| Literature DB >> 26548417 |
Ulrich Hoeller1, Manuela Baur1, Franz F Roos1, Lorraine Brennan2, Hannelore Daniel3, Rosalind Fallaize4, Hannah Forster2, Eileen R Gibney2, Mike Gibney2, Magdalena Godlewska5, Kai Hartwig3, Silvia Kolossa3, Christina P Lambrinou6, Katherine M Livingstone7, Julie A Lovegrove4, Anna L Macready4, Yannis Manios6, Cyril F M Marsaux8, J Alfredo Martinez9, Carlos Celis-Morales7, George Moschonis6, Santiago Navas-Carretero9, Clare B O'Donovan2, Rodrigo San-Cristobal9, Wim H M Saris8, Agnieszka Surwiłło5, Iwona Traczyk5, Lydia Tsirigoti6, Marianne C Walsh2, Clara Woolhead2, John C Mathers7, Peter Weber1.
Abstract
An efficient and robust method to measure vitamin D (25-hydroxy vitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) and 25-hydroxy vitamin D2 in dried blood spots (DBS) has been developed and applied in the pan-European multi-centre, internet-based, personalised nutrition intervention study Food4Me. The method includes calibration with blood containing endogenous 25(OH)D3, spotted as DBS and corrected for haematocrit content. The methodology was validated following international standards. The performance characteristics did not reach those of the current gold standard liquid chromatography-MS/MS in plasma for all parameters, but were found to be very suitable for status-level determination under field conditions. DBS sample quality was very high, and 3778 measurements of 25(OH)D3 were obtained from 1465 participants. The study centre and the season within the study centre were very good predictors of 25(OH)D3 levels (P<0·001 for each case). Seasonal effects were modelled by fitting a sine function with a minimum 25(OH)D3 level on 20 January and a maximum on 21 July. The seasonal amplitude varied from centre to centre. The largest difference between winter and summer levels was found in Germany and the smallest in Poland. The model was cross-validated to determine the consistency of the predictions and the performance of the DBS method. The Pearson's correlation between the measured values and the predicted values was r 0·65, and the sd of their differences was 21·2 nmol/l. This includes the analytical variation and the biological variation within subjects. Overall, DBS obtained by unsupervised sampling of the participants at home was a viable methodology for obtaining vitamin D status information in a large nutritional study.Entities:
Keywords: 25(OH)D2zzm321990 25-Hydroxy vitamin D2; 25(OH)D3zzm321990 25-hydroxy vitamin D3; Analytical methods; DBS dried blood spots; Dried blood spot sampling; LOD limit of detection; LOQ limit of quantitation; MeOH methanol; Nutrition intervention study Food4Me; RT room temperature; Vitamin D status
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26548417 DOI: 10.1017/S0007114515004298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Nutr ISSN: 0007-1145 Impact factor: 3.718