Literature DB >> 26552652

The centroid paradigm: Quantifying feature-based attention in terms of attention filters.

Peng Sun1,2, Charles Chubb3, Charles E Wright4, George Sperling5.   

Abstract

This paper elaborates a recent conceptualization of feature-based attention in terms of attention filters (Drew et al., Journal of Vision, 10(10:20), 1-16, 2010) into a general purpose centroid-estimation paradigm for studying feature-based attention. An attention filter is a brain process, initiated by a participant in the context of a task requiring feature-based attention, which operates broadly across space to modulate the relative effectiveness with which different features in the retinal input influence performance. This paper describes an empirical method for quantitatively measuring attention filters. The method uses a "statistical summary representation" (SSR) task in which the participant strives to mouse-click the centroid of a briefly flashed cloud composed of items of different types (e.g., dots of different luminances or sizes), weighting some types of items more strongly than others. In different attention conditions, the target weights for different item types in the centroid task are varied. The actual weights exerted on the participant's responses by different item types in any given attention condition are derived by simple linear regression. Because, on each trial, the centroid paradigm obtains information about the relative effectiveness of all the features in the display, both target and distractor features, and because the participant's response is a continuous variable in each of two dimensions (versus a simple binary choice as in most previous paradigms), it is remarkably powerful. The number of trials required to estimate an attention filter is an order of magnitude fewer than the number required to investigate much simpler concepts in typical psychophysical attention paradigms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention filter; Centroid estimation; Feature-based attention; Methodology; Selective attention; Statistical summary representations (SSRs)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26552652     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0978-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  8 in total

1.  Central tendency representation and exemplar matching in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Chad Dubé
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

2.  High-capacity preconscious processing in concurrent groupings of colored dots.

Authors:  Peng Sun; Charles Chubb; Charles E Wright; George Sperling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The features that control discrimination of an isodipole texture pair.

Authors:  Kier Groulx; Charles Chubb; Jonathan D Victor; Mary M Conte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Decision making on spatially continuous scales.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Human attention filters for single colors.

Authors:  Peng Sun; Charles Chubb; Charles E Wright; George Sperling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  What is a preattentive feature?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Igor S Utochkin
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-11-13

7.  The anisotropic field of ensemble coding.

Authors:  David Pascucci; Nadia Ruethemann; Gijs Plomp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A direct comparison of central tendency recall and temporal integration in the successive field iconic memory task.

Authors:  Jacob Zepp; Chad Dubé; David Melcher
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.