A D de Zwart1,2, F J P Beeres3, S J Rhemrev4, K Bartlema5, I B Schipper5. 1. Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. p.krijnen@lumc.nl. 2. Department of Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. p.krijnen@lumc.nl. 3. Deparment of Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6006, Lucerne, Switzerland. 4. Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Haaglanden, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The best diagnostic modality for confirmation of the diagnosis of a scaphoid fracture that is not visible on the initial radiograph (occult scaphoid fracture) is still subject of debate. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy (BS) for the diagnosis of these occult scaphoid fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a study period of 12 months, 33 consecutive patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture without a fracture on the scaphoid radiographs were evaluated with MRI, CT and BS. In case of a discrepancy between the diagnostic modalities, the final diagnosis was based on standardised follow-up with clinical examination and a repeated radiograph. RESULTS: Three of the 33 patients had a scaphoid fracture. MRI missed one scaphoid fracture and did not over-diagnose. CT missed two scaphoid fractures and did not over-diagnose. BS missed no scaphoid fractures and over-diagnosed one scaphoid fracture in a patient with a fracture of the trapezium. CONCLUSION: This study shows that neither MRI, nor CT and BS are 100 % accurate in diagnosing occult scaphoid fractures. MRI and CT miss fractures, and BS tends to over-diagnose. The specific advantages and limitations of each diagnostic modality should be familiar to the treating physicians and taken into consideration during the diagnostic process.
PURPOSE: The best diagnostic modality for confirmation of the diagnosis of a scaphoid fracture that is not visible on the initial radiograph (occult scaphoid fracture) is still subject of debate. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy (BS) for the diagnosis of these occult scaphoid fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a study period of 12 months, 33 consecutive patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture without a fracture on the scaphoid radiographs were evaluated with MRI, CT and BS. In case of a discrepancy between the diagnostic modalities, the final diagnosis was based on standardised follow-up with clinical examination and a repeated radiograph. RESULTS: Three of the 33 patients had a scaphoid fracture. MRI missed one scaphoid fracture and did not over-diagnose. CT missed two scaphoid fractures and did not over-diagnose. BS missed no scaphoid fractures and over-diagnosed one scaphoid fracture in a patient with a fracture of the trapezium. CONCLUSION: This study shows that neither MRI, nor CT and BS are 100 % accurate in diagnosing occult scaphoid fractures. MRI and CT miss fractures, and BS tends to over-diagnose. The specific advantages and limitations of each diagnostic modality should be familiar to the treating physicians and taken into consideration during the diagnostic process.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone scintigraphy; CT; MRI; Scaphoid fracture
Authors: Wouter Mallee; Job N Doornberg; David Ring; C Niek van Dijk; Mario Maas; J Carel Goslings Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: F J P Beeres; S J Rhemrev; P den Hollander; L M Kingma; S A G Meylaerts; S le Cessie; K A Bartlema; J F Hamming; M Hogervorst Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Br Date: 2008-09
Authors: Patrick Krastman; Nina M Mathijssen; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Gerald Kraan; Jos Runhaar Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Nils Hendrix; Ernst Scholten; Bastiaan Vernhout; Stefan Bruijnen; Bas Maresch; Mathijn de Jong; Suzanne Diepstraten; Stijn Bollen; Steven Schalekamp; Maarten de Rooij; Alexander Scholtens; Ward Hendrix; Tijs Samson; Lee-Ling Sharon Ong; Eric Postma; Bram van Ginneken; Matthieu Rutten Journal: Radiol Artif Intell Date: 2021-04-28
Authors: Sebastian Tschauner; Robert Marterer; Eszter Nagy; Georg Singer; Michael Riccabona; Erich Sorantin Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2020-06-14 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Abigael Cohen; Max Reijman; Gerald A Kraan; Nina M C Mathijssen; Marc A Koopmanschap; Jan A N Verhaar; Sander Mol; Joost W Colaris Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 2.692