Dalin Tang1, Chun Yang2, Pedro J Del Nido3, Heng Zuo4, Rahul H Rathod5, Xueying Huang6, Vasu Gooty5, Alexander Tang3, Kristen L Billiar7, Zheyang Wu4, Tal Geva5. 1. School of Biological Sciences and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China; Mathematical Sciences Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass. Electronic address: dtang@wpi.edu. 2. Mathematical Sciences Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass; China Information Technology Designing & Consulting Institute Co, Ltd, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. 4. Mathematical Sciences Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass. 5. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. 6. Mathematical Sciences Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass; School of Mathematical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China. 7. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass; Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Mass.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot account for a substantial proportion of cases with late-onset right ventricular failure. The current surgical approach, which includes pulmonary valve replacement/insertion, has yielded mixed results. Therefore, it may be clinically useful to identify parameters that can be used to predict right ventricular function response to pulmonary valve replacement. METHODS: Cardiac magnetic resonance data before and 6 months after pulmonary valve replacement were obtained from 16 patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (8 male, 8 female; median age, 42.75 years). Right ventricular ejection fraction change from pre- to postpulmonary valve replacement was used as the outcome. The patients were divided into group 1 (n = 8, better outcome) and group 2 (n = 8, worst outcome). Cardiac magnetic resonance-based patient-specific computational right ventricular/left ventricular models were constructed, and right ventricular mechanical stress and strain, wall thickness, curvature, and volumes were obtained for analysis. RESULTS: Our results indicated that right ventricular wall stress was the best single predictor for postpulmonary valve replacement outcome with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.819. Mean values of stress, strain, wall thickness, and longitudinal curvature differed significantly between the 2 groups with right ventricular wall stress showing the largest difference. Mean right ventricular stress in group 2 was 103% higher than in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Computational modeling and right ventricular stress may be used as tools to identify right ventricular function response to pulmonary valve replacement. Large-scale clinical studies are needed to validate these preliminary findings.
OBJECTIVE:Patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot account for a substantial proportion of cases with late-onset right ventricular failure. The current surgical approach, which includes pulmonary valve replacement/insertion, has yielded mixed results. Therefore, it may be clinically useful to identify parameters that can be used to predict right ventricular function response to pulmonary valve replacement. METHODS: Cardiac magnetic resonance data before and 6 months after pulmonary valve replacement were obtained from 16 patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (8 male, 8 female; median age, 42.75 years). Right ventricular ejection fraction change from pre- to postpulmonary valve replacement was used as the outcome. The patients were divided into group 1 (n = 8, better outcome) and group 2 (n = 8, worst outcome). Cardiac magnetic resonance-based patient-specific computational right ventricular/left ventricular models were constructed, and right ventricular mechanical stress and strain, wall thickness, curvature, and volumes were obtained for analysis. RESULTS: Our results indicated that right ventricular wall stress was the best single predictor for postpulmonary valve replacement outcome with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.819. Mean values of stress, strain, wall thickness, and longitudinal curvature differed significantly between the 2 groups with right ventricular wall stress showing the largest difference. Mean right ventricular stress in group 2 was 103% higher than in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Computational modeling and right ventricular stress may be used as tools to identify right ventricular function response to pulmonary valve replacement. Large-scale clinical studies are needed to validate these preliminary findings.
Authors: Folkert J Meijboom; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Jackie S McGhie; Silja E C Spitaels; Ron T van Domburg; Lisbeth M W J Utens; Maarten L Simoons; Ad J J C Bogers Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: James S Tweddell; Pippa Simpson; Shun-Hwa Li; Jennifer Dunham-Ingle; Peter J Bartz; Michael G Earing; Andrew N Pelech Journal: Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu Date: 2012
Authors: Christopher M Haggerty; Maria Restrepo; Elaine Tang; Diane A de Zélicourt; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Lucia Mirabella; James Bethel; Kevin K Whitehead; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Kathleen Gilbert; Nickolas Forsch; Sanjeet Hegde; Charlene Mauger; Jeffrey H Omens; James C Perry; Beau Pontré; Avan Suinesiaputra; Alistair A Young; Andrew D McCulloch Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2018-01-02 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Dalin Tang; Heng Zuo; Chun Yang; Zheyang Wu; Xueying Huang; Rahul H Rathod; Alexander Tang; Kristen L Billiar; Tal Geva Journal: Mol Cell Biomech Date: 2017
Authors: Antonio F Corno; Alan G Dawson; Aidan P Bolger; Branco Mimic; Suhair O Shebani; Gregory J Skinner; Simone Speggiorin Journal: Nano Rev Exp Date: 2017-05-01
Authors: Han Yu; Dalin Tang; Tal Geva; Chun Yang; Zheyang Wu; Rahul H Rathod; Xueying Huang; Kristen L Billiar; Pedro J Del Nido Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dalin Tang; Pedro J Del Nido; Chun Yang; Heng Zuo; Xueying Huang; Rahul H Rathod; Vasu Gooty; Alexander Tang; Zheyang Wu; Kristen L Billiar; Tal Geva Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Han Yu; Pedro J Del Nido; Tal Geva; Chun Yang; Zheyang Wu; Rahul H Rathod; Xueying Huang; Kristen L Billiar; Dalin Tang Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 4.566