand these important protein-protein interactions on a wider scale, we measured the affinity of five TPR cochaperones, CHIP, Hop, DnaJC7, FKBP51, and FKBP52, for the C-termini of four members of the chaperone family, Hsc70, Hsp72, Hsp90α, and Hsp90β, in vitro. These studies identified some surprising selectivity among the chaperone-TPR pairs, including the selective binding of FKBP51/52 to Hsp90α/β. These results also revealed that other TPR cochaperones are only able to weakly discriminate between the chaperones or between their paralogs. We also explored whether mimicking phosphorylation of serine and threonine residues near the EEVD motif might impact affinity and found that pseudophosphorylation had selective effects on binding to CHIP but not other cochaperones. Together, these findings suggest that both intrinsic affinity and post-translational modifications tune the interactions between the Hsp70 and Hsp90 proteins and the TPR cochaperones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26565746      PMCID: PMC4714923          DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  68 in total

1.  Hsp90 as an anti-cancer target.

Authors:  Len Neckers; Edward Mimnaugh; Theodor W. Schulte
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 18.500

Review 2.  From the cradle to the grave: molecular chaperones that may choose between folding and degradation.

Authors:  J Höhfeld; D M Cyr; C Patterson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  Fine-tuning multiprotein complexes using small molecules.

Authors:  Andrea D Thompson; Amanda Dugan; Jason E Gestwicki; Anna K Mapp
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  Heme-dependent activation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase by cytosol is due to an Hsp70-dependent, thioredoxin-mediated thiol-disulfide interchange in the heme/substrate binding cleft.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Morishima; Miranda Lau; Hwei-Ming Peng; Yoshinari Miyata; Jason E Gestwicki; William B Pratt; Yoichi Osawa
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Designed TPR modules as novel anticancer agents.

Authors:  Aitziber L Cortajarena; Fang Yi; Lynne Regan
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 5.100

6.  Isoform-selective Genetic Inhibition of Constitutive Cytosolic Hsp70 Activity Promotes Client Tau Degradation Using an Altered Co-chaperone Complement.

Authors:  Sarah N Fontaine; Jennifer N Rauch; Bryce A Nordhues; Victoria A Assimon; Andrew R Stothert; Umesh K Jinwal; Jonathan J Sabbagh; Lyra Chang; Stanley M Stevens; Erik R P Zuiderweg; Jason E Gestwicki; Chad A Dickey
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  C-terminal phosphorylation of Hsp70 and Hsp90 regulates alternate binding to co-chaperones CHIP and HOP to determine cellular protein folding/degradation balances.

Authors:  P Muller; E Ruckova; P Halada; P J Coates; R Hrstka; D P Lane; B Vojtesek
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Designed proteins to modulate cellular networks.

Authors:  Aitziber L Cortajarena; Tina Y Liu; Mark Hochstrasser; Lynne Regan
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.100

9.  Ligand discrimination by TPR domains. Relevance and selectivity of EEVD-recognition in Hsp70 x Hop x Hsp90 complexes.

Authors:  Achim Brinker; Clemens Scheufler; Florian Von Der Mulbe; Burkhard Fleckenstein; Christian Herrmann; Gunther Jung; Ismail Moarefi; F Ulrich Hartl
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-03-04       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Identification of small molecules that modify the protein folding activity of heat shock protein 70.

Authors:  Susanne Wisén; Jason E Gestwicki
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 3.365

View more
  48 in total

1.  Most mutations that cause spinocerebellar ataxia autosomal recessive type 16 (SCAR16) destabilize the protein quality-control E3 ligase CHIP.

Authors:  Adam J Kanack; Oliver J Newsom; Kenneth Matthew Scaglione
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Exploration of Benzothiazole Rhodacyanines as Allosteric Inhibitors of Protein-Protein Interactions with Heat Shock Protein 70 (Hsp70).

Authors:  Hao Shao; Xiaokai Li; Michael A Moses; Luke A Gilbert; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Zapporah T Young; Margarita Chernova; Sara N Journey; Jonathan S Weissman; Byron Hann; Matthew P Jacobson; Len Neckers; Jason E Gestwicki
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Specificity for latent C termini links the E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP to caspases.

Authors:  Matthew Ravalin; Panagiotis Theofilas; Koli Basu; Kwadwo A Opoku-Nsiah; Victoria A Assimon; Daniel Medina-Cleghorn; Yi-Fan Chen; Markus F Bohn; Michelle Arkin; Lea T Grinberg; Charles S Craik; Jason E Gestwicki
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 15.040

4.  On the role, ecology, phylogeny, and structure of dual-family immunophilins.

Authors:  Sailen Barik
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 5.  Inhibitors and chemical probes for molecular chaperone networks.

Authors:  Jason E Gestwicki; Hao Shao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Peptidyl-Proline Isomerases (PPIases): Targets for Natural Products and Natural Product-Inspired Compounds.

Authors:  Bryan M Dunyak; Jason E Gestwicki
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Structural and mechanistic basis of the EMC-dependent biogenesis of distinct transmembrane clients.

Authors:  Lakshmi E Miller-Vedam; Bastian Bräuning; Katerina D Popova; Nicole T Schirle Oakdale; Jessica L Bonnar; Jesuraj R Prabu; Elizabeth A Boydston; Natalia Sevillano; Matthew J Shurtleff; Robert M Stroud; Charles S Craik; Brenda A Schulman; Adam Frost; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Non-canonical Interactions between Heat Shock Cognate Protein 70 (Hsc70) and Bcl2-associated Anthanogene (BAG) Co-Chaperones Are Important for Client Release.

Authors:  Jennifer N Rauch; Erik R P Zuiderweg; Jason E Gestwicki
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  TPR-containing proteins control protein organization and homeostasis for the endoplasmic reticulum.

Authors:  Jill B Graham; Nathan P Canniff; Daniel N Hebert
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 10.  Alterations in the E3 ligases Parkin and CHIP result in unique metabolic signaling defects and mitochondrial quality control issues.

Authors:  Britney N Lizama; Amy M Palubinsky; BethAnn McLaughlin
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.