Literature DB >> 26557008

Endosonography guided management of pancreatic fluid collections.

Andreas S Vilmann1, John Menachery1, Shou-Jiang Tang1, Indu Srinivasan1, Peter Vilmann1.   

Abstract

The revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis was adopted by international consensus, and is based on actual local and systemic determinants of disease severity. The local determinant is pancreatic necrosis (sterile or infected), and the systemic determinant is organ failure. Local complications of pancreatitis can include acute peri-pancreatic fluid collection, acute necrotic collection, pseudocyst formation, and walled-off necrosis. Interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been increasing utilized in managing these local complications. After performing a PubMed search, the authors manually applied pre-defined inclusion criteria or a filter to identify publications relevant to EUS and pancreatic collections (PFCs). The authors then reviewed the utility, efficacy, and risks associated with using therapeutic EUS and involved EUS devices in treating PFCs. Due to the development and regulatory approval of improved and novel endoscopic devices specifically designed for transmural drainage of fluid and necrotic debris (access and patency devices), the authors predict continuing evolution in the management of PFCs. We believe that EUS will become an indispensable part of procedures used to diagnose PFCs and perform image-guided interventions. After draining a PFC, the amount of tissue necrosis is the most important predictor of a successful outcome. Hence, it seems logical to classify these collections based on their percentage of necrotic component or debris present when viewed by imaging methods or EUS. Finally, the authors propose an algorithm for managing fluid collections based on their size, location, associated symptoms, internal echogenic patterns, and content.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abscess; Drainage; Endoscopic ultrasound; Pancreas; Pancreatic fluid collection; Patency device; Pseudocyst; Walled of necrosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26557008      PMCID: PMC4631982          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i41.11842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  44 in total

Review 1.  Interventional EUS.

Authors:  Vivek Kaul; Douglas G Adler; Jason D Conway; Francis A Farraye; Sergey V Kantsevoy; Sripathi R Kethu; Richard S Kwon; Petar Mamula; Marcos C Pedrosa; Sarah A Rodriguez; William M Tierney
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage of infected pancreatic fluid collections with placement of covered self-expanding metal stents: a case series.

Authors:  C Fabbri; C Luigiano; V Cennamo; A M Polifemo; L Barresi; E Jovine; M Traina; N D'Imperio; I Tarantino
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Frequency of complications during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in 148 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Shyam Varadarajulu; John D Christein; Charles Mel Wilcox
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.029

4.  One-step, simultaneous double-wire technique facilitates pancreatic pseudocyst and abscess drainage (with videos).

Authors:  Stefan Seewald; Frank Thonke; Tiing-Leong Ang; Salem Omar; Uwe Seitz; Stefan Groth; Yan Zhong; Emre Yekebas; Jakob Izbicki; Nib Soehendra
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections in 116 patients: a comparison of etiologies, drainage techniques, and outcomes.

Authors:  Lawrence C Hookey; Sébastien Debroux; Myriam Delhaye; Marianna Arvanitakis; Olivier Le Moine; Jacques Devière
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Single-step EUS-guided transmural drainage of simple and complicated pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  Mainor R Antillon; Raj J Shah; Gregory Stiegmann; Yang K Chen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Successful stenting in ductal disruption favorably impacts treatment outcomes in patients undergoing transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections.

Authors:  Jessica M Trevino; Jessica M Tevino; Ashutosh Tamhane; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.029

8.  EUS versus surgical cyst-gastrostomy for management of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  Shyam Varadarajulu; Tercio L Lopes; C Mel Wilcox; Ernesto R Drelichman; Meredith L Kilgore; John D Christein
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Shyam Varadarajulu; Ji Young Bang; Bryce S Sutton; Jessica M Trevino; John D Christein; C Mel Wilcox
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  A comparison of direct endoscopic necrosectomy with transmural endoscopic drainage for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  Timothy B Gardner; Prabhleen Chahal; Georgios I Papachristou; Santhi Swaroop Vege; Bret T Petersen; Christopher J Gostout; Mark D Topazian; Naoki Takahashi; Michael G Sarr; Todd H Baron
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  8 in total

1.  A preferable modality for the differentiation of peripancreatic fluid collections: Endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Longsong Li; Danqi Zhao; Zixin Wang; Xueting Wang; Runzi Wang; Yanbo Zeng; Lei Zhang; Ning Zhong; Ying Lv; Enqiang Linghu; Ningli Chai
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.275

Review 2.  Management of Inflammatory Fluid Collections and Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis.

Authors:  Apeksha Shah; Richard Denicola; Cynthia Edirisuriya; Ali A Siddiqui
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12

3.  Safety and Complications of Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound.

Authors:  Monica Saumoy; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19

4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of metal versus plastic stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: metal stents are advantageous.

Authors:  Rebecca Saunders; Jayapal Ramesh; Silvia Cicconi; Jonathan Evans; Vincent S Yip; Michael Raraty; Paula Ghaneh; Robert Sutton; John P Neoptolemos; Christopher Halloran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Identification of research trends concerning application of stent implantation in the treatment of pancreatic diseases by quantitative and biclustering analysis: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Xuan Zhu; Xing Niu; Tao Li; Chang Liu; Lijie Chen; Guang Tan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  Management of patients after recovering from acute severe biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  Georgia Dedemadi; Manolis Nikolopoulos; Ioannis Kalaitzopoulos; George Sgourakis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  New developments in endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapies.

Authors:  Manoop S Bhutani; Ayush Arora
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

8.  Placement of lumen-apposing metal stents to drain pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis can be safely performed on an outpatient basis: A multicenter study.

Authors:  Douglas G Adler; Janak Shah; Jose Nieto; Kenneth Binmoeller; Yasser Bhat; Linda Jo Taylor; Ali A Siddiqui
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.