Literature DB >> 26565018

Constructing quasi-linear V̇O2 responses from nonlinear parameters.

Samuel L Wilcox1, Ryan M Broxterman2, Thomas J Barstow3.   

Abstract

Oxygen uptake (V̇O2) kinetics have been shown to be governed by a nonlinear control system across a range of work rates. However, the linearity of the V̇O2 response to ramp incremental exercise would appear to be the result of a linear control system. This apparent contradiction could represent a balancing of changing V̇O2 kinetics parameter values across a range of work rates. To test this, six healthy men completed bouts of ramp incremental exercise at 15, 30, and 60 W/min (15R, 30R, 60R, respectively) and four bouts of an extended-step incremental exercise. V̇O2 parameter values were derived from the step exercise using two monoexponential models: one starting at time zero and encompassing the entire stage (MONO), and the other truncated to the first 5 min and allowing a time delay (5TD). The resulting parameter values were applied to an integrative model to estimate the ramp responses. As work rate increased, gain values increased (P < 0.001 for MONO and 5TD), as did mean response time (or time constant) values (MONO: P < 0.001; 5TD: P = 0.003). Up to maximal V̇O2 (V̇O(2 max)), the gains of the estimated ramp responses from both models were not different from the gains of the actual observed V̇O2 responses for 15R and 30R (15R: 11.3 ± 1.2, 11.7 ± 0.7, 10.9 ± 0.3; 30R: 10.5 ± 0.8, 11.0 ± 0.5, 10.7 ± 0.3 ml O2·min(-1)·W(-1), for actual, MONO, 5TD, respectively) but were significantly greater for 60R (8.7 ± 1.0, 9.9 ± 0.4, 10.3 ± 0.3 ml O2·min(-1)·W(-1) for actual, MONO, 5TD, respectively). Up to 80%V̇O(2 max) gain values were not significantly different for any ramp rate (P > 0.05 for all). We conclude that the apparent linearity of the V̇O2 response to ramp incremental exercise is consequent to a balancing of increasing time constant and gain parameter values.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  V̇o2 kinetics; linear ramp

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26565018     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00507.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  7 in total

1.  Influence of muscle metabolic heterogeneity in determining the V̇o2p kinetic response to ramp-incremental exercise.

Authors:  Daniel A Keir; Alan P Benson; Lorenzo K Love; Taylor C Robertson; Harry B Rossiter; John M Kowalchuk
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-12-17

2.  Interlimb differences in parameters of aerobic function and local profiles of deoxygenation during double-leg and counterweighted single-leg cycling.

Authors:  Danilo Iannetta; Louis Passfield; Ahmad Qahtani; Martin J MacInnis; Juan M Murias
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Establishing the V̇o2 versus constant-work-rate relationship from ramp-incremental exercise: simple strategies for an unsolved problem.

Authors:  Danilo Iannetta; Rafael de Almeida Azevedo; Daniel A Keir; Juan M Murias
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-10-03

4.  Safety proposals for freediving time limits should consider the metabolic-rate dependence of oxygen stores depletion.

Authors:  Charlotte Sadler; Kaighley Brett; Aaron Heerboth; Austin R Swisher; Nader Mehregani; Ross Touriel; Daniel T Cannon
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 0.887

5.  The constant work rate critical power protocol overestimates ramp incremental exercise performance.

Authors:  Matthew I Black; Andrew M Jones; James A Kelly; Stephen J Bailey; Anni Vanhatalo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Effect of intensive prior exercise on muscle fiber activation, oxygen uptake kinetics, and oxygen uptake plateau occurrence.

Authors:  Max Niemeyer; Renate Leithäuser; Ralph Beneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Remote ischemic preconditioning enhances aerobic performance by accelerating regional oxygenation and improving cardiac function during acute hypobaric hypoxia exposure.

Authors:  Zhifeng Zhong; Huaping Dong; Yu Wu; Simin Zhou; Hong Li; Pei Huang; Huaijun Tian; Xiaoxu Li; Heng Xiao; Tian Yang; Kun Xiong; Gang Zhang; Zhongwei Tang; Yaling Li; Xueying Fan; Chao Yuan; Jiaolin Ning; Yue Li; Jiaxin Xie; Peng Li
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.755

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.