Literature DB >> 26565598

Comparison of sEMG processing methods during whole-body vibration exercise.

Karin Lienhard1, Aline Cabasson2, Olivier Meste2, Serge S Colson3.   

Abstract

The objective was to investigate the influence of surface electromyography (sEMG) processing methods on the quantification of muscle activity during whole-body vibration (WBV) exercises. sEMG activity was recorded while the participants performed squats on the platform with and without WBV. The spikes observed in the sEMG spectrum at the vibration frequency and its harmonics were deleted using state-of-the-art methods, i.e. (1) a band-stop filter, (2) a band-pass filter, and (3) spectral linear interpolation. The same filtering methods were applied on the sEMG during the no-vibration trial. The linear interpolation method showed the highest intraclass correlation coefficients (no vibration: 0.999, WBV: 0.757-0.979) with the comparison measure (unfiltered sEMG during the no-vibration trial), followed by the band-stop filter (no vibration: 0.929-0.975, WBV: 0.661-0.938). While both methods introduced a systematic bias (P < 0.001), the error increased with increasing mean values to a higher degree for the band-stop filter. After adjusting the sEMG(RMS) during WBV for the bias, the performance of the interpolation method and the band-stop filter was comparable. The band-pass filter was in poor agreement with the other methods (ICC: 0.207-0.697), unless the sEMG(RMS) was corrected for the bias (ICC ⩾ 0.931, %LOA ⩽ 32.3). In conclusion, spectral linear interpolation or a band-stop filter centered at the vibration frequency and its multiple harmonics should be applied to delete the artifacts in the sEMG signals during WBV. With the use of a band-stop filter it is recommended to correct the sEMG(RMS) for the bias as this procedure improved its performance.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Band-stop filter; Motion artifacts; Power spectral density; Spectral linear interpolation; Surface electromyography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26565598     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  6 in total

1.  Effects of Whole Body Vibration on the Neuromuscular Amplitude of Vastus Lateralis Muscle.

Authors:  Daniel T Borges; Liane B Macedo; Caio A A Lins; Catarina O Sousa; Jamilson S Brasileiro
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Acute and chronic neuromuscular adaptations to local vibration training.

Authors:  Robin Souron; Thibault Besson; Guillaume Y Millet; Thomas Lapole
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effect of Multi-Frequency Whole-Body Vibration on Muscle Activation, Metabolic Cost and Regional Tissue Oxygenation.

Authors:  Himanshu Saxena; Kevin R Ward; Chandramouli Krishnan; Bogdan I Epureanu
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Reliability of pelvic floor muscle surface electromyography (sEMG) recordings during synchronous whole body vibration.

Authors:  Daria Chmielewska; Grzegorz Sobota; Paweł Dolibog; Patrycja Dolibog; Agnieszka Opala-Berdzik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Is 20 Hz Whole-Body Vibration Training Better for Older Individuals than 40 Hz?

Authors:  Shiuan-Yu Tseng; Chung-Po Ko; Chin-Yen Tseng; Wei-Ching Huang; Chung-Liang Lai; Chun-Hou Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Characterisation of the transient mechanical response and the electromyographical activation of lower leg muscles in whole body vibration training.

Authors:  Isotta Rigoni; Tecla Bonci; Paolo Bifulco; Antonio Fratini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.