Catherine Hudon1, Maud-Christine Chouinard2, Fatoumata Diadiou3, Mireille Lambert3, Danielle Bouliane3. 1. Département de médecine de famille et médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada catherine.hudon@usherbrooke.ca. 2. Centre de santé et de services sociaux de Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada Département des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada. 3. Centre de santé et de services sociaux de Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although case management (CM) is increasingly being implemented to address the complex needs of vulnerable clienteles, few studies have examined the patient experience of CM. This study aimed to examine the experience of patients and their family members with care integration as part of a primary care CM intervention. Patients in the study were frequent users of health care services who had chronic diseases. METHODS: A descriptive, qualitative approach was conducted involving 25 patients and 8 of their family members. Data were collected through in-depth interviews of the patients and 2 focus groups of family members and were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: While some participants did not fully understand the CM intervention and a few believed that it involved too many appointments, the CM nurses were patients' preferred contact with primary care. The nurses actively involved the patients in developing and carrying out their individualized services plans (ISPs) with other health care partners. Patients felt that their needs were taken into consideration, especially regarding access to the health care system. The case manager facilitated access to information as well as communication and coordination among health care and community partners. This improved communication comforted the patients and nurtured a relationship of trust. Participants were actively involved in decision-making. Their ISPs helped them know where they were going and improved transitions between services. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of patients and family members was overall very positive regarding care integration. They reported improved access, communication, coordination, and involvement in decision-making as well as better health care transitions.
PURPOSE: Although case management (CM) is increasingly being implemented to address the complex needs of vulnerable clienteles, few studies have examined the patient experience of CM. This study aimed to examine the experience of patients and their family members with care integration as part of a primary care CM intervention. Patients in the study were frequent users of health care services who had chronic diseases. METHODS: A descriptive, qualitative approach was conducted involving 25 patients and 8 of their family members. Data were collected through in-depth interviews of the patients and 2 focus groups of family members and were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: While some participants did not fully understand the CM intervention and a few believed that it involved too many appointments, the CM nurses were patients' preferred contact with primary care. The nurses actively involved the patients in developing and carrying out their individualized services plans (ISPs) with other health care partners. Patients felt that their needs were taken into consideration, especially regarding access to the health care system. The case manager facilitated access to information as well as communication and coordination among health care and community partners. This improved communication comforted the patients and nurtured a relationship of trust. Participants were actively involved in decision-making. Their ISPs helped them know where they were going and improved transitions between services. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of patients and family members was overall very positive regarding care integration. They reported improved access, communication, coordination, and involvement in decision-making as well as better health care transitions.
Authors: Siobhan Reilly; Jessica Abell; Christian Brand; Jane Hughes; Kathryn Berzins; David Challis Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 1.458
Authors: Erin Fries Taylor; Rachel M Machta; David S Meyers; Janice Genevro; Deborah N Peikes Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Dyfed W Huws; Deborah Cashmore; Robert G Newcombe; Catherine Roberts; Judith Vincent; Glyn Elwyn Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-05-29 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Natalie B Connell; Pallavi Prathivadi; Karl A Lorenz; Sophia N Zupanc; Sara J Singer; Erin E Krebs; Elizabeth M Yano; Hong-Nei Wong; Karleen F Giannitrapani Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Catherine Hudon; Maud-Christine Chouinard; Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Nazeem Muhajarine; Fred Burge; Paula Louise Bush; Alya Danish; Vivian R Ramsden; France Légaré; Line Guénette; Paul Morin; Mireille Lambert; Fiona Fick; Olivia Cleary; Véronique Sabourin; Mike Warren; Pierre Pluye Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Catherine Hudon; Maud-Christine Chouinard; Pierre Pluye; Reem El Sherif; Paula Louise Bush; Benoît Rihoux; Marie-Eve Poitras; Mireille Lambert; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; France Légaré Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Victoria L Mayer; David Siscovick; Crispin Goytia; Daphne Brown; Emily Hanlen; James Flory; M Diane McKee; Carol R Horowitz Journal: Med Care Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 2.983