| Literature DB >> 29103188 |
Apeksha Shah1, Richard Denicola1, Cynthia Edirisuriya1, Ali A Siddiqui2.
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT: Pancreatic fluid collections are a frequent complication of acute pancreatitis. The revised Atlanta criterion classifies chronic fluid collections into pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON). Symptomatic PFCs require drainage options that include surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic approaches. With the advent of newer and more advanced endoscopic tools and expertise, minimally invasive endoscopic drainage has now become the preferred approach. An endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided approach for pancreatic fluid collection drainage is now the preferred endoscopic approach. Both plastic stents and metal stents are efficacious and safe; however, metal stents may offer an advantage, especially in infected pseudocysts and in WON. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy is often required in WON. Lumen apposing metal stents allow for direct endoscopic necrosectomy and debridement through the stent lumen and are now preferred in these patients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with pancreatic duct exploration should be performed concurrent to PFC drainage in patients with suspected PD disruption. PD disruption is associated with an increased severity of pancreatitis, an increased risk of recurrent attacks of pancreatitis and long-term complications, and a decreased rate of PFC resolution after drainage. Ideally, pancreatic ductal disruption should be bridged with endoscopic stenting.Entities:
Keywords: Endoscopy; Pancreatic fluid collections; Pancreatic pseudocyst; Pancreatic walled-off necrosis; Stents
Year: 2017 PMID: 29103188 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-017-0161-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol ISSN: 1092-8472