Literature DB >> 26552785

Exhausted implanted pulse generator in sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: What next in daily practice for patients?

Emilie Duchalais1, Guillaume Meurette2, Bastien Perrot3, Vincent Wyart2, Caroline Kubis2, Paul-Antoine Lehur2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence relies on an implanted pulse generator known to have a limited lifespan. The long-term use of sacral nerve stimulation raises concerns about the true lifespan of generators. The aim of the study was to assess the lifespan of sacral nerve stimulation implanted pulse generators in daily practice, and the outcome of exhausted generator replacement, in faecal incontinent patients.
METHODS: Faecal incontinent patients with pulse generators (Medtronic Interstim™ or InterstimII™) implanted in a single centre from 2001 to 2014 were prospectively followed up. Generator lifespan was measured according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients with a generator explanted/turned off before exhaustion were excluded. Morbidity of exhausted generator replacement and the outcome (Cleveland Clinic Florida Faecal Incontinence (CCF-FI) and Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) scores) were recorded.
RESULTS: Of 135 patients with an implanted pulse generator, 112 (InterstimII 66) were included. Mean follow-up was 4.9 ± 2.8 years. The generator reached exhaustion in 29 (26%) cases. Overall median lifespan of an implanted pulse generator was approximately 9 years (95% CI 8-9.2). Interstim and InterstimII 25th percentile lifespan was 7.2 (CI 6.4-8.3) and 5 (CI 4-not reached) years, respectively. After exhaustion, generators were replaced, left in place or explanted in 23, 2 and 4 patients, respectively. Generator replacement was virtually uneventful. CCF-FI/FIQL scores remained unchanged after generator replacement (CCF-FI 8 ± 2 vs 7 ± 3; FIQL 3 ± 0.6 vs 3 ± 0.5; p = ns).
CONCLUSION: In this study, the implanted pulse generator observed median lifespan was 9 years. After exhaustion, generators were safely and efficiently replaced. The study also gives insight into long-term needs and costs of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Battery exhaustion; Faecal incontinence; Implanted pulse generator; Outcome; Sacral nerve stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26552785     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2433-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  21 in total

1.  Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Sacral neuromodulation: long-term outcome and quality of life in patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  O Uludağ; J Melenhorst; S M P Koch; W G van Gemert; C H C Dejong; C G M I Baeten
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Long-term outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence.

Authors:  D F Altomare; S Giuratrabocchetta; C H Knowles; A Muñoz Duyos; J Robert-Yap; K E Matzel
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Resource implications of running a sacral neuromodulation service: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  C M McMullin; A M Jadav; C Hanwell; S R Brown
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Outcome and cost analysis of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence.

Authors:  F H Hetzer; A Bieler; D Hahnloser; F Löhlein; P-A Clavien; N Demartines
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  K E Matzel; U Stadelmaier; M Hohenfellner; F P Gall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-10-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Joe J Tjandra; Miranda K Y Chan; Chung Hung Yeh; Carolyn Murray-Green
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 9.  Sacral neuromodulation with implanted devices for urinary storage and voiding dysfunction in adults.

Authors:  G Peter Herbison; Edwin P Arnold
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

10.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in the UK.

Authors:  M E D Jarrett; J S Varma; G S Duthie; R J Nicholls; M A Kamm
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  Success and Complication Rates After Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: A Single-center Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Bernhard Widmann; Christian Galata; Rene Warschkow; Ulrich Beutner; Önder Ögredici; Franc H Hetzer; Bruno M Schmied; Stefan Post; Lukas Marti
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.924

Review 2.  Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence-Recommendations for Day-to-Day Practice.

Authors:  Paul A Lehur; Michael Sørensen; Thomas C Dudding; Charles H Knowles; Stefan de Wachter; Stefan Engelberg; Klaus E Matzel
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-03-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.