Literature DB >> 26559523

Social influence and peer review: Why traditional peer review is no longer adapted, and how it should evolve.

Daniel Fisher1, Nikolaos Parisis1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26559523      PMCID： PMC4693514          DOI： 10.15252/embr.201541256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN： 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  How to review a paper.

Authors:  Dale J Benos; Kevin L Kirk; John E Hall
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research.

Authors:  C Glenn Begley; Lee M Ellis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Accelerating scientific publication in biology.

Authors:  Ronald D Vale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks.

Authors:  Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik; Peter Sheridan Dodds; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Herding, social influences and behavioural bias in scientific research: Simple awareness of the hidden pressures and beliefs that influence our thinking can help to preserve objectivity.

Authors:  Michelle Baddeley
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Blinded by the light: Anonymization should be used in peer review to prevent bias, not protect referees.

Authors:  David M Shaw
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz; Peter Franks; Mitchell D Feldman; Martha Gerrity; Cindy Byrne; William M Tierney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.

Authors:  Richard Smith
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 18.000
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Social influence and peer review - impact factor and citation.

Authors:  Haitham Sobhy
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Taking peer review seriously.

Authors:  Bernard Moussian
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Toss the water, keep the child.

Authors:  Inna M Sokolova
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 8.807
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.