| Literature DB >> 26561822 |
Lei Zhang1, Qianjiahua Liao2, Shiguang Shao3, Nan Zhang4, Qiushi Shen5, Cheng Liu6.
Abstract
Heavy metal (Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb) pollution, fractionation, and ecological risks in the sediments of Lake Chaohu (Eastern China), its eleven inflowing rivers and its only outflowing river were studied. An improved BCR (proposed by the European Community Bureau of Reference) sequential extraction procedure was applied to fractionate heavy metals within sediments, a geoaccumulation index was used to assess the extent of heavy metal pollution, and a risk assessment code was applied to evaluate potential ecological risks. Heavy metals in the Shuangqiao and Nanfei Rivers were generally higher than the other studied sites. Of the three Lake Chaohu sites, the highest concentrations were identified in western Chaohu. Heavy metal pollution and ecological risks in the lake's only outflowing river were similar to those in the eastern region of the lake, to which the river is connected. Heavy metal concentrations occurred in the following order: Cd > Zn > Cu > Pb ≈ Ni ≈ Cr. Cr, Ni, and Cu made up the largest proportion of the residual fraction, while Cd was the most prominent metal in the exchangeable and carbonate-included fraction. Cd posed the greatest potential ecological risk; the heavy metals generally posed risks in the following order: Cd > Zn > Cu > Ni > Pb > Cr.Entities:
Keywords: Lake Chaohu; ecological risk; heavy metal; sediment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26561822 PMCID: PMC4661636 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph121114115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Map of the sampling sites showing 11 rivers flowing into and one river (the Yuxi River) flowing out of Lake Chaohu.
Criteria for the accumulation index (Igeo) and risk assessment code (RAC).
| RAC Classes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class | Pollution Status | F1 (%) | Class | Risk | |
| <0 | 0 | unpolluted | <1 | 1 | No risk |
| 0–1 | 1 | unpolluted to moderate | 1–10 | 2 | Low risk |
| 1–2 | 2 | moderate | 11–30 | 3 | Moderate risk |
| 2–3 | 3 | moderate to heavy | 31–50 | 4 | High risk |
| 3–4 | 4 | Heavy | >50 | 5 | Very high risk |
| 4–5 | 5 | Heavy to extreme | |||
| >5 | 6 | extreme | |||
Water content (W), loss on ignition (LOI), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) of sediment samples.
| Groups | Sampling Sites | W | LOI | TN * | TP * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (%) | (‰) | (‰) | ||
| Inflowing rivers | Nanfei River (NF) | 63.5 | 6.44 | 1.80 | 3.09 |
| Shiwuli River (SW) | 59.8 | 6.22 | 1.65 | 1.04 | |
| Tangxi River (TX) | 59.5 | 5.24 | 1.54 | 0.49 | |
| Paihe River (PH) | 53.1 | 4.38 | 1.33 | 1.07 | |
| Hangbu River (HB) | 54.6 | 4.21 | 0.38 | 0.52 | |
| Baishitian River (BS) | 72.3 | 7.78 | 2.62 | 0.62 | |
| Zhaohe River (ZH) | 62.0 | 4.90 | 1.32 | 0.60 | |
| Shuangqiao River (SQ) | 82.7 | 13.42 | 3.63 | 2.32 | |
| Zhegao River (ZG) | 72.4 | 7.57 | 1.88 | 0.69 | |
| Qiyang River (QY) | 63.7 | 7.07 | 1.63 | 0.41 | |
| Tongyang River (TY) | 54.6 | 5.66 | 1.83 | 0.63 | |
| Lake Chaohu | Western Chaohu (WC) | 68.6 | 8.37 | 2.39 | 0.95 |
| Middle Chaohu (MC) | 59.0 | 6.65 | 1.82 | 0.49 | |
| Eastern Chaohu (EC) | 68.0 | 9.93 | 2.52 | 0.60 | |
| Outflowing river | Yuxi River (YX) | 47.9 | 5.50 | 0.94 | 0.25 |
* TN and TP of the inflowing rivers are derived from Zhang et al. 2015 [35].
Figure 2Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb concentrations in sediments from 15 sampling sites. Specifically, there are 11 samples (NF, SW, TX, PH, HB, BS, ZH, SQ, ZG, QY, and TY) corresponding to 11 rivers flowing into Lake Chaohu, 3 samples (WC, MC, and EC) from Chaohu, and 1 sample (YX) from the river flowing out of Chaohu.
Figure 3Dendrogram derived from the hierarchical cluster analysis of heavy metal concentrations in the analyzed sediments.
Pearson correlation matrix for metal concentrations, W, LOI, TP, and TN.
| Cr | Ni | Cu | Zn | Cd | Pb | W | TP | TN | LOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cr | 1 | |||||||||
| Ni | 0.905 | 1 | ||||||||
| Cu | 0.853 | 0.634 | 1 | |||||||
| Zn | 0.364 | 0.172 | 0.496 | 1 | ||||||
| Cd | 0.644 | 0.467 | 0.589 | 0.372 | 1 | |||||
| Pb | 0.594 | 0.631 | 0.489 | 0.738 | 0.316 | 1 | ||||
| W | 0.633 | 0.604 | 0.589 | 0.262 | 0.566 | 0.360 | 1 | |||
| TP | 0.442 | 0.142 | 0.620 | 0.887 | 0.635 | 0.491 | 0.407 | 1 | ||
| TN | 0.709 | 0.662 | 0.526 | 0.283 | 0.649 | 0.425 | 0.856 | 0.419 | 1 | |
| LOI | 0.867 | 0.839 | 0.642 | 0.228 | 0.692 | 0.450 | 0.831 | 0.376 | 0.900 | 1 |
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Figure 4Geoaccumulation index (Igeo) in sediments from 15 sampling sites.
Figure 5Percentages of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb existing as different fractions of the BCR sequential extraction procedure for sediments sampled at 15 sites. F1, exchangeable and carbonate included fraction; F2, reducible fraction; F3, oxidizable fraction; and F4, residual fraction.
Potential ecological risk classes based on RAC.
| Sampling Sites | Cr | Ni | Cu | Zn | Cd | Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NF | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 |
| SW | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| PH | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
| HB | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| BS | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| ZH | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| SQ | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 1 |
| ZG | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| QY | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| TY | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| WC | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| MC | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| EC | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| YX | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2 |