Literature DB >> 34350413

Development and Validation of a Convolutional Neural Network for Automated Detection of Scaphoid Fractures on Conventional Radiographs.

Nils Hendrix1, Ernst Scholten1, Bastiaan Vernhout1, Stefan Bruijnen1, Bas Maresch1, Mathijn de Jong1, Suzanne Diepstraten1, Stijn Bollen1, Steven Schalekamp1, Maarten de Rooij1, Alexander Scholtens1, Ward Hendrix1, Tijs Samson1, Lee-Ling Sharon Ong1, Eric Postma1, Bram van Ginneken1, Matthieu Rutten1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) to that of 11 radiologists in detecting scaphoid bone fractures on conventional radiographs of the hand, wrist, and scaphoid.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: At two hospitals (hospitals A and B), three datasets consisting of conventional hand, wrist, and scaphoid radiographs were retrospectively retrieved: a dataset of 1039 radiographs (775 patients [mean age, 48 years ± 23 {standard deviation}; 505 female patients], period: 2017-2019, hospitals A and B) for developing a scaphoid segmentation CNN, a dataset of 3000 radiographs (1846 patients [mean age, 42 years ± 22; 937 female patients], period: 2003-2019, hospital B) for developing a scaphoid fracture detection CNN, and a dataset of 190 radiographs (190 patients [mean age, 43 years ± 20; 77 female patients], period: 2011-2020, hospital A) for testing the complete fracture detection system. Both CNNs were applied consecutively: The segmentation CNN localized the scaphoid and then passed the relevant region to the detection CNN for fracture detection. In an observer study, the performance of the system was compared with that of 11 radiologists. Evaluation metrics included the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS: The segmentation CNN achieved a DSC of 97.4% ± 1.4 with an HD of 1.31 mm ± 1.03. The detection CNN had sensitivity of 78% (95% CI: 70, 86), specificity of 84% (95% CI: 77, 92), PPV of 83% (95% CI: 77, 90), and AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.91). There was no difference between the AUC of the CNN and that of the radiologists (0.87 [95% CI: 0.81, 0.91] vs 0.83 [radiologist range: 0.79-0.85]; P = .09).
CONCLUSION: The developed CNN achieved radiologist-level performance in detecting scaphoid bone fractures on conventional radiographs of the hand, wrist, and scaphoid.Keywords: Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms, Feature Detection-Vision-Application Domain, Computer-Aided DiagnosisSee also the commentary by Li and Torriani in this issue.Supplemental material is available for this article.©RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-Aided Diagnosis; Convolutional Neural Network (CNN); Deep Learning Algorithms; Feature Detection-Vision-Application Domain; Machine Learning Algorithms

Year:  2021        PMID: 34350413      PMCID: PMC8329964          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  16 in total

1.  The presentation of scaphoid non-union.

Authors:  G H Prosser; E S Isbister
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Generalized Roe and Metz receiver operating characteristic model: analytic link between simulated decision scores and empirical AUC variances and covariances.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-09-25

3.  Diagnosis and treatment of scaphoid fractures, can non-union be prevented?

Authors:  W Roolker; M Maas; A H Broekhuizen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Incorporating Cone-Beam CT Into the Diagnostic Algorithm for Suspected Radiocarpal Fractures: A New Standard of Care?

Authors:  Brian Gibney; Michelle Smith; Adrian Moughty; Eoin C Kavanagh; Darragh Hynes; Peter J MacMahon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Current methods of diagnosis and treatment of scaphoid fractures.

Authors:  Steven J Rhemrev; Daan Ootes; Frank Jp Beeres; Sven Ag Meylaerts; Inger B Schipper
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-02-04

Review 6.  Scaphoid fractures and nonunions: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Scott P Steinmann; Julie E Adams
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  The suspected scaphoid injury: resource implications in the absence of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M J Burns; S A Aitken; D McRae; A D Duckworth; A Gray
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.729

8.  MDCT and radiography of wrist fractures: radiographic sensitivity and fracture patterns.

Authors:  Rodney D Welling; Jon A Jacobson; David A Jamadar; Suzanne Chong; Elaine M Caoili; Peter J L Jebson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Multi-reader ROC studies with split-plot designs: a comparison of statistical methods.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski; Brandon D Gallas; Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  On resection of the proximal carpal row.

Authors:  R J Neviaser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy and potential covariates of artificial intelligence for diagnosing orthopedic fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Yi Yang; Yi-Wei Shen; Ke-Rui Zhang; Ze-Kun Jiang; Li-Tai Ma; Chen Ding; Bei-Yu Wang; Yang Meng; Hao Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 7.034

2.  Automatic Segmentation for Favourable Delineation of Ten Wrist Bones on Wrist Radiographs Using Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Bo-Kyeong Kang; Yelin Han; Jaehoon Oh; Jongwoo Lim; Jongbin Ryu; Myeong Seong Yoon; Juncheol Lee; Soorack Ryu
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-11

3.  Scaphoid Fracture Detection by Using Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Tai-Hua Yang; Ming-Huwi Horng; Rong-Shiang Li; Yung-Nien Sun
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.