| Literature DB >> 26555708 |
S A Abdulhaqq1, C Zorrilla2, G Kang3, X Yin1, V Tamayo2, K E Seaton4, J Joseph1, S Garced2, G D Tomaras4, K A Linn5, A S Foulkes6, L Azzoni1, M VerMilyea7, C Coutifaris7, A V Kossenkov1, L Showe1, E N Kraiselburd8, Q Li3, L J Montaner1.
Abstract
Sex workers practicing in high HIV endemic areas have been extensively targeted to test anti-HIV prophylactic strategies. We hypothesize that in women with high levels of genital exposure to semen changes in cervico-vaginal mucosal and/or systemic immune activation will contribute to a decreased susceptibility to HIV-1 infection. To address this question, we assessed sexual activity and immune activation status (in peripheral blood), as well as cellular infiltrates and gene expression in ectocervical mucosa biopsies in female sex workers (FSWs; n=50), as compared with control women (CG; n=32). FSWs had low-to-absent HIV-1-specific immune responses with significantly lower CD38 expression on circulating CD4(+) or CD8(+) T-cells (both: P<0.001) together with lower cervical gene expression of genes associated with leukocyte homing and chemotaxis. FSWs also had increased levels of interferon-ɛ (IFNɛ) gene and protein expression in the cervical epithelium together with reduced expression of genes associated with HIV-1 integration and replication. A correlative relationship between semen exposure and elevated type-1 IFN expression in FSWs was also established. Overall, our data suggest that long-term condomless sex work can result in multiple changes within the cervico-vaginal compartment that would contribute to sustaining a lower susceptibility for HIV-1 infection in the absence of HIV-specific responses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26555708 PMCID: PMC4864149 DOI: 10.1038/mi.2015.116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mucosal Immunol ISSN: 1933-0219 Impact factor: 7.313
Sexual Practices and Cervico-vaginal Status Amongst Biopsy Contributors
| Category | Control Group (CG) 35 Women | (FSW) 50 women | P-Values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35.5 (29.5 – 41.25) | 32 (28 – 38) | |||
| 1 (1 – 1) | 6 (15 – 4) | |||
| 0 (0 – 3) | 3 (2 – 9.7) | |||
| (N/A) | 8.45 (5 – 11.5)ţ | |||
| 16 (45.7%) | 2 (4.0%) | |||
| 4 (17.1%) | 27 (54%) | |||
| 4 (12.9%) | 34 (68%) | |||
| 0 (0%) | 8 (16.0%) | |||
| 5 (17.2%) | 6 (20.5%) | 0.879 | ||
| 6 (24.0%) | 14 (28.0%) | 0.406 | ||
| 21 (61.7%) | 34 (75.6%) | 0.2219 | ||
| 56.65 (20.0 – 158.5) | 76.9 (20.0 – 89.75) | 0.2097 |
Parenthetical data presented as range or as percentage.
Indicates significant variable as measured by Mann-Whitney U or Fisher’s Exact Testing
Sterilization was done by tubal ligation
STIs were asymptomatic, symptomatic STIs were apart of the exclusion criteria
For Estradiol: 28 FSW/14 CG measured
Selected Significant Variables from Flow Cytometric Analysis of PBMC
| Categories | Variables | Control Group | FSW | P-value | BY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-Cell Activation | CD38 MFI on CD4+ T-Cells | 201.9 (126 – 238) | 84.4 (52.4 – 116) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| %CD38 CD4+ T-Cells | 53.67 (46.2 – 64.2) | 40.3 (33.7 – 47.1) | <0.0001 | 0.0006 | |
| CD38 MFI on CD8+ T-Cells | 101.2 (64.9 – 178) | 55.9 (32.3 – 72.1) | <0.0001 | 0.0006 | |
| %CD38 CD8+ T-Cells | 41.95 (34.8 – 50.9) | 32.21 (23.9 – 40.0) | 0.0029 | 0.021 | |
|
| |||||
| CD4 T-Regulatory Cells | %FoxP3+ CD25+ CD4+ T-Cells | 1.27 (0.76 – 1.69) | 0.87 (0.46 – 1.15) | 0.019 | 0.019 |
|
| |||||
| Dendritic Cells | %mDC | 0.219 (0.18 – 0.25) | 0.17 (0.11 – 0.21) | 0.0022 | 0.022 |
| CD83 MFI on mDC | 67.7 (28.0 – 72.0) | 94.4 (59.4 – 127) | 0.0030 | 0.022 | |
Variables listed in order of p-value. Median and IQR values shown. Group comparisons done by Mann-Whitney U tests.
Benjamini & Yekutieli adjustment (at rate of 10%) was done per examined immune cell compartment or functional test
Figure 1Increased levels of immune effectors in FSW ectocervical tissue as compared to control women. Pictured are IHC images from each staining group representative of Control or Sex Worker groups, brown punctate staining represents individually stained cells. (A–C) FSWs had over 2× more CD4+ T-Cells within ectocervical biopsies as compared to biopsies from low-risk controls (median: FSW 1958 vs CG 609.3 cells/mm2; p=0.0400). (D–F) CD68+ macrophages were also over-represented in FSWs with the highest differential between FSWs and control group women (median: FSW 829.6 vs CG 294.0 cells/mm2; p=0.0384) (G–I) FSWs had higher levels of CD123+ pDC within ectocervical tissue as compared to controls (median: FSW 461.1 vs CG 219.8 cells/mm2; p=0.0127). Images at 10x. Median and Interquartile range shown in C, F & I. Groups comparison was done by Mann-Whitney U tests.
Figure 2Gene expression differences in ectocervical biopsies between 11 females from control group (CG) and 14 female sex workers (FSW). (A) Principle component analysis using all 873 significant genes (1.2≥Fold) demonstrates clear segregation of sex workers from control group samples. (B) Of 873 genes, 106 overlapped with a predetermined Ingenuity Pathway Analysis list of genes involved with viral infection. 33 of the 106 genes differentially regulated between FSW and CG had an expression profile in FSW predicted to reduce susceptibility to viral infection as compare to CG. (C) Conversely, 60 of the 106 genes had an expression profile predicted to increase susceptibility to viral infection FSW as compared to CG. Overall, IPA predicted higher viral susceptibility in FSW as compared to CG (Z-score = +3.35).
Biological Functions significantly altered based on genes differentially expressed between FSW and Control Group Women.
| Diseases or Functions Annotation | P-Value | Predicted Activation State | Z-Score | Genes in Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemotaxis of Granulocytes | 0.0074200 | Decreased | −2.22 | 15 |
| Chemotaxis of Leukocytes | 0.0002850 | Decreased | −2.38 | 29 |
| Chemotaxis of Myeloid Cells | 0.0011300 | Decreased | −2.75 | 23 |
| Chemotaxis of Neutrophils | 0.0033000 | Decreased | −2.03 | 14 |
| Chemotaxis of Phagocytes | 0.0007740 | Decreased | −2.93 | 24 |
| Engulfment of Antigen Presenting Cells | 0.0062300 | Decreased | −2.20 | 10 |
| Engulfment of Phagocytes | 0.0101000 | Decreased | −2.41 | 11 |
| Homing of Granulocytes | 0.0032700 | Decreased | −2.22 | 16 |
| Homing of Leukocytes | 0.0003570 | Decreased | −2.38 | 30 |
| Homing of Neutrophils | 0.0012900 | Decreased | −2.03 | 15 |
| Organismal Death | 0.0011900 | Decreased | −3.93 | 98 |
| Phagocytosis by Macrophages | 0.0043000 | Decreased | −2.20 | 9 |
| Phagocytosis of Blood Cells | 0.0125000 | Decreased | −2.07 | 11 |
| Phagocytosis of Myeloid Cells | 0.0096900 | Decreased | −2.41 | 10 |
| Phagocytosis of Phagocytes | 0.0096900 | Decreased | −2.41 | 10 |
| Apoptosis of Breast Cancer Cell Lines | 0.0029400 | Increased | 2.43 | 21 |
| Cell Death of Breast Cancer Cell Lines | 0.0018800 | Increased | 2.82 | 24 |
| Cell movement of Endothelial Cells | 0.0123000 | Increased | 2.17 | 22 |
| Cell Movement of Fibroblast Cell Lines | 0.0113000 | Increased | 2.33 | 12 |
| Cell Viability of Cervical Cancer Cell Lines | 0.0029600 | Increased | 2.07 | 17 |
| Interphase of Fibroblasts | 0.0042900 | Increased | 2.22 | 8 |
| Replication of RNA Virus | 0.0001860 | Increased | 2.41 | 40 |
| Replication of Virus | 0.0002020 | Increased | 2.67 | 43 |
| Survival of Organism | 0.0104000 | Increased | 2.61 | 41 |
| Viral Infection | 0.0004060 | Increased | 3.35 | 106 |
Activation state indicates direction of change in FSW compared to control group with the significance of the prediction expressed as Z-score
Figure 3Increased IFNε in FSW-derived ectocervical tissue as compared to samples from women in the control (A) Interferon ε staining (brown) showed that expression of this Type I interferon was tightly restricted to basal and parabasal stratified squamous epithelium. Staining was also evident in columnar cells but to a much lesser extent (data not shown). Female Sex Workers (FSW - bottom) had much higher expression of IFNε than controls (Top) in general. Both gene expression array analysis [Right panels are gradient maps to highlight positive staining within the epithelium] (B) (p=0.0144) and Image quantification (C) (p=0.0336) of tissues showed higher expression of IFNε in FSWs. (D) Protein expression for IFNε strongly correlated with the gene expression array (r=0.6954 p=0.0019) showing that FSWs had higher IFNε expression. (E) Splitting all women in the study based on previous unprotected sex in the week prior to biopsy showed that women who had unprotected sex had 3× more IFNε than those who did not (p=0.001). Median and Interquartile range shown for panels A, B & E. The difference between groups was tested using Mann-Whitney tests. Correlations were assessed using the spearman test
Figure 4Heatmap of Dowregulated Genes from FSW/CG Microarray Shown Previously to be Essential for HIV-1 Infection and Replication. As multiple studies have examined required genes for HIV-1 infection/replication, we assessed our data set for overlap with four previously published gene sets [33–36]. 22 genes from our data set overlapped with results from these prior studies (hypergeometrical test: p<0.0001) this was more than twice the number of genes as expected from random overlap. Additionally, being present in at least 2 of these prior studies further validated 4 of these genes. Heatmap is presented as fold difference over median expression across all patients for a particular gene. HIV Sets are color coded as green for overlap with a particular data set and white for no overlap.
Genes from Sex Worker Ectocervical Biopsy Microarray which Overlap with Genes Required for HIV infection
| Gene Names | Fold | P-Value | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zinc Finger Protein 831 (ZNF831) | −2.25 | 0.00026 | 6.0% |
| C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) | −2.02 | 0.00370 | 17.6% |
| Lysosomal-associated protein transmembrane 5 (LAPTM5) | −1.91 | 0.00006 | 0.0% |
| T-cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 2 (TIAM2) | −1.85 | 0.00406 | 17.6% |
| Nucleoporin 153kDa (NUP153) | −1.67 | 0.00251 | 15.5% |
| Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F (HNRPF) | −1.66 | 0.00070 | 10.2% |
| Cluster of differentiation 4 | −1.55 | 0.00054 | 8.2% |
| SP110 nuclear body protein (SP110) | −1.49 | 0.00220 | 15.5% |
| Janus Kinase 1 (JAK1) | −1.48 | 0.00127 | 10.8% |
| Four-phosphate-adaptor protein 1 (FAPP1) | −1.37 | 0.00111 | 10.8% |
| Trafficking protein particle complex (TRAPPC1) | −1.11 | 0.00407 | 17.6% |
| THO complex subunit 2 (THOC2) | 1.25 | 0.00168 | 10.2% |
| M-phase phosphoprotein 6 (MPHOSPH6) | 1.32 | 0.00529 | 13.0% |
| Farnesyltransferase (FNTA) | 1.36 | 0.00484 | 13.0% |
| Carboxy-terminal domain, RNA polymerase II, polypeptide A, phosphatase, subunit 1 (CTDP1) | 1.39 | 0.00816 | 15.5% |
| Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor-associated protein-like 2 (GABARAPL2) | 1.46 | 0.00222 | 10.8% |
| HIV-1 Tat specific factor 1 (HTATSF1) | 1.48 | 0.00272 | 10.8% |
| Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) | 1.72 | 0.00099 | 8.2% |
| Huntingtin-interacting protein 1-related protein (HIP1R) | 1.96 | 0.01007 | 15.5% |