Literature DB >> 26562798

Utility of Helicobacter spp. associated GFD markers for detecting avian fecal pollution in natural waters of two continents.

W Ahmed1, V J Harwood2, K Nguyen2, S Young2, K Hamilton3, S Toze4.   

Abstract

Avian fecal droppings may negatively impact environmental water quality due to the presence of high concentrations of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) and zoonotic pathogens. This study was aimed at evaluating the performance characteristics and utility of a Helicobacter spp. associated GFD marker by screening 265 fecal and wastewater samples from a range of avian and non-avian host groups from two continents (Brisbane, Australia and Florida, USA). The host-prevalence and -specificity of this marker among fecal and wastewater samples tested from Brisbane were 0.58 and 0.94 (maximum value of 1.00). These values for the Florida fecal samples were 0.30 (host-prevalence) and 1.00 (host-specificity). The concentrations of the GFD markers in avian and non-avian fecal nucleic acid samples were measured at a test concentration of 10 ng of nucleic acid at Brisbane and Florida laboratories using the quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay. The mean concentrations of the GFD marker in avian fecal nucleic acid samples (5.2 × 10(3) gene copies) were two orders of magnitude higher than non-avian fecal nucleic acid samples (8.6 × 10(1) gene copies). The utility of this marker was evaluated by testing water samples from the Brisbane River, Brisbane and a freshwater creek in Florida. Among the 18 water samples tested from the Brisbane River, 83% (n = 18) were positive for the GFD marker, and the concentrations ranged from 6.0 × 10(1)-3.2 × 10(2) gene copies per 100 mL water. In all, 92% (n = 25) water samples from the freshwater creek in Florida were also positive for the GFD marker with concentrations ranging from 2.8 × 10(1)-1.3 × 10(4) gene copies per 100 mL water. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the GFD marker is highly specific to avian host groups, and could be used as a reliable marker to detect the presence and amount of avian fecal pollution in environmental waters. Crown
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avian fecal pollution; Fecal indicator bacteria; Microbial source tracking; Molecular markers; Quantitative PCR; Wastewater

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26562798     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.10.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  8 in total

1.  Occurrence of Host-Associated Fecal Markers on Child Hands, Household Soil, and Drinking Water in Rural Bangladeshi Households.

Authors:  Alexandria B Boehm; Dan Wang; Ayse Ercumen; Meghan Shea; Angela R Harris; Orin C Shanks; Catherine Kelty; Alvee Ahmed; Zahid Hayat Mahmud; Benjamin F Arnold; Claire Chase; Craig Kullmann; John M Colford; Stephen P Luby; Amy J Pickering
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2016-11-08

2.  Presence of microbial and chemical source tracking markers in roof-harvested rainwater and catchment systems for the detection of fecal contamination.

Authors:  M Waso; T Ndlovu; P H Dobrowsky; S Khan; W Khan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Level of contamination in the feces of several species at major inland pollution sources in the drainage basin of Yeoja Bay, Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Sang Hyeon Jeong; Soon Bum Shin; Ji Hee Lee; Ji Young Kwon; Hee Chung Lee; Seon-Jae Kim; Kwang Soo Ha
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Evidence of Avian and Possum Fecal Contamination in Rainwater Tanks as Determined by Microbial Source Tracking Approaches.

Authors:  W Ahmed; K A Hamilton; P Gyawali; S Toze; C N Haas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources.

Authors:  Derek Rothenheber; Stephen Jones
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Urbanization Impacts the Physicochemical Characteristics and Abundance of Fecal Markers and Bacterial Pathogens in Surface Water.

Authors:  Tianma Yuan; Kiran Kumar Vadde; Jonathan D Tonkin; Jianjun Wang; Jing Lu; Zimeng Zhang; Yixin Zhang; Alan J McCarthy; Raju Sekar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The Use of Ribosomal RNA as a Microbial Source Tracking Target Highlights the Assay Host-Specificity Requirement in Water Quality Assessments.

Authors:  Annastiina Rytkönen; Ananda Tiwari; Anna-Maria Hokajärvi; Sari Uusheimo; Asko Vepsäläinen; Tiina Tulonen; Tarja Pitkänen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Comparative Analysis of Fecal Microbiomes From Wild Waterbirds to Poultry, Cattle, Pigs, and Wastewater Treatment Plants for a Microbial Source Tracking Approach.

Authors:  Amine M Boukerb; Cyril Noël; Emmanuelle Quenot; Bernard Cadiou; Julien Chevé; Laure Quintric; Alexandre Cormier; Luc Dantan; Michèle Gourmelon
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 5.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.