| Literature DB >> 26557777 |
Sarka Lukesova1, Vladimira Vroblova2, Jindrich Tosner3, Jindrich Kopecky4, Iva Sedlakova3, Eva Čermáková5, Doris Vokurkova3, Otakar Kopecky6.
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY: A number of observations have indicated that the immune system plays a significant role in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In cases of EOC, the prognostic significance of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes has not been clearly explained yet. The aim is to determine the phenotype and activation molecules of cytotoxic T cell and NK cell subpopulations and to compare their representation in malignant ascites and peripheral blood in patients with ovarian cancer.Entities:
Keywords: NK cells; NKG2D; flow cytometry; ovarian cancer; tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes
Year: 2015 PMID: 26557777 PMCID: PMC4631306 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2015.54388
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contemp Oncol (Pozn) ISSN: 1428-2526
Clinical and histopathological characteristics of patients with ovarian carcinoma
| Patient number | Age (years) | FIGO classification | Histology | Grade | Radical surgery Yes/No | Neoadjuvant treatment Yes/No | Number of treatment lines | Time to first progression (days) | Overall survival (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | IIIC | serous | 1 | no | yes | 3 | 343 | 986 |
| 2 | 56 | IIIC | serous | 2 | yes | yes | 2 | 0 | 2315 |
| 3 | 53 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | no | 5 | 719 | 2267 |
| 4 | 62 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | yes | 3 | 993 | 1367 |
| 5 | 51 | IV | serous | 3 | no | no | 1 | no | 134 |
| 6 | 55 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | yes | 5 | 640 | 2374 |
| 7 | 47 | IIC | serous | 3 | yes | no | 5 | 1211 | 2395 |
| 8 | 69 | IIIC | serous | 3 | no | no | 2 | 217 | 754 |
| 9 | 62 | IIIC | serous | 2 | yes | no | 0 | 0 | 2228 |
| 10 | 65 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | no | 4 | 489 | 2093 |
| 11 | 61 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | yes | 1 | 0 | 2262 |
| 12 | 70 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | yes | 5 | 589 | 1321 |
| 13 | 74 | IA | unodifferentiated | 2 | yes | no | 0 | 0 | 2492 |
| 14 | 69 | IIIC | endometrioid | 2 | yes | yes | 2 | 452 | 615 |
| 15 | 69 | IC | endometrioid | 3 | yes | no | 1 | 0 | 2190 |
| 16 | 71 | IV | serous | 3 | no | no | 1 | no | 89 |
| 17 | 64 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | no | 2 | 580 | 963 |
| 18 | 82 | IIIC | endometrioid | 3 | yes | no | 1 | 0 | 338 |
| 19 | 64 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | yes | 2 | 450 | 529 |
| 20 | 55 | IIIA | endometrioid | 2 | yes | no | 5 | 938 | 1222 |
| 21 | 51 | IIIC | undifferentiated | 3 | yes | no | 2 | 0 | 2169 |
| 22 | 78 | IIIB | serous | 3 | no | no | 1 | NO | 267 |
| 23 | 65 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | no | 1 | 0 | 2116 |
| 24 | 83 | IIIC | endometrioid | 2 | no | no | 2 | 377 | 583 |
| 25 | 40 | IIIA | serous | 1 | yes | no | 1 | 0 | 2499 |
| 26 | 64 | IIIC | serous | 1 | yes | no | 1 | 0 | 2190 |
| 27 | 51 | IV | serous | 3 | yes | no | 1 | 0 | 2563 |
| 28 | 71 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | yes | 4 | 854 | 2041 |
| 29 | 57 | IB | endometrioid | 2 | yes | no | 1 | 0 | 2116 |
| 30 | 74 | IIIA | serous | 3 | no | no | 4 | 102 | 2081 |
| 31 | 67 | IIIC | serous | 3 | no | no | 0 | no | 28 |
| 32 | 79 | IIIC | serous | 3 | no | no | 0 | no | 63 |
| 33 | 77 | IIIC | endometrioid | 2 | no | no | 0 | no | 54 |
| 34 | 56 | IIIA | serous | 3 | yes | no | 5 | 703 | 1996 |
| 35 | 72 | IIIC | undifferentiated | 3 | no | no | 0 | 114 | 707 |
| 36 | 61 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | no | 0 | 0 | 2224 |
| 37 | 71 | IIIC | mucinous | 3 | yes | no | 3 | 185 | 593 |
| 38 | 59 | Ia | mucinous | 2 | yes | no | 3 | 279 | 2268 |
| 39 | 56 | IIIB | serous | 3 | yes | no | 0 | 0 | 2002 |
| 40 | 54 | IIIA | endometrioid | 3 | yes | no | 1 | 428 | 1761 |
| 41 | 72 | IIIA | undifferentiated | 3 | yes | no | 1 | 0 | 2122 |
| 42 | 61 | IIIB | undifferentiated | 3 | yes | no | 0 | 131 | 907 |
| 43 | 74 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | no | 1 | 0 | 2190 |
| 44 | 66 | IIIB | endometrioid | 2 | yes | yes | 5 | 440 | 1596 |
| 45 | 72 | IIIb | mucinous | 3 | no | no | 0 | no | 25 |
| 46 | 68 | IIIC | undifferentiated | 3 | no | no | 0 | no | 53 |
| 47 | 48 | IIIA | serous | 2 | yes | no | 1 | 0 | 2105 |
| 48 | 66 | IIIC | serous | 2 | yes | no | 1 | 0 | 2122 |
| 49 | 72 | IIIC | endometrioid | 3 | yes | yes | 2 | 259 | 589 |
| 50 | 61 | IV | serous | 3 | no | no | 0 | no | 130 |
| 51 | 66 | IIIC | serous | 2 | no | no | 0 | no | 53 |
| 52 | 62 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | no | 1 | 1711 | 2240 |
| 53 | 59 | IIIC | serous | 3 | yes | yes | 3 | 154 | 2292 |
Fig. 1Representative dot plots gating for ascitic fluid and peripheral blood; identification of cell populations and expression of various markers from CD45+ cells. (A) Side Scatter (SS) vs. Forward Scatter (FS) plot for identification of leukocytes; (B) Identification of CD45+ lymphocytes; and (C) identification of CD45+CD14– lymphocytes; (D-K) Representative dot plots for each monoclonal antibody used in study
Phenotyping analysis of CD45 positive cells from peripheral blood and malignant ascites from 53 patients with ovarian cancer
| Cell population | Peripheral blood (%) | Ascites (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| CD3+ | 70.9 (61.8–75.1) | 75.0 (71.1–82.4) | 0.097 |
| CD3+/CD69+ | 0.8 (0.2–2.1) | 6.7 (4.5–15.2) | < 0.001 |
| CD3+/CD25+ | 4.9 (3.6–5.8) | 3.7 (2.4–5.3) | 0.381 |
| CD3+/DR+ | 1.4 (0.7–2.8) | 4.0 (1.1–7.0) | 0.068 |
| CD3+/CD4+ | 48.7 (39.1–57.1) | 49.1 (34.1–52.0) | 0.446 |
| CD4+/45RA+ | 8.5 (2.7–11.0) | 2.6 (1.3–5.7) | 0.007 |
| CD4+/45RO+ | 30.6 (19.2–34.2) | 37.7 (25.3–45.1) | 0.013 |
| CD8+ | 21.1 (15.7–24.8) | 30.0 (20.3–36.6) | 0.033 |
| CD3+/CD8+ | 19.1(17.1–20.8) | 28.7 (16.8–33.2) | 0.012 |
| CD3–/8+ | 2.9 (1.2–6.5) | 3.9 (3.0–4.9) | 0.205 |
| CD8+/DR+ | 0.6 (0.3–1.4) | 2.3 (0.7–5.3) | <0.001 |
| CD+/CDaβ+ | 25.6 (8.8 | 37.4 (19.9–52.6) | 0.065 |
| CD8+/CDγδ+ | 0.5 (0.2–2.5) | 0.4 (02–0.8) | 0.698 |
| CD8+/CD57+ | 3.8 (2.7–6.9) | 1.3 (0.5–8.1) | 0.235 |
| CD19+ | 10.6 (7.8–16.7) | 6.8 (4.1–8.6) | 0.009 |
Expression of membrane molecules on the NK cell subsets
| Cell population | Peripheral blood (%) | Ascites (%) | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| CD3–/CD16+/CD56+ | 5.6 (2.7–10.7) | 11.0 (7.1–12.5) | 0.041 |
| CD3+/CD16+/CD56+ | 5.5 (1.2–7.2) | 3.1 (0.6–4.8) | 0.080 |
| CD3–/CD56+ | 11.7 (7.7–13.8) | 12.9 (5.1–15.5) | n.s. |
| CD3–/CD16+ | 8.2 (3.1–12.5) | 12.1 (7.8–15.1) | 0.036 |
| CD56–/CD16+ | 2.1 (0.6–4.8) | 1.5 (0.2–3.9) | n.s. |
| CD56bright | 2.5 (1.9–7.4) | 10.3 (7.0–25.65) | < 0.001 |
| CD56bright from CD56+ | 45.9 (31.5–73.5) | 83.2 (53.7–92.4) | < 0.001 |
| CD56bright 16– | 1.9 (0.9–5.8) | 8.25 (3.8–16.3) | < 0.001 |
| CD56dim 16+ | 4.4 (1.4–7.8) | 1.7 (0.6–6.9) | 0.021 |
| NKG2D+ | 32.3 (25.2–37.6) | 45.05 (30.9–58.1) | 0.034 |
| NKG2D+ from CD56+ | 89.9 (85.0–93.1) | 91.0 (86.5–95.0) | n.s. |
| CD8+/CD56+ | 5.8 (3.2–9.5) | 7.7 (3.75–10.55) | n.s. |
n.s. – not significant
Influence of various immunological cells in ascitic fluids on time to first progression using multivariate model with coefficient of determination of 0.49 with a significance level of p < 0.007
| HR | 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| CD4+RO | 0.996 | 0.911–1.089 | 0.933 |
| CD4+RA | 1.098 | 0.912–1.323 | 0.314 |
| CD3+CD69+ | 0.986 | 0.896–1.085 | 0.771 |
| CD8+CD57+ | 1.157 | 0.796–1.682 | 0.448 |
| CD3+CD25+ | 1.288 | 0.903–1.837 | 0.156 |
| CD8+DR+ | 0.869 | 0.371–2.037 | 0.748 |
| CD3+DR+ | 1.057 | 0.510–2.192 | 0.882 |
| CD3+CD16+CD56+ | 0.945 | 0.668–1.337 | 0.743 |
| CD3–CD16+CD56+ | 0.907 | 0.717–1.147 | 0.406 |
| CD3–CD8+ | 1.160 | 0.904–1.489 | 0.256 |
| CD3+CD8+ | 1.011 | 0.900–1.135 | 0.857 |
| CD19+ | 1.085 | 0.943–1.248 | 0.239 |
| CD8+ | 0.982 | 0.892–1.081 | 0.709 |
| CD4+ | 1.016 | 0.930–1.109 | 0.729 |
| CD3+ | 1.060 | 0.957–1.174 | 0.264 |
Influence of various immunological cells in ascitic fluids on overall survival using multivariate model with coefficient of determination of 0.65 with a significance level of p < 0.001
| HR | 95% CI | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CD4+RO | 0.954 | 0.877–1.037 | 0.272 |
| CD4+RA | 1.037 | 0.924–1.164 | 0.539 |
| CD3+CD69+ | 1.074 | 0.967–1.193 | 0.173 |
| CD8+CD57+ | 1.092 | 0.789–1.153 | 0.596 |
| CD3+CD25+ | 0.848 | 0.603–1.192 | 0.330 |
| CD8+DR+ | 0.897 | 0.332–2.424 | 0.830 |
| CD3+DR+ | 1.066 | 0.472–2.411 | 0.878 |
| CD3+CD16+CD56+ | 1.335 | 1.079–1.652 | 0.014 |
| CD3–CD16+CD56+ | 0.692 | 0.543–0.880 | 0.003 |
| CD3–CD8+ | 1.314 | 1.021–1.691 | 0.044 |
| CD3+CD8+ | 0.850 | 0.753–0.959 | 0.002 |
| CD19+ | 1.085 | 0.947–1.243 | 0.225 |
| CD8+ | 1.021 | 0.927–1.123 | 0.674 |
| CD4+ | 1.213 | 1.038–1.416 | 0.010 |
| CD3+ | 1.000 | 0.895–1.119 | 0.995 |
Fig. 2Potential effect of various immunocompetent cells from ascitic fluid on overall survival calculated using Cox proportional-hazards regression model
Fig. 3Potential effect of various immunocompetent cells from ascitic fluid on length of time to first progression calculated using Cox proportional-hazards regression model