Avishag Laish-Farkash1,2, Amos Katz3,4, Ornit Cohen3,4, Azriel Osherov3,4, Sharon Bruocha3,4, Vladimir Khalameizer3,4. 1. Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Barzilai Medical Center, 2 Hahistadrut Street, Ashkelon, 78306, Israel. avishagl@inter.net.il. 2. Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. avishagl@inter.net.il. 3. Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Barzilai Medical Center, 2 Hahistadrut Street, Ashkelon, 78306, Israel. 4. Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Previous data showed that pain sensation was common during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using an 8-mm radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter. Pain was more common in the left pulmonary veins (PVs). We characterized the location of pain during PVI using circular multi-electrode ablation catheters. METHODS: Included are all consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent PVI using the phased RF PVAC® catheter (Medtronic) or the irrigated nMARQ™ catheter (Biosense Webster) under conscious sedation between July 2011 and March 2015. Site of pain reaction was marked for each patient. RESULTS: A total of 251 patients (141 PVAC®, 110 nMARQ™) were studied; 214 (85 %) had at least one lesion associated with pain. Gender (r = 0.084, p = 0.186), type of AF (r = 0.048, p = 0.452), age (r = 0.078, p = 0.216), and repeat procedure (r = 0.018, p = 0.78) were not correlated with pain. There was no association between site of pain and catheter type; only 33% of the painful PVs were also the largest ones (p = 0.5, kappa = 0.03, R = -0.083). One-year freedom from AF was similar for patients with and without painful PVs (p = 0.6). The distribution of pain was as follows: 126 (59%) left superior PV (LSPV), 28 (13%) left inferior, 28 (13%) all PVs, 12 (5.6%) right superior, 12 (5.6%) right inferior, 18 (8.4%) left common, and 2 (0.9%) right common PV. CONCLUSIONS: PVI using multi-electrode catheters more commonly caused pain sensation in LSPV. There was no influence of catheter type or PV size on pain localization. Our findings, which are similar to those using an 8-mm ablation catheter, imply that location of pain is not catheter dependent but rather a reflection of autonomic physiology.
PURPOSE: Previous data showed that pain sensation was common during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using an 8-mm radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter. Pain was more common in the left pulmonary veins (PVs). We characterized the location of pain during PVI using circular multi-electrode ablation catheters. METHODS: Included are all consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent PVI using the phased RF PVAC® catheter (Medtronic) or the irrigated nMARQ™ catheter (Biosense Webster) under conscious sedation between July 2011 and March 2015. Site of pain reaction was marked for each patient. RESULTS: A total of 251 patients (141 PVAC®, 110 nMARQ™) were studied; 214 (85 %) had at least one lesion associated with pain. Gender (r = 0.084, p = 0.186), type of AF (r = 0.048, p = 0.452), age (r = 0.078, p = 0.216), and repeat procedure (r = 0.018, p = 0.78) were not correlated with pain. There was no association between site of pain and catheter type; only 33% of the painful PVs were also the largest ones (p = 0.5, kappa = 0.03, R = -0.083). One-year freedom from AF was similar for patients with and without painful PVs (p = 0.6). The distribution of pain was as follows: 126 (59%) left superior PV (LSPV), 28 (13%) left inferior, 28 (13%) all PVs, 12 (5.6%) right superior, 12 (5.6%) right inferior, 18 (8.4%) left common, and 2 (0.9%) right common PV. CONCLUSIONS: PVI using multi-electrode catheters more commonly caused pain sensation in LSPV. There was no influence of catheter type or PV size on pain localization. Our findings, which are similar to those using an 8-mm ablation catheter, imply that location of pain is not catheter dependent but rather a reflection of autonomic physiology.
Authors: Luigi Di Biase; Sergio Conti; Prasant Mohanty; Rong Bai; Javier Sanchez; David Walton; Annie John; Pasquale Santangeli; Claude S Elayi; Salwa Beheiry; G Joseph Gallinghouse; Sanghamitra Mohanty; Rodney Horton; Shane Bailey; J David Burkhardt; Andrea Natale Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: H Breivik; P C Borchgrevink; S M Allen; L A Rosseland; L Romundstad; E K Breivik Hals; G Kvarstein; A Stubhaug Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2008-05-16 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Douglas L Packer; Robert C Kowal; Kevin R Wheelan; James M Irwin; Jean Champagne; Peter G Guerra; Marc Dubuc; Vivek Reddy; Linda Nelson; Richard G Holcomb; John W Lehmann; Jeremy N Ruskin Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 24.094