| Literature DB >> 26561414 |
Fitsum Dulo1, Aklilu Feleke1, Barbara Szonyi2, Reinhard Fries3, Maximilian P O Baumann4, Delia Grace5.
Abstract
Toxigenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) are an important cause of gastroenteritis in developing countries. In Ethiopia, gastroenteritis due to food-borne disease is a leading cause of death. Yet, there is no surveillance for E. coli O157 and little is known about the carriage of this pathogen in Ethiopia's livestock. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and levels of antimicrobial resistance of E. coli O157 in goat meat, feces, and environmental samples collected at a large abattoir in the Somali region of Ethiopia. The samples were enriched in modified tryptone broth containing novobiocin, and plated onto sorbitol MacConkey agar. Isolates were confirmed using indole test and latex agglutination. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using the disk diffusion method. A total of 235 samples, including 93 goat carcass swabs, 93 cecal contents, 14 water, 20 hand, and 15 knife swabs were collected. Overall, six (2.5%) samples were contaminated with E. coli O157 of which two (2.1%) were isolated from cecal contents, three (3.2%) from carcass swabs, and one (7.1%) from water. All isolates were resistant to at least two of the 18 antimicrobials tested. Two isolates (33.3%) were resistant to more than five antimicrobials. Abattoir facilities and slaughter techniques were conducive to carcass contamination. This study highlights how poor hygiene and slaughter practice can result in contaminated meat, which is especially risky in Ethiopia because of the common practice of eating raw meat. We detect multi-resistance to drugs not used in goats, suggesting that drugs used to treat human infections may be the originators of antimicrobial resistance in livestock in this ecosystem. The isolation of multidrug-resistant E. coli O157 from goats from a remote pastoralist system highlights the need for global action on regulating and monitoring antimicrobial use in both human and animal populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26561414 PMCID: PMC4641637 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Antimicrobials used and interpretation of resistance.
| Antimicrobial disc | Code | Concentration (μg) | Diameter of zone of inhibition (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resistant (≤) | Intermediate | Susceptible (≥) | |||
|
| AMP | 10 | 13 | 14–16 | 17 |
|
| AMC | 20/10 | 13 | 14–17 | 18 |
|
| CTX | 30 | 22 | 23–35 | 26 |
|
| CRO | 30 | 19 | 20–22 | 23 |
|
| FOX | 30 | 14 | 15–17 | 18 |
|
| CXM | 30 | 14 | 15–17 | 18 |
|
| C | 30 | 12 | 13–17 | 18 |
|
| CIP | 5 | 15 | 16–20 | 21 |
|
| E | 15 | 13 | 14–22 | 23 |
|
| CN | 10 | 12 | 13–14 | 15 |
|
| K | 30 | 13 | 14–17 | 18 |
|
| NA | 30 | 13 | 14–18 | 19 |
|
| F | 50 | 14 | 15–16 | 17 |
|
| NOR | 10 | 12 | 13–16 | 17 |
|
| S | 10 | 11 | 12–14 | 15 |
|
| SXT | 25 | 10 | 11–15 | 16 |
|
| S3 | 300 | 12 | 13–16 | 17 |
|
| TE | 30 | 11 | 12–14 | 15 |
Antimicrobial resistance patterns of E. coli O157 isolates.
| Isolate type |
|
|---|---|
| water | AMP,E |
| carcass | E,F |
| carcass | AMP,E,F |
| carcass | AMP,FOX,E |
| cecum | AMP,E,S,SXT,S3,TE |
| cecum | AMP,AMC,E,F,FOX,S,SXT,S3,TE |
aKey for Table 2: AMP: ampicillin, AMC: amoxycillin-clavulanic acid, FOX: cefoxitin, E: erythromycin, F: nitrofurantoin, S: streptomycin, SXT: sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, S3: sulfonamides, TE: tetracycline
Checklist and results of observational survey on abattoir hygiene.
| Workers’ hygiene | Use of protective clothing | Gown -14/14 (100%) |
|---|---|---|
| Protective clothing is clean | 2/14 (14%) | |
| Cuts/wounds covered with waterproof dressing | 2/4 (50%) | |
| Means of washing and disinfection of personal slaughter equipment | Plain water in buckets14/14 (100%) | |
| Slaughter knife free from damages and dirt | 0/14 (0%) | |
| Slaughter knife rested on clean surface during carcass processing | 0/14 (0%) | |
| Regular hand washing during work (before, during and after processing each carcass) | 0/14 (0%) | |
| Received job-related training on hygiene | 3/14 (21.4%) | |
|
| Latrine/toilet on premises | Absent |
| Water in latrine | Not applicable | |
| Soap in latrine | Not applicable | |
| Tissue paper in latrine | Not applicable | |
| Paper towel in latrine | Not applicable | |
|
| Meat inspector veterinarian | Present |
| Rodent and insect control | Absent | |
| Ventilation | Inadequate | |
| Running water in slaughter hall | Absent | |
| Soap in slaughter hall | Absent | |
| Disinfectant in slaughter hall | Absent | |
| Electricity/lighting | Inadequate | |
| Separation of clean and dirty areas | Absent |