| Literature DB >> 31011268 |
Tizazu Zenebe Zelelie1, Demissew Shenkute Gebreyes2, Alemnesh Tesema Tilahun3, Hillary A Craddock4, Nigus Zegeye Gishen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diarrheal disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity for under-five children in Ethiopia. The purpose of this study was to investigate the behavioral and socioeconomic risk factors, etiology, and drug susceptibility of bacteria isolated from under-five children with acute diarrhea who were treated at Debre Berhan Referral Hospital or Health Center in Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Diarrhea; Ethiopia; Under-five children; drug resistance; enteropathogen
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31011268 PMCID: PMC6460452 DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v29i2.7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ethiop J Health Sci ISSN: 1029-1857
Socio-demographic data of the guardians or/parents in two Debre Berhan Health Facilities from November 2015 to August 2016
| Variable for the | Response | Frequency | Percent (%) |
| Marital status | Currently married | 158 | 96.9 |
| Currently single | 5 | 3.1 | |
| Religion | Orthodox | 117 | 71.8 |
| Muslim | 26 | 16.0 | |
| Protestant | 20 | 12.3 | |
| Ethnicity | Amhara | 98 | 60.1 |
| Oromo | 28 | 17.2 | |
| Tigre | 37 | 22.7 | |
| Educational status | Illiterate | 21 | 12.9 |
| Primary school | 19 | 11.7 | |
| Secondary school | 22 | 13.5 | |
| College or university | 101 | 62.0 | |
| Work status | Unemployed | 26 | 16.0 |
| Daily worker | 17 | 10.4 | |
| Monthly salary | 72 | 44.2 | |
| Others | 48 | 29.4 |
Other includes farmer, merchant, students
Socio-demographic and clinical data of under-five children who presented to two Debre Berhan, Ethiopia Health Facilities from November 2015 to August 2016
| Variables for the child | Frequency | Percentage | |
| Sex | Male | 99 | 60.7% |
| Female | 64 | 39.3% | |
| Age in months | 0–12 | 75 | 46.0% |
| 13–24 | 52 | 31.9% | |
| 25–60 | 36 | 22.1% | |
| Fever | No | 78 | 47.9% |
| Yes | 85 | 52.1% | |
| Stool appearance | Bloody | 18 | 11.0% |
| Mucoid | 82 | 50.3% | |
| Watery | 63 | 38.7% | |
| Treatment in the last two | No | 103 | 63.2% |
| Yes | 60 | 36.8% |
Results of chi-squared test comparing socioeconomic and demographic factors to diarrhea outcomes in under-five children who presented to two Debre Berhan, Health Facilities from November 2015 to August 2016
| Variables | Enteropathogen | P-value | Bacterial | P-value | Parasites | P-value |
| Hand washing practice | ||||||
| Poor | 58(77.3%) | 43(57.3%) | P=0.006 | 15(20.0%) | ||
| Good | 33(37.5%) | 32(36.4%) | 1(1.1%) | |||
| Defecation site | ||||||
| Traditional pit latrine | 63(62.4%) | P=0.099 | 51(50.5%) | P=0.338 | 12(11.9%) | P=0.488 |
| Ventilated pit latrine | 17(44.7%) | 15(39.5%) | 2(5.3%) | |||
| Open field | 11(45.8%) | 9 (37.5%) | 2(8.3%) | |||
| Latrine cleaning frequency | ||||||
| Every day | 12(52.2%) | P=0.188 | 10(43.5%) | P=0.294 | 2(8.7%) | P=0.904 |
| 1–2 times per week | 27(47.4%) | 22(38.6%) | 5(8.8%) | |||
| Not cleaned | 52(62.7%) | 43(51.8%) | 9(10.8%) | |||
| Contact with domestic animals | ||||||
| No | 39(54.2%) | P=0.412 | 34(47.2%) | P=0.457 | 5(6.9%) | P=0.204 |
| Yes | 52(57.1%) | 41(45.1%) | 11(12.1%) | |||
| Cleaning of utensil for child feeding | ||||||
| Poor | 59(83.1%) | 44 (62.0%) | 15(21.1%) | |||
| Good | 32(34.8%) | 31(33.7%) | 1(1.1%) |
Prevalence of pathogens in stool from under-five children who presented to two Debre Berhan, Health Facilities from November 2015 to August 2016
| Pathogen | Samples | Samples testing | Samples testing | Samples testing |
| 47(51.6%) | 7(38.9%) | 31(49.2%) | 9(11.0%) | |
| 5(5.5%) | 1(5.5%) | 1(1.6%) | 2(2.4%) | |
| 3(3.3%) | 3(16.6%) | 0 | 0 | |
| 11(12.1%) | 0 | 8(12.7%) | 3(3.6%) | |
| 7(7.7%) | 0 | 4(6.3%) | 3(3.6%) | |
| 2(2.2%) | 0 | 2(3.2%) | 0 | |
| 5(5.5%) | 3(16.6%) | 2(3.2%) | 0 | |
| 4(4.4%) | 0 | 2(3.2%) | 2(2.4%) | |
| 3(3.3%) | 0 | 0 | 3(3.6%) | |
| 2(2.2%) | 0 | 0 | 2(2.4%) | |
| 2(2.2%) | 0 | 0 | 2(2.4%) |
Antibiotic resistance of bacterial isolates from stool samples from November 2015 to August 2016
| Name of isolates | Number of strains (%) resistance to antibiotics | |||||||||
| AMX | AM | C | CF | CIP | GM | CRO | TE | NA | SX | |
| 5 | 29 | 20 | 8(17) | 2(4.3) | 10 | 4(8.5) | 38 | 7 | 41(87.2) | |
| 2(40) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(20) | 0(0) | 2(40) | 4(80) | 2(40) | |
| 0(0) | 1 (33.3) | 1 (33.3) | 0(0) | 0(0) | (0) | 0(0) | 2 (66.7) | 0(0) | 1(33.3) | |
| 4(36.4) | 3 (27.3) | 2 (18.2) | 2(18.2) | 0(0) | 4 (36.4) | 0(0) | 9 (81.8) | 1(9.1) | 8(72.7) | |
| 3(42.9) | 2 (28.6) | 1 (14.3) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 3 (42.9) | 1(14.3) | 2 (28.6) | 4(57.1) | 2(28.6) | |
| 0(0) | 1(50) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(50) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(50) | 0(0) | |
AMX: Amoxicillin; NA: Nalidixicaci; AM: Ampicillin; CF: Cephalothin; TE: Tetracycline; C: Chloramphenicol; CIP: Ciprofloxacin; SXT: Trimethoprim-Sulphamethazole; GM: Gentamicin; CRO: Ceftriaxone
Multi-drug resistance antibiogram pattern of bacterial isolates in two Debre Berhan, Health Facilities from November 2015 to August 2016
| Isolates | Resistance antibiogram | Number |
| CIP, NA, SX | 2 | |
| C, TE, SX | 10 | |
| AMX, CRO, NA, SX | 2 | |
| AMX, AM, C, TE | 2 | |
| AM, GM, TE, SX | 4 | |
| C, TE, NA, SX | 2 | |
| AM, C, CRO, TE | 2 | |
| CF, CIP, GM, TE | 2 | |
| AMX, AM, CF, TE, NA | 2 | |
| AMX, AM, CRO, TE, NA | 2 | |
| AM, C, CF, TE, NA | 2 | |
| AM, C, GM, TE, SX | 6 | |
| AM, CIP, GM, TE, NA, SX | 2 | |
| AMX, TE, NA | 2 | |
| AMX, GM, TE, SX | 3 | |
| AM, GM, TE, SX | 2 |
AMX: Amoxicillin; NA: Nalidixicaci; AM: Ampicillin; CF: Cephalothin; TE: Tetracycline; C: Chloramphenicol; CIP: Ciprofloxacin; SXT: Trimethoprim-Sulphamethazole; GM: Gentamicin; CRO: Ceftriaxone