Maria Pia Villa1, Anna Sujanska2, Ottavio Vitelli3, Melania Evangelisti3, Jole Rabasco3, Nicoletta Pietropaoli3, Peter Banovcin2, Leila Kheirandish-Gozal4, David Gozal4. 1. Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sense Organs Department, Pediatric Sleep Disease Centre, S. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. mariapia.villa@uniroma1.it. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia. 3. Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sense Organs Department, Pediatric Sleep Disease Centre, S. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 4. Section of Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Comer Children's Hospital, Pritzker School of Medicine, Biological Sciences Division, The University of Chicago, 5721 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of the sleep clinical record (SCR) in the follow-up of children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) after treatment. METHODS: SCR was completed and overnight polysomnography (PSG) was performed in all enrolled children (T0), with SCR considered positive for scores ≥6.5, as previously validated. Patients underwent adenotonsillectomy (T&A), rapid maxillary expansion (RME), and medical therapy according to severity of OSA and clinical features. Six months after completing therapy, the second overnight PSG and SCR (T1) were performed. RESULTS: For all subjects, both Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and total SCR score decreased significantly (<0.005) from T0 to T1. For SCR items, clinical examination (item 1) and reported sleep respiratory symptoms (item 2) ameliorated significantly (<0.005). However, hyperactivity or inattention (item 3) decreased significantly (<0.005) after treatment only in T&A group, while no differences in AHI and SCR scores occurred in the medically treated group. At T1, SCR was positive in 95.6 % of children with AHI ≥1, with a concordance of 100 % in the T&A and RME groups, resulting in a positive predictive value of 100 %. A poor concordance (38.3 % in T&A group and 53.4 % in RME group) was found when SCR < 6.5. Children with SCR ≥ 6.5 at T1 showed higher AHI compared to patients with SCR < 6.5 (5.7 ± 5.9 ev/h vs 1.78 ± 1.76 ev/h; p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: SCR emerges as a potentially useful instrument for follow-up of children with OSA after treatment.
PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of the sleep clinical record (SCR) in the follow-up of children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) after treatment. METHODS: SCR was completed and overnight polysomnography (PSG) was performed in all enrolled children (T0), with SCR considered positive for scores ≥6.5, as previously validated. Patients underwent adenotonsillectomy (T&A), rapid maxillary expansion (RME), and medical therapy according to severity of OSA and clinical features. Six months after completing therapy, the second overnight PSG and SCR (T1) were performed. RESULTS: For all subjects, both Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and total SCR score decreased significantly (<0.005) from T0 to T1. For SCR items, clinical examination (item 1) and reported sleep respiratory symptoms (item 2) ameliorated significantly (<0.005). However, hyperactivity or inattention (item 3) decreased significantly (<0.005) after treatment only in T&A group, while no differences in AHI and SCR scores occurred in the medically treated group. At T1, SCR was positive in 95.6 % of children with AHI ≥1, with a concordance of 100 % in the T&A and RME groups, resulting in a positive predictive value of 100 %. A poor concordance (38.3 % in T&A group and 53.4 % in RME group) was found when SCR < 6.5. Children with SCR ≥ 6.5 at T1 showed higher AHI compared to patients with SCR < 6.5 (5.7 ± 5.9 ev/h vs 1.78 ± 1.76 ev/h; p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: SCR emerges as a potentially useful instrument for follow-up of children with OSA after treatment.
Authors: R Arens; J M McDonough; A T Costarino; S Mahboubi; C E Tayag-Kier; G Maislin; R J Schwab; A I Pack Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2001-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Carole L Marcus; Reneé H Moore; Carol L Rosen; Bruno Giordani; Susan L Garetz; H Gerry Taylor; Ron B Mitchell; Raouf Amin; Eliot S Katz; Raanan Arens; Shalini Paruthi; Hiren Muzumdar; David Gozal; Nina Hattiangadi Thomas; Janice Ware; Dean Beebe; Karen Snyder; Lisa Elden; Robert C Sprecher; Paul Willging; Dwight Jones; John P Bent; Timothy Hoban; Ronald D Chervin; Susan S Ellenberg; Susan Redline Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter Durdik; Anna Sujanska; Stanislava Suroviakova; Melania Evangelisti; Peter Banovcin; Maria Pia Villa Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 4.062