Literature DB >> 26551163

Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Nihar R Desai1, Steven M Bradley2, Craig S Parzynski3, Brahmajee K Nallamothu4, Paul S Chan5, John A Spertus5, Manesh R Patel6, Jeremy Ader7, Aaron Soufer8, Harlan M Krumholz1, Jeptha P Curtis1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization were developed to critically evaluate and improve patient selection for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). National trends in the appropriateness of PCI have not been examined.
OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in PCI utilization, patient selection, and procedural appropriateness following the introduction of Appropriate Use Criteria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, longitudinal, cross-sectional analysis of patients undergoing PCI between July 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014, at hospitals continuously participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI registry over the study period. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportion of nonacute PCIs classified as inappropriate at the patient and hospital level using the 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization.
RESULTS: A total of 2.7 million PCI procedures from 766 hospitals were included. Annual PCI volume of acute indications was consistent over the study period (377,540 in 2010; 374,543 in 2014), but the volume of nonacute PCIs decreased from 89,704 in 2010 to 59,375 in 2014. Among patients undergoing nonacute PCI, there were significant increases in angina severity (Canadian Cardiovascular Society grade III/IV angina, 15.8% in 2010 and 38.4% in 2014), use of antianginal medications prior to PCI (at least 2 antianginal medications, 22.3% in 2010 and 35.1% in 2014), and high-risk findings on noninvasive testing (22.2% in 2010 and 33.2% in 2014) (P < .001 for all), but only modest increases in multivessel coronary artery disease (43.7% in 2010 and 47.5% in 2014, P < .001). The proportion of nonacute PCIs classified as inappropriate decreased from 26.2% (95% CI, 25.8%-26.6%) to 13.3% (95% CI, 13.1%-13.6%), and the absolute number of inappropriate PCIs decreased from 21,781 to 7921. Hospital-level variation in the proportion of PCIs classified as inappropriate persisted over the study period (median, 12.6% [interquartile range, 5.9%-22.9%] in 2014). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Since the publication of the Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in 2009, there have been significant reductions in the volume of nonacute PCI. The proportion of nonacute PCIs classified as inappropriate has declined, although hospital-level variation in inappropriate PCI persists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26551163      PMCID: PMC5459470          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.13764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  13 in total

1.  The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR): building a national clinical data repository.

Authors:  R G Brindis; S Fitzgerald; H V Anderson; R E Shaw; W S Weintraub; J F Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary interventions in Washington State.

Authors:  Steven M Bradley; Charles Maynard; Chris L Bryson
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-05-08

3.  The American College of Cardiology National Database: progress and challenges. American College of Cardiology Database Committee.

Authors:  W S Weintraub; C R McKay; R N Riner; S G Ellis; P L Frommer; D B Carmichael; K E Hammermeister; M N Effros; J E Bost; D P Bodycombe
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Temporal Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriateness: Insights From the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Steven M Bradley; Chad M Bohn; David J Malenka; Michelle M Graham; Chris L Bryson; James M McCabe; Jeptha P Curtis; Anne Lambert-Kerzner; Charles Maynard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Paul S Chan; Manesh R Patel; Lloyd W Klein; Ronald J Krone; Gregory J Dehmer; Kevin Kennedy; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; W Douglas Weaver; Frederick A Masoudi; John S Rumsfeld; Ralph G Brindis; John A Spertus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Development and validation of a short version of the Seattle angina questionnaire.

Authors:  Paul S Chan; Philip G Jones; Suzanne A Arnold; John A Spertus
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-09-02

7.  ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Manesh R Patel; Gregory J Dehmer; John W Hirshfeld; Peter K Smith; John A Spertus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Change in hospital-level use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention and periprocedural outcomes: insights from the national cardiovascular data registry.

Authors:  Steven M Bradley; Sunil V Rao; Jeptha P Curtis; Craig S Parzynski; John C Messenger; Stacie L Daugherty; John S Rumsfeld; Hitinder S Gurm
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-06-04

9.  A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Robert L Frye; Phyllis August; Maria Mori Brooks; Regina M Hardison; Sheryl F Kelsey; Joan M MacGregor; Trevor J Orchard; Bernard R Chaitman; Saul M Genuth; Suzanne H Goldberg; Mark A Hlatky; Teresa L Z Jones; Mark E Molitch; Richard W Nesto; Edward Y Sako; Burton E Sobel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Manesh R Patel; Gregory J Dehmer; John W Hirshfeld; Peter K Smith; John A Spertus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  53 in total

Review 1.  Consensus document for invasive coronary physiologic assessment in Asia-Pacific countries.

Authors:  Hak Seung Lee; Joo Myung Lee; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Joon-Hyung Doh; Neng Dai; Martin K C Ng; Andy S C Yong; Damras Tresukosol; Ajit S Mullasari; Rony Mathew; Praveen Chandra; Kuang-Te Wang; Yundai Chen; Jiyan Chen; Kai-Hang Yiu; Nils P Johnson; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2016 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes : A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Manesh R Patel; John H Calhoon; Gregory J Dehmer; James Aaron Grantham; Thomas M Maddox; David J Maron; Peter K Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Exploring the Healthcare Value of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Appropriateness, Outcomes, and Costs in Michigan Hospitals.

Authors:  Daniel M Alyesh; Milan Seth; David C Miller; James M Dupree; John Syrjamaki; Devraj Sukul; Simon Dixon; Eve A Kerr; Hitinder S Gurm; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-06

4.  Outcomes of PCI in Relation to Procedural Characteristics and Operator Volumes in the United States.

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Pearl Zakroysky; David Dai; Daniel Wojdyla; Matthew W Sherwood; Matthew T Roe; Tracy Y Wang; Eric D Peterson; Hitinder S Gurm; Mauricio G Cohen; John C Messenger; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Moving Beyond the Hospital.

Authors:  Cian P McCarthy; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Zirui Song
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Validation of the "smart" minimum FFR Algorithm in an unselected all comer population of patients with intermediate coronary stenoses.

Authors:  Barry Hennigan; Nils Johnson; John McClure; David Corcoran; Stuart Watkins; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Association between procedure appropriateness and patient-reported outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jesse Xiaolong Yang; Margaret J Stevenson; Linda Valsdottir; Kalon Ho; John A Spertus; Robert W Yeh; Jordan B Strom
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Association Between Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriateness and Publicly Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Paul L Hess; Wenhui Liu; Gary Grunwald; P Michael Ho; Steven M Bradley
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-11-09

9.  Working smarter not harder: Coupling implementation to de-implementation.

Authors:  Virginia Wang; Matthew L Maciejewski; Christian D Helfrich; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2017-12-24

Review 10.  Application of appropriate use criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan.

Authors:  Taku Inohara; Shun Kohsaka; Ikuko Ueda; Takashi Yagi; Yohei Numasawa; Masahiro Suzuki; Yuichiro Maekawa; Keiichi Fukuda
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.