Literature DB >> 26549578

Peripheral, functional and postural asymmetries related to the preferred chewing side in adults with natural dentition.

B Rovira-Lastra1,2, E I Flores-Orozco1,3, R Ayuso-Montero1,2, M Peraire1,2, J Martinez-Gomis1,2.   

Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the preferred chewing side and whether chewing side preference is related to peripheral, functional or postural lateral preferences. One hundred and forty-six adults with natural dentition performed three masticatory assays, each consisting of five trials of chewing three pieces of silicon placed into a latex bag for 20 cycles, either freestyle or unilaterally on the right- or left-hand side. Occlusal contact area in the intercuspal position, maximum bite force, masticatory performance and cycle duration were measured and the lateral asymmetry of these variables was calculated. Laterality tests were performed to determine handedness, footedness, earedness and eyedness as functional preferences, and hand-clasping, arm-folding and leg-crossing as postural lateral preferences. The preferred chewing side was determined using three different methods: assessment of the first chewing cycle for each trial, calculation of the asymmetry index from all cycles and application of a visual analogue scale. Bivariate relationship and multiple linear regression analyses were performed. Among unilateral chewers, 77% of them preferred the right side for chewing. The factors most closely related to the preferred chewing side were asymmetry of bite force, asymmetry of masticatory performance and earedness, which explained up to 16% of the variance. Although several functional or postural lateral preferences seem to be related to the preferred chewing side, peripheral factors such as asymmetry of bite force and of masticatory performance are the most closely related to the preferred chewing side in adults with natural dentition.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cross-sectional studies; functional later-ality; humans; lateral preference; mastication; regression analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26549578     DOI: 10.1111/joor.12369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  5 in total

1.  Average thickness of the bones of the human neurocranium: development of reference measurements to assist with blunt force trauma interpretations.

Authors:  Samantha K Rowbotham; Calvin G Mole; Diana Tieppo; Magda Blaszkowska; Stephen M Cordner; Soren Blau
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Influence of demographic characteristics, tooth loss, and tooth wear on condylar movements: Cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Soha Alratroot; Shahd Khan; Nora Alkaltham; Intisar Ahmad Siddiqui; Ahmad M Al-Thobity
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2022-03-29

3.  Relationship between Unilateral Posterior Crossbite and Human Static Body Posture.

Authors:  Jorge Zurita-Hernandez; Raul Ayuso-Montero; Meritxell Cuartero-Balana; Eva Willaert; Jordi Martinez-Gomis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Biomechanical properties of masticatory balance in cases with RPDs-The influence of preferred and nonpreferred chewing side: A pilot study.

Authors:  Lydia Eberhard; Stefan Rues; Lea Bach; Jürgen Lenz; Hans J Schindler
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-04-28

5.  Four meta-analyses across 164 studies on atypical footedness prevalence and its relation to handedness.

Authors:  Julian Packheiser; Judith Schmitz; Gesa Berretz; David P Carey; Silvia Paracchini; Marietta Papadatou-Pastou; Sebastian Ocklenburg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.