Carol M Greco1,2, Lan Yu3, Kelly L Johnston4, Nathan E Dodds4, Natalia E Morone3, Ronald M Glick4,5, Michael J Schneider6, Mary Lou Klem7, Christine E McFarland4,5, Suzanne Lawrence4, Jason Colditz3, Catherine C Maihoefer4, Wayne B Jonas8, Neal D Ryan4,5, Paul A Pilkonis4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. grecocm@upmc.edu. 2. University of Pittsburgh Center for Integrative Medicine, 580 South Aiken Avenue, Suite 310, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA. grecocm@upmc.edu. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. University of Pittsburgh Center for Integrative Medicine, 580 South Aiken Avenue, Suite 310, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA. 6. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 7. Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 8. Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Nonspecific factors that accompany healthcare treatments, such as patients' attitudes and expectations, are important parts of the experience of care and can influence outcomes. However, no precise, concise, and generalizable instruments to measure these factors exist. We report on the development and calibration of new item banks, titled the Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL), that assess nonspecific factors across a broad range of treatments and conditions. METHODS: The instrument development methodology of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) was used. Patient focus groups and clinician interviews informed our HEAL conceptual model. Literature searches of eight databases yielded over 500 instruments and resulted in an initial item pool of several thousand items. After qualitative item analysis, including cognitive interviewing, 296 items were included in field testing. The calibration sample included 1657 respondents, 1400 obtained through an Internet panel and 257 from conventional and integrative medicine clinics. Following exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, the HEAL item banks were calibrated using item response theory. RESULTS: The final HEAL item banks were Patient-Provider Connection (57 items), Healthcare Environment (25 items), Treatment Expectancy (27 items), Positive Outlook (27 items), and Spirituality (26 items). Short forms were also developed from each item bank. A six-item short form, Attitudes toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM), was also created. CONCLUSIONS: HEAL item banks provided substantial information across a broad range of each construct. HEAL item banks showed initial evidence of predictive and concurrent validity, suggesting that they are suitable for measuring nonspecific factors in treatment.
PURPOSE: Nonspecific factors that accompany healthcare treatments, such as patients' attitudes and expectations, are important parts of the experience of care and can influence outcomes. However, no precise, concise, and generalizable instruments to measure these factors exist. We report on the development and calibration of new item banks, titled the Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL), that assess nonspecific factors across a broad range of treatments and conditions. METHODS: The instrument development methodology of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) was used. Patient focus groups and clinician interviews informed our HEAL conceptual model. Literature searches of eight databases yielded over 500 instruments and resulted in an initial item pool of several thousand items. After qualitative item analysis, including cognitive interviewing, 296 items were included in field testing. The calibration sample included 1657 respondents, 1400 obtained through an Internet panel and 257 from conventional and integrative medicine clinics. Following exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, the HEAL item banks were calibrated using item response theory. RESULTS: The final HEAL item banks were Patient-Provider Connection (57 items), Healthcare Environment (25 items), Treatment Expectancy (27 items), Positive Outlook (27 items), and Spirituality (26 items). Short forms were also developed from each item bank. A six-item short form, Attitudes toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM), was also created. CONCLUSIONS: HEAL item banks provided substantial information across a broad range of each construct. HEAL item banks showed initial evidence of predictive and concurrent validity, suggesting that they are suitable for measuring nonspecific factors in treatment.
Entities:
Keywords:
Attitude toward complementary medicine; Nonspecific contextual factors in treatment; PROMIS instrument development methodology; Patient experience of care; Patient-reported measures; Patient–provider relationship; Perceptions of the Healthcare Environment; Placebo measurement; Positive Outlook; Spirituality; Treatment expectations
Authors: Dana Gelb Safran; Melinda Karp; Kathryn Coltin; Hong Chang; Angela Li; John Ogren; William H Rogers Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Carol M Greco; Ronald M Glick; Natalia E Morone; Michael J Schneider Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Karen J Sherman; Robert D Wellman; Rene J Hawkes; Elizabeth A Phelan; Tamsin Lee; Judith A Turner Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 2.579
Authors: Cynthia R Long; Anthony J Lisi; Robert D Vining; Robert B Wallace; Stacie A Salsbury; Zacariah K Shannon; Stephanie Halloran; Amy L Minkalis; Lance Corber; Paul G Shekelle; Erin E Krebs; Thad E Abrams; Jon D Lurie; Christine M Goertz Journal: Pain Med Date: 2020-12-12 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Emily A Kringle; I Made Agus Setiawan; Katlyn Golias; Bambang Parmanto; Elizabeth R Skidmore Journal: Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol Date: 2019-06-19
Authors: Carol M Greco; Susan A Gaylord; Kim Faurot; Janice M Weinberg; Paula Gardiner; Isabel Roth; Jessica L Barnhill; Holly N Thomas; Sayali C Dhamne; Christine Lathren; Jose E Baez; Suzanne Lawrence; Tuhina Neogi; Karen E Lasser; Maria Gabriela Castro; Anna Marie White; Sandra Jean Simmons; Cleopatra Ferrao; Dhanesh D Binda; Nandie Elhadidy; Kelly M Eason; Kathleen M McTigue; Natalia E Morone Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-08-27 Impact factor: 2.261
Authors: Stephanie J Sohl; Deanna Befus; Janet A Tooze; Beverly Levine; Shannon L Golden; Nicole Puccinelli-Ortega; Boris C Pasche; Kathryn E Weaver; Kristen Hassmiller Lich Journal: Psychol Health Date: 2021-09-27