Literature DB >> 22701397

ETHICAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH IN BELARUS: CURRENT STATUS, PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES.

Andrei Famenka1.   

Abstract

The paper provides description of the system of ethical review for biomedical research in Belarus, with special emphasis on its historical background, legal and regulatory framework, structure and functioning. It concludes that the situation with research ethics in Belarus corresponds to the tendency of bureaucratic approach to establishment of systems of ethical review for biomedical research, observed in a number of countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Different social, economical and political factors of transition have major impact on capacities of the Belarusian RECs to ensure adequate protection of human subjects. Among the main problems identified are non-equivalent stringency of ethical review for different types of biomedical research; lack of independence, multidisciplinarity, pluralism and lay representation experienced by RECs; low level of research ethics education and transparency of RECs activities. Recommendations are made to raise the issue of research ethics on the national agenda in order to develop and maintain the research ethics system capable to effectively protect research participants and promote ethical conduct in research.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22701397      PMCID: PMC3372927     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Rom Bioet        ISSN: 1583-5170


  8 in total

1.  The globalization of clinical trials: a growing challenge in protecting human subjects: executive summary (2001).

Authors: 
Journal:  J Int Bioethique       Date:  2003 Mar-Jun

2.  Ethics and the structures of health care in the European countries in transition: hospital ethics committees in Croatia.

Authors:  Ana Borovecki; Stjepan Oresković; Henk ten Have
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-23

3.  Ethics committees and countries in transition: a figleaf for structural violence?

Authors:  Richard E Ashcroft
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-23

4.  Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity.

Authors:  A Hedgecoe; F Carvalho; P Lobmayer; F Raka
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Moving from research ethics review to research ethics systems in low-income and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Adnan A Hyder; Liza Dawson; Abdulgafoor M Bachani; James V Lavery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Twenty years of human research ethics committees in the Baltic States.

Authors:  Vilius Dranseika; Eugenijus Gefenas; Asta Cekanauskaite; Kristina Hug; Signe Mezinska; Eimantas Peicius; Vents Silis; Andres Soosaar; Martin Strosberg
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 2.294

7.  Research ethics committees in Europe: trials and tribulations.

Authors:  Christiane Druml; M Wolzt; J Pleiner; E A Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.

Authors:  Carl H Coleman; Marie-Charlotte Bouësseau
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.652

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Research ethics review: identifying public policy and program gaps.

Authors:  Martin A Strosberg; Eugenijus Gefenas; Andrei Famenka
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Building research ethics capacity in post-communist countries: experience of two Fogarty training programs.

Authors:  Martin A Strosberg; Eugenijus Gefenas; Sana Loue; Sean Philpott
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Research Ethics in the Context of Transition: Gaps in Policies and Programs on the Protection of Research Participants in the Selected Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Andrei Famenka
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Failures in clinical trials in the European Union: lessons from the Polish experience.

Authors:  Marcin Waligora
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Publication ethics in biomedical journals from countries in Central and Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Mindaugas Broga; Goran Mijaljica; Marcin Waligora; Aime Keis; Ana Marusic
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.525

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.