Chun Nok Lam1, Chris Ruth2, Chih-Ping Chou3, David S Black3. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. Emperor's College of Traditional Oriental Medicine, Santa Monica, CA, USA. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
Background: Telephone calls and text messages function as cues to elicit patient behavior. Objective: We tested the effect of telephone call and text message reminders on patient return to acupuncture follow-up treatment. Design: This is a randomized controlled trial. Setting and Subjects: We recruited adults visiting an acupuncture clinic for a new treatment consultation. Our sample contained 120 participants with 40 per study group. Interventions: Consenting patients were randomized to 1 of 3 study exposures: single voice call, single text message, or treatment as usual (TAU/no reminder). Exposures were sent 3 days after patient's initial treatment. Outcome Measures: Data from clinic charts were abstracted to quantify the absence/presence of a follow-up treatment return in the 30 days after initial treatment. Participants provided self-report of pain symptoms 10 and 30 days after initial treatment on the pain disability index (PDI) to measure change in PDI by return to follow-up treatment as a secondary outcome. Results: Telephone call (56%, P = 0.98) and text message (57%, P = 0.99) groups showed similar proportion of follow-up treatment returns compared with TAU group (57%). Presence of a follow-up appointment scheduled at the initial treatment predicted patient treatment return (odds ratio: 5.87, P < 0.01). Follow-up treatment return predicted reduced PDI scores at day 30 (β = -3.09, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Adding a 1-time telephone call or text message reminder to standard clinic practice did not improve patient return to acupuncture follow-up treatment within 30 days of initial treatment. Scheduling a future appointment date at initial treatment visit may improve treatment return, and return attendance appears protective of pain disability in the short term. Copyright 2021, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
Background: Telephone calls and text messages function as cues to elicit patient behavior. Objective: We tested the effect of telephone call and text message reminders on patient return to acupuncture follow-up treatment. Design: This is a randomized controlled trial. Setting and Subjects: We recruited adults visiting an acupuncture clinic for a new treatment consultation. Our sample contained 120 participants with 40 per study group. Interventions: Consenting patients were randomized to 1 of 3 study exposures: single voice call, single text message, or treatment as usual (TAU/no reminder). Exposures were sent 3 days after patient's initial treatment. Outcome Measures: Data from clinic charts were abstracted to quantify the absence/presence of a follow-up treatment return in the 30 days after initial treatment. Participants provided self-report of pain symptoms 10 and 30 days after initial treatment on the pain disability index (PDI) to measure change in PDI by return to follow-up treatment as a secondary outcome. Results: Telephone call (56%, P = 0.98) and text message (57%, P = 0.99) groups showed similar proportion of follow-up treatment returns compared with TAU group (57%). Presence of a follow-up appointment scheduled at the initial treatment predicted patient treatment return (odds ratio: 5.87, P < 0.01). Follow-up treatment return predicted reduced PDI scores at day 30 (β = -3.09, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Adding a 1-time telephone call or text message reminder to standard clinic practice did not improve patient return to acupuncture follow-up treatment within 30 days of initial treatment. Scheduling a future appointment date at initial treatment visit may improve treatment return, and return attendance appears protective of pain disability in the short term. Copyright 2021, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
Authors: Sanjay Arora; Elizabeth Burner; Sophie Terp; Chun Nok Lam; Aren Nercisian; Vivek Bhatt; Michael Menchine Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Chun Nok Lam; Dale Murnane; Chris Ruth; Yun Kim; Chih-Ping Chou; David S Black Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 2.579
Authors: Felicity L Bishop; Lucy Yardley; Cyrus Cooper; Paul Little; George Lewith Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 3.659
Authors: Hugh MacPherson; Alexandra C Maschino; George Lewith; Nadine E Foster; Claudia M Witt; Claudia Witt; Andrew J Vickers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 3.240