Literature DB >> 26548313

Research Ethics in the Context of Transition: Gaps in Policies and Programs on the Protection of Research Participants in the Selected Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.

Andrei Famenka1.   

Abstract

This paper examines the ability of countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) to ensure appropriate protection of research participants in the field of increasingly globalizing biomedical research. By applying an analytical framework for identifying gaps in policies and programs for human subjects protection to four countries of CEE-Belarus, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland, substantial gaps in the scope and content of relevant policies and major impediments to program performance have been revealed. In these countries, public policies on the protection of research participants lack consistency and reliable mechanisms for their implementation. Impediments to program performance most often relate to inadequacies in the national research ethics systems with regard to organizational structure, budgetary support, supervision, and training. The level of research ethics capacity varies from country to country and depends on socio-economic and political factors of post-communist transition. The breadth and depth of the problems identified suggest that the current level of protection for research participants in CEE might be inadequate to the challenges posed by the globalization of biomedical research. In CEE countries, there is a need for strengthening research ethics capacity through modification of relevant policies and improvement of program management. The differences among the countries call for further research on identifying the best approaches for filling the gaps in the policies and programs aimed at ensuring effective protection of research participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central and Eastern Europe; Public policy; Research ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26548313      PMCID: PMC4861682          DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9723-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  16 in total

1.  Ethics and the structures of health care in the European countries in transition: hospital ethics committees in Croatia.

Authors:  Ana Borovecki; Stjepan Oresković; Henk ten Have
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-23

2.  Moving from research ethics review to research ethics systems in low-income and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Adnan A Hyder; Liza Dawson; Abdulgafoor M Bachani; James V Lavery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Polish Research Ethics Committees in the European Union system of assessing medical experiments.

Authors:  Marek Czarkowski; Krzysztof Rózanowski
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 4.  Health reform in central and eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.

Authors:  Bernd Rechel; Martin McKee
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Research ethics review: identifying public policy and program gaps.

Authors:  Martin A Strosberg; Eugenijus Gefenas; Andrei Famenka
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  ETHICAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH IN BELARUS: CURRENT STATUS, PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES.

Authors:  Andrei Famenka
Journal:  Rev Rom Bioet       Date:  2011-04

7.  Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 November 1996). Council of Europe Convention of Biomedicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Failures in clinical trials in the European Union: lessons from the Polish experience.

Authors:  Marcin Waligora
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Why (not) go east? Comparison of findings from FDA Investigational New Drug study site inspections performed in Central and Eastern Europe with results from the USA, Western Europe, and other parts of the world.

Authors:  Paul H Caldron; Svetlana I Gavrilova; Siegfried Kropf
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.

Authors:  Carl H Coleman; Marie-Charlotte Bouësseau
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  1 in total

1.  Research ethics review: identifying public policy and program gaps.

Authors:  Martin A Strosberg; Eugenijus Gefenas; Andrei Famenka
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.