Literature DB >> 26547835

Evaluating the quality of internet information for breast cancer.

A Z Nghiem1, Y Mahmoud2, R Som2.   

Abstract

The internet is frequently used by patients for researching information regarding breast cancer. This study aims to assess the quality of these websites using validated tools. The term 'breast cancer' was searched for in 3 search engines. The top 20 results were selected, and duplicates and irrelevant websites were excluded. 26/34 websites were analysed using the DISCERN Plus tool, HONcode and the JAMA benchmarks. 46% of the websites were classed as 'excellent' when assessed with the DISCERN tool. The range of DISCERN scores was wide (range: 25-74). Nine websites were found to be HONcode certified. Seven websites complied with all four JAMA benchmarks. This study shows the quality of breast cancer information on the internet is on the whole good; however the range of quality is wide. We recommend healthcare professionals use all 3 tools together to establish which websites are best to advise which websites patients should trust.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; DISCERN; Internet

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26547835     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  16 in total

1.  The Quality of Romanian Breast Cancer Websites: a Five-Year Longitudinal Assessment.

Authors:  Valentin Nădăşan; Anca Noela Roşca; Monica Tarcea; Zoltán Ábrám; Marius Măruşteri
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Side effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients : The Internet as an information source.

Authors:  S Janssen; L Käsmann; F B Fahlbusch; D Rades; D Vordermark
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Assessment of the Readability, Adequacy, and Suitability of Online Patient Education Resources for Benign Vascular Tumours Using the DISCERN Instrument.

Authors:  Minh N Q Huynh; Katie E Hicks; Claudia Malic
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 0.947

4.  Evaluation of Internet Information about Lingual Orthodontics Using DISCERN and JAMA Tools.

Authors:  Hatice Kübra Olkun; Arzu Arı Demirkaya
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-04-11

5.  Content and Quality Analysis of Websites as a Patient Resource for Temporomandibular Disorders.

Authors:  Burçin Akan; Funda Çağırır Dindaroğlu
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-12-02

6.  Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet.

Authors:  Samy A Azer; Thekra I AlOlayan; Malak A AlGhamdi; Malak A AlSanea
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.

Authors:  Olivia A Mac; Amy Thayre; Shumei Tan; Rachael H Dodd
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  The extent to which cancer patients trust in cancer-related online information: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lukas Lange; Mona Leandra Peikert; Christiane Bleich; Holger Schulz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  A personalized, web-based breast cancer decision making application: a pre-post survey.

Authors:  Kirk D Wyatt; Sarah M Jenkins; Matthew F Plevak; Marcia R Venegas Pont; Sandhya Pruthi
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment-an assessment of content, quality, and readability.

Authors:  Mehmed Taha Alpaydın; Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk; Nehir Canigur Bavbek
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.341

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.