| Literature DB >> 26552456 |
Hong Euy Lim1, Jin Oh Na1, Sung Il Im1, Cheol Ung Choi1, Seong Hwan Kim2, Jin Won Kim1, Eung Ju Kim1, Seong Woo Han3, Seung-Woon Rha1, Chang Gyu Park1, Hong Seog Seo1, Dong Joo Oh1, Chun Hwang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: There have been reports that interatrial septal (IAS) thickness is increased in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was performed to investigate whether IAS thickness determined by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) represents the amount of left atrium (LA) structural and functional remodeling.Entities:
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Atrial remodeling; Atrial septum; Heart atria
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26552456 PMCID: PMC4642010 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2015.30.6.808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Intern Med ISSN: 1226-3303 Impact factor: 2.884
Figure 1.(A, B) Representative images of interatrial septal (IAS) thickness measurement by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT). The IAS thickness measured by TTE showed good correlations with (C) integrated backscatter (IBS) reflectivity of the IAS and (D) IAS thickness measured by MSCT.
Baseline characteristics, echocardiographic measurements, and mean voltage of the left atrium
| Variable | Overall (n = 104) | PAF (n = 82) | PeAF (n = 22) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, yr | 53.5 ± 12.1 | 54.3 ± 11.7 | 50.6 ± 13.5 | 0.252 |
| Sex, male:female | 79:25 | 61:21 | 18:4 | 0.469 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 24.6 ± 2.7 | 24.8 ± 2.76 | 24.1 ± 2.50 | 0.306 |
| Diabetes | 11 (10.6) | 8 (9.8) | 3 (13.6) | 0.599 |
| Hypertension | 42 (40.4) | 33 (40.2) | 9 (40.9) | 0.955 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 129.2 ± 16.8 | 129.5 ± 16.8 | 128.1 ± 17.1 | 0.741 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 75.6 ± 10.2 | 76.0 ± 9.9 | 74.0 ± 11.1 | 0.445 |
| Heart rate, beat/min | 65.9 ± 11.9 | 66.4 ± 11.0 | 64.3 ± 15.0 | 0.541 |
| C-reactive protein, mg/dL | 2.05 ± 3.69 | 1.79 ± 2.85 | 2.90 ± 5.65 | 0.447 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 173.5 ± 32.8 | 175.3 ± 33.8 | 167.0 ± 28.7 | 0.252 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | 108 (73–159) | 116 (72–161) | 103 (75–136) | 0.566 |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 47.1 ± 10.9 | 47.1 ± 10.9 | 47.1 ± 11.0 | 0.985 |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 109.1 ± 28.4 | 111.1 ± 29.1 | 102.0 ± 25.0 | 0.156 |
| CHADS2 score | 0.71 ± 0.89 | 0.68 ± 0.89 | 0.82 ± 0.91 | 0.469 |
| CHA2DS2-VASc score | 1.16 ± 1.12 | 1.16 ± 1.09 | 1.18 ± 1.26 | 0.901 |
| Echocardiography | ||||
| LVEF, % | 65.4 ± 7.7 | 65.8 ± 6.7 | 63.7 ± 10.8 | 0.376 |
| LA dimension, mm | 40.4 ± 5.8 | 40.2 ± 5.8 | 41.3 ± 6.0 | 0.452 |
| LAVmax, mL | 69.1 ± 19.6 | 66.8 ± 18.4 | 77.8 ± 21.8 | 0.039 |
| LAVOAE, mL | 51.8 ± 18.2 | 50.2 ± 17.5 | 57.5 ± 20.0 | 0.135 |
| LAVmin, mL | 38.7 ± 15.3 | 37.2 ± 14.8 | 44.4 ± 16.0 | 0.064 |
| LAEFtotal, % | 44.7 ± 9.7 | 45.1 ± 9.3 | 43.4 ± 11.0 | 0.530 |
| LAEFpassive, % | 26.0 ± 10.0 | 25.7 ± 10.4 | 26.9 ± 8.9 | 0.617 |
| LAEFactive, % | 26.0 ± 9.1 | 26.4 ± 9.5 | 24.6 ± 7.5 | 0.355 |
| IAS thickness, mm | 11.26 ± 2.02 | 11.07 ± 1.93 | 11.95 ± 2.21 | 0.068 |
| Mean LAVOL, mV | 2.34 ± 1.05 | 2.45 ± 1.08 | 1.95 ± 0.84 | 0.024 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD, number (%), or median (interquartile range).
PAF, paroxysmal atrial f ibrillation; PeAF, persistent atrial f ibrillation; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LA, left atrium; LAVmax, maximal left atrial volume; LAVOAE, left atrial volume at the onset of atrial emptying; LAVmin, minimal left atrial volume; LAEFtotal, total left atrial emptying fraction; LAEFpassive, passive left atrial emptying fraction; LAEFactive, active left atrial emptying fraction; IAS, interatrial septum; LAVOL, left atrial voltage.
p value between paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation groups.
Figure 2.Relationships between interatrial septal (IAS) thickness and left atrial (LA) structural and functional parameters. (A) Linear regression between IAS thickness and mean LA voltage. (B) Linear regression between IAS thickness and maximal LAV (LAVmax). (C) Linear regression between IAS thickness and total left atrial emptying fraction (LAEFtotal). (D) Linear regression between IAS thickness and active LAEF (LAEFactive).
Figure 3.Mean left atrial voltage (LAVOL) and interatrial septal (IAS) thickness according to CHADS2 score and CHA2DS2-VASc score. (A, C) There were no statistically significant differences in mean LAVOL or IAS thickness according to CHADS2 score. (B, D) However, mean LAVOL was significantly lower and IAS thickness was significantly higher in high-risk CHA2DS2-VASc level (≥ 2).
Binary logistic regression analysis: variables influencing arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation for AF
| Variable | AF recurrence | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No (n = 81) | Yes (n = 23) | |||
| Age, yr | 52.7 ± 12.3 | 56.3 ± 11.2 | 0.191 | |
| Female sex | 16 (19.8) | 9 (39.1) | 0.055 | |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 24.6 ± 2.9 | 24.6 ± 1.9 | 0.862 | |
| Persistent atrial fibrillation | 16 (19.8) | 6 (26.1) | 0.512 | |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 125.7 ± 16.7 | 127.4 ± 16.0 | 0.837 | |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 75.7 ± 10.6 | 75.3 ± 9.0 | 0.848 | |
| CHADS2 score | 0.64 ± 0.87 | 0.96 ± 0.93 | 0.155 | |
| CHA2DS2-VASc score | 1.05 ± 1.11 | 1.57 ± 1.12 | 0.059 | |
| Echocardiography | ||||
| LVEF, % | 65.5 ± 8.0 | 65.0 ± 6.9 | 0.756 | |
| LA dimension, mm | 40.0 ± 5.5 | 41.9 ± 6.7 | 0.217 | |
| LAVmax, mL | 66.0 ± 17.4 | 80.4 ± 22.9 | 0.009 | |
| LAVOAE, mL | 48.8 ± 16.1 | 61.8 ± 21.7 | 0.010 | |
| LAVmin, mL | 35.5 ± 11.8 | 50.0 ± 20.5 | 0.002 | |
| LAEFtotal, % | 46.4 ± 9.0 | 38.7 ± 9.8 | 0.002 | |
| LAEFpassive, % | 26.7 ± 10.2 | 23.4 ± 9.3 | 0.159 | |
| LAEFactive, % | 27.5 ± 8.8 | 21.0 ± 8.8 | 0.005 | 0.028 |
| IAS thickness, mm | 11.0 ± 1.9 | 12.3 ± 2.2 | 0.014 | |
| Mean LAVOL, mV | 2.55 ± 1.03 | 1.62 ± 0.79 | < 0.001 | 0.011 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD or number (%).
AF, atrial fibrillation; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LA, left atrium; LAVmax, maximal left atrial volume; LAVOAE, left atrial volume at the onset of atrial emptying; LAVmin, minimal left atrial volume; LAEFtotal, total left atrial emptying fraction; LAEFpassive, passive left atrial emptying fraction; LAEFactive, active left atrial emptying fraction; IAS, interatrial septum; LAVOL, left atrial voltage.
Figure 4.Receiver operator characteristic curves for (A) mean left atrial (LA) voltage and (B) active left atrial emptying fraction (LAEFactive) were used to distinguish subjects who are prone to recurrence of arrhythmia after atrial fibrillation ablation. AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 5.(A-D) Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of interatrial septal (IAS) thickness on transthoracic echocardiography. The Bland-Altman plot shows the excellent reproducibility of IAS thickness measurement between investigators.