Literature DB >> 26174615

Blinded by the light: Anonymization should be used in peer review to prevent bias, not protect referees.

David M Shaw1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26174615      PMCID： PMC4552481          DOI： 10.15252/embr.201540943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN： 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Cover the eyes of Lady Justice.

Authors:  Johannes A Schmid
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Nature journals offer double-blind review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Peer reviewers can meet journals' criteria for authorship.

Authors:  Thomas C Erren; Michael Erren; David M Shaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-16
  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Social influence and peer review: Why traditional peer review is no longer adapted, and how it should evolve.

Authors:  Daniel Fisher; Nikolaos Parisis
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Bias in cervical total disc replacement trials.

Authors:  Kristen Radcliff; Sean Siburn; Hamadi Murphy; Barrett Woods; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

Review 3.  Use and Understanding of Anonymization and De-Identification in the Biomedical Literature: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Raphaël Chevrier; Vasiliki Foufi; Christophe Gaudet-Blavignac; Arnaud Robert; Christian Lovis
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 5.428
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.